Re: To be or not be?
From: Scot L. Harris (webid_at_cfl.rr.com)
Date: 05/25/04
- Previous message: Paul R. Ganci: "Re: Disabling LVM check/startup on FC2"
- In reply to: Jeff Vian: "Re: To be or not be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 20:25:54 -0400
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 19:01, Jeff Vian wrote:
> >
> >I would have expected this to be handled differently, a separate
> >interface defined for each. (eth0, eth1)
> >
> >Good luck with your laptop.
> >
> >
> >
> You will have 2 interface names, IF both cards are plugged in at the
> same time.
Unfortunately the xircom card blocks both pcmcia slots so I can not have
both cards installed at the same time.
I would have thought that if the interface already defined was for a
different card that a new one would be created for that cards settings.
As is it is kind of funny to look at the config when the xircom card is
installed and see options for a wireless card.
Still works but not very clean IMHO.
-- Scot L. Harris <webid@cfl.rr.com> -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Paul R. Ganci: "Re: Disabling LVM check/startup on FC2"
- In reply to: Jeff Vian: "Re: To be or not be?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
