Re: 2.3.4 glibc
From: Jakub Jelinek (jakub_at_redhat.com)
Date: 05/10/04
- Previous message: Brian Ashe: "Re: VIA ProSavageDDR P4M266A on FC1"
- In reply to: Robert Murphy: "2.3.4 glibc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 01:17:27 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:34:45PM +1000, Robert Murphy wrote:
> Hi. Well, I've just subscribed to this list, and haven't received any
> digests yet, but breaking all protocols in such a situation I must ask
> the question: what is the story with Fedora RPMs requiring glibc 2.3.4
> ?? I've had to compile a few things against my existing glibc to get a
They don't require glibc 2.3.4, they require any glibc that provides
some particular @GLIBC_2.3.4 symbols.
Fedora includes a glibc CVS snapshot (this is nothing new, all
Red Hat/Fedora distributions used CVS snapshots for several years), which
provides those @GLIBC_2.3.4 symbols.
What's the problem?
Jakub
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Brian Ashe: "Re: VIA ProSavageDDR P4M266A on FC1"
- In reply to: Robert Murphy: "2.3.4 glibc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
