Re: tripwire not in FC1?
From: A.J. Bonnema (abonnema_at_xs4all.nl)
Date: 05/08/04
- Previous message: J. Erik Hemdal: "Re: log in"
- In reply to: neil: "Re: tripwire not in FC1?"
- Next in thread: Steve Searle: "Re: tripwire not in FC1?"
- Reply: Steve Searle: "Re: tripwire not in FC1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 05:19:29 +0200 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
neil wrote:
>
>
> abonnema@xs4all.nl wrote:
>> I still think it would be quite useful: what could replace tripwire
>> i.e. has the same functionality?
>>
>> Guus.
>
> although not identical - the RPM verification feature can tell you what
> file(s) from a particular package have changed since installation. Use:
>
> RPM -Va
>
> to run this check against the entire install. Of course, this is only
> useful if you are installing everything via RPM. But if you're anal
> about security, this is probably what you do anyway.
>
> neil
Neil, thank you: I didn't know I could do this. Even though I sometimes
install non-rpm-packages, I would like to know what changed in the
installed files.
I *really* love (the people on) this list...
Guus.
p.s. I assume 'being anal' about something means: gravely concerned or
paranoid?
-- A.J. Bonnema, Leiden The Netherlands, user #328198 (Linux Counter http://counter.li.org) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: J. Erik Hemdal: "Re: log in"
- In reply to: neil: "Re: tripwire not in FC1?"
- Next in thread: Steve Searle: "Re: tripwire not in FC1?"
- Reply: Steve Searle: "Re: tripwire not in FC1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|