{please}Re: basic list mail content: {[FC1] or [FC2] or [FC?]}

From: Joe(theWordy)Philbrook (jtwdyp_at_ttlc.net)
Date: 05/17/04

  • Next message: Scott Burns: "FC2 release date?"
    Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 22:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    It would appear that on May 16, Davy Brion did say:

    > On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 18:27, Coume - Lubox.com wrote:
    > > Yep, why not try the [FC1] or [FC2] at the beginning of the subject line?
    >
    > sounds like a good idea... i just hope people won't start complaining
    > when posters don't use this, like with thread-hijacking... as annoying
    > as that is, all the discussions about it are even worse (allthough
    > thankfully, it's become less of a problem recently)

    {please}Re: basic list mail content: {[FC1] or [FC2] or [FC?]}

    {please DON'T} Re: [FC1] or [FC2] or [FC?] basic list mail content:

    That is, *IF* this is done, PLEASE append the [FCx] marker.
    Please DON'T prepend it.

    "sounds like" and "is" are often two different things. This very idea
    was debated in the "Taming the mailing lists?" thread. Only there the
    suggestion was to help those who don't use software to automatically
    filter their fedora list messages into a separate folder by prepending
    the subject with [FC]...

    I wasn't particularly in favor of the idea. But _MY_ main objection
    stemmed from the difference between prepending to the beginning of the
    rest of the subject line and appending to the end of it. Other
    objections were made however. And it won't work well unless EVERYONE
    does it EVERYTIME...

    I think my reasoning is just as valid here. But 1st a new example taken
    from the subject line of the message this is a reply to:

    > Subject: Re: [FC1] Re: basic list mail content: FC1 or FC2
    ___________^^^^^^^^^^^^^____________________________________

    The prepend is already getting kinda long isn't it????

          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Where "x" in "[FCx]" is the core release number:

    Some of us would find the [FCx] in the subject to be a pain. I use
    filtering to group all the "FC" messages to the same folder, Then I
    visually scan the displayed portion of the subject to determine if the
    thread/subject is worth reading...

    This is basically what I see in pines threaded mode index view. except
    that "->" is my quote mark, "##" is the message number, "mmm dd" is a date,
    "Sender Identification" & "(size)" are self explanatory ;)

    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) Original long description of prob
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-Re:Original long description of
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-Re:Original long description
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-Re:Original long descriptio
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-Newbie hijacked thread inter
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-Re:Newbie hijacked thread
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-reply "New subject" Not inte
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-RE:reply "New subject" Not
    -> N ## mmm dd Sender Identification(size) |-interesting "modified su

    As you can see when compared to the two non-truncated subject line
    example sections below The left hand side of the subject is where the
    snap judgment call of "do I open this one or not?" has to be made...

    On the other hand I'd have no objection to [FCx] being appended to the
    END of the subject:

    => Subject: Original long description of problem [FCx]
    => Subject: |-Re:Original long description of problem [FCx]
    => Subject: |-Re:Original long description of problem [FCx]
    => Subject: |-Re:Original long description of problem [FCx]
    => Subject: |-Newbie hijacked thread interesting topic [FCx]
    => Subject: |-Re:Newbie hijacked thread interesting topic [FCx]
    => Subject: |-reply "New subject" Not interesting topic [FCx]
    => Subject: |-RE:reply "New subject" Not interesting topic [FCx]
    => Subject: |-interesting "modified subject" with new point [FCx]

    As this would not interfere with with my visual scanning. While
    Prepending it would be very annoying:

    => Subject: [FCx] Original long description of problem
    => Subject: |-[FCx] Re:Original long description of problem
    => Subject: |-[FCx] Re:Original long description of problem
    => Subject: |-[FCx] Re:Original long description of problem
    => Subject: |-[FCx] Newbie hijacked thread interesting topic
    => Subject: |-[FCx] Re:Newbie hijacked thread interesting topic
    => Subject: |-[FCx] reply "New subject" Not interesting topic
    => Subject: |-[FCx] RE:reply "New subject" Not interesting topic
    => Subject: |-[FCx] interesting "modified subject" with new point

    Nuff said?

    -- 
    |				      ---   ---
    |     Joe (theWordy) Philbrook	      <o>   <o>
    |	   J(tWdy)P			  ^
    |	<<jtwdyp@ttlc.net>>		/---\	"bla bla bla..."
    |					\___/	"...and bla..."
       At least I know my mouth is running, I just can't find the off button!
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Scott Burns: "FC2 release date?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Responses to the list (oops)
      ... The originator fields of a message consist of the from field, ... sender field, ... Resent fields SHOULD be added to any message that is reintroduced by ... suggestions that mailing lists can touch reply-to. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Script Suddenly Failing
      ... > set allGroupMembers to (content of every group entry of group ... correctly (normally 'is in' requires list brackets around {sender} but not ... from mailing lists are actually TO the mailing list, ...
      (microsoft.public.mac.office.entourage)
    • Re: Sendmail and smrsh
      ... >> create mailing lists). ... > In these days with all those virus, worms and faked sender mails flying ... and already have a separate system ... yahda blah yahda blah). ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Which algorithm is used for IP fragmentation ID?
      ... Sorry, that I can not help on your initial question, but something with the e-mail you got is very strange. ... At first, it looks like an ordinary out of office message, but then it is more then a spam or something else which tries to trick the reader into clicking an URL, which eventually could hurt your computer. ... It looks like this has some system, as I found the same question about this e-mail in archives of other mailing lists, eg., and (even on full-disclosure, with faked sender address of the original sender). ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: Script Suddenly Failing
      ... >> I had thought that this script, which I trigger on a schedule, was working ... >> set allGroupMembers to (content of every group entry of group ... I think you should avoid all possibility of the sender using a ... > from mailing lists are actually TO the mailing list, ...
      (microsoft.public.mac.office.entourage)