Re: NIC Selection
bryan_at_redfedora.co.uk
Date: 04/30/04
- Previous message: Joe(theWordy)Philbrook: "Re: Taming the mailing lists?"
- In reply to: Timothy J. Miller: "Re: NIC Selection"
- Next in thread: jludwig: "Re: NIC Selection"
- Reply: jludwig: "Re: NIC Selection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 17:19:59 +0100
> Ok, then lets assume that eth0 has the lowest ip. Does that mean that
> eth1 would never be used?
>
>
> >
> > Given that you did not have created any specific routes for each device
> > or created iptables source routing, then the kernel chooses the card
> > with the lowest IP.
I always thought it dished out eth0 eth1 and so on with the PCI slot it was
plugged into. The higher up in the slots it was the lower the number. I have
to admit I've not checked too carefully before but it stuck in me nog that
that was how it worked.
Bry
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Joe(theWordy)Philbrook: "Re: Taming the mailing lists?"
- In reply to: Timothy J. Miller: "Re: NIC Selection"
- Next in thread: jludwig: "Re: NIC Selection"
- Reply: jludwig: "Re: NIC Selection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
