Re: How stable is fedora?

From: Mike Bartman (omni_at_omniphile.com)
Date: 05/17/04

  • Next message: duncan brown: "Re: The future of Diskette bootstraps" 
    Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:00:04 -0400
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>, fedora-list@redhat.com

    At 11:37 AM 5/10/04 -0700, Sean Kennedy wrote:

    >This is exactly the problem with fc1 in a production enviroment. The
    >fact that it becomes unsupported so fast, as far as patches are
    >concerned. Aside from this, it's perfectly stable and secure from
    >what I've seen. Things get a little wonky when you try playing with
    >3d cards, ati most notably, but that's not a concern you'd have
    >working with a server anyway.

    Who says?

    This "client" vs "server" mentality is very common among marketing types,
    and may even make sense in a large corporate environment, but it's very
    artificial and doesn't apply everywhere at all. My "server" is also a
    "workstation". It uses server software (Sendmail, Named, Apache, etc.),
    and it also uses workstation software (XDM, telnet, ping, gcc, jed, etc.).
    Trying to classify it as one or the other just to fit into the typical
    corporate model is pointless, and will result in error no matter which way
    you go.

    "Server" is not synonymous with "rack-mounted system". Those are a subset
    of "servers". "Server" is a *role*, not a machine type, or OS, or anything
    else hardware or software related. Same with "client". Most machines are
    both at one time or another, and may be both simultaneously (just because
    I'm editing a program source file on the system doesn't mean it isn't also
    receiving mail for me). Roles shift all the time on many machines.

    My main Linux system here (currently Red Hat 7.2) is *mostly* a server...it
    serves lots of things to the other machines here (running several different
    OSs). Time, mail, DNS services, local web pages, etc.. It's also my main
    system for learning about LInux...so when I'm doing that, it's a
    workstation too. There's only one user, me, so there's no problem with an
    AMD 1900+ handling the load of both server and workstation processing
    simultaneously...but both sorts of software need to be loaded and
    accessible.

    When I need to try something really new and potentially disruptive (like
    experimenting with Fedora Core 1), I use a different machine, borrowed
    temporarily from its usual duties with a HD swap (removable trays make this
    trivial and quick to do). The rest of the time my "server" makes a fine
    "workstation".

    >Right now, I would recommend against fc1 for servers, due simply to
    >it's release cycle. Granted, it may be quite easy to yum upgrade to
    >fc2, or there may develop a large enough community to keep updating
    >the rpms, but as of now, that all seems vaporous, and definitely not
    >something to base a server off of. The enterprise version of redhat
    >is a good idea in this case.

    Not unless money is no object for you...and only when your "server" is used
    only in that role, and no others. For those of us with small offices, it's
    too expensive, overkill and poorly adapted to the requirements. Red Hat
    doesn't *have* a product for small offices anymore. Just corporate giants
    with specialized machines for each role.

    FC1 has the right software, or so it appears at this point in my
    investigations, but if I'll have to upgrade to FC2 to keep getting fixes
    for security holes, perhaps it isn't the right way to go either. I don't
    have the spare time to make a career out of upgrading my software (other
    than minor fixes for security holes as needed, and the less often that is
    needed, the better). I don't need to be running the "latest and greatest"
    for features...what I have already has all the features I need at the moment.

    It's looking like Red Hat is interested only in huge corporations, and
    Fedora is for those who want to mess with the systems constantly as a
    hobby. I'm looking for something like Red Hat 7.2...but with security
    patches available as needed. Something that I don't have to upgrade
    constantly, that works reliably, and that has enough support to keep it
    working safely. It was starting to look like FC1 would fill that bill, so
    I've gotten it, installed it, and am looking it over, but if support for
    keeping it secure is going to go away, and require an upgrade to a new
    version every few months, it's not going to cut it either.

    -- Mike Bartman 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: duncan brown: "Re: The future of Diskette bootstraps"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: RH to Debian migration
      ... > Workstation, so they setup one RHN account, added all 10 machines and then ... I don't know about the Enterprise Workstation license, ... On your DHCP server configure it to ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Remote access
      ... RDP should be enabled by default, it was on my machines. ... the Server to a new gateway, not sure if its related but I remember ... >>remote access to work internally first. ... >>the workstation in the system applet in the control ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Workstations are going offline! Help!
      ... machines out of 8 would have this problem, ... are brand new machines & the server is brand new as well. ... A side note, on each affected workstation, when you reboot, the windows ... Connection-specific DNS Suffix. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: How stable is fedora?
      ... a server doesn't have to be rack mounted. ... you're running services on your workstation. ... it may be quite easy to yum upgrade to ... for small offices, it's called RHEL. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: How stable is fedora?
      ... a server doesn't have to be rack mounted. ... you're running services on your workstation. ... it may be quite easy to yum upgrade to ... my home when it's not a money or productivity thing. ...
      (Fedora)