Re: Quicken Replacement (was Re: Old farts and new Linux)

From: Jeff Vian (jvian10_at_CHARTER.NET)
Date: 05/05/04

  • Next message: Benjamin J. Weiss: "Fedora desktop experience: Great, but not quite all I need" 
    Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 18:11:04 -0500
To: gordonkeehn@netzero.net, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    Gordon Keehn wrote:

    > Steve Searle wrote:
    >
    >>>> Steve Blackwell wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> I just got Quicken 2002 Deluxe to work in wine (wine-20040309-
    >>>>> 1rh73winehq) on my RH7.3 box. If you are interested, I can send you
    >>>>> my config file.
    >>>>
    >>
    >>
    >> and
    >>
    >> Around 09:08pm on Tuesday, May 04, 2004 (UK time), Charles R. Dennett
    >> scrawled:
    >>
    >>
    >>> Anyway, the only reason I keep my old Windows box around is because I
    >>> could not get Microsoft Money 2001 working under wine. I wonder if
    >>> that
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Quicken was the Windows application I continued to use long after I had
    >> abandoned all others for Linux ones (except for some games). However
    >> since
    >> gnucash included scheduled transactions I have been more than happy with
    >> that, so I would recommend you give that a try, rather than trying to
    >> keep going wiht Quicken or Money.
    >>
    >> Cheers
    >>
    >> Steve
    >>
    >>
    > Does gnucash support online exchange of data via .qfx download or
    > similar mechanism? If I actually had to write checks and balance my
    > account by hand, I'd be in prison by now. Either for debt (they DO
    > still have debtor's prisons?) or for kiting checks.
    > Cheers,
    > Gordon
    >
    YES. I use it will all my online banking. 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Benjamin J. Weiss: "Fedora desktop experience: Great, but not quite all I need"