fedora-list-request@redhat.com

From: Thomas Echevarria (tom_at_xiontech.com)
Date: 05/27/04

  • Next message: Corné Beerse: "Re: Doubt! New Fedora" 
    To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 09:10:52 -0500

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <fedora-list-request@redhat.com>
    To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 9:00 AM
    Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 434

    > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    >
    > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    > fedora-list-request@redhat.com
    >
    > You can reach the person managing the list at
    > fedora-list-owner@redhat.com
    >
    > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
    >
    >
    > Today's Topics:
    >
    > 1. Re: Tripwire and Fedora (Michael Schwendt)
    > 2. Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers] (Frederic Soulier)
    > 3. FC2 on Thinkpad T21 (Gawrysiak, Piotr (GILW))
    > 4. Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound (Paul D. Brown)
    > 5. RE: splash screen - system hangs ? (tomislavp)
    > 6. Re: rsyncing 79gb of data to 250gb drive (Jeff Vian)
    > 7. Problems with usb on FC1 (eric tanguy)
    > 8. Re: Anybody have any experience with RAID controllers under
    > Fedora? (Chris Adams)
    > 9. Re: How to use NVIDIA Official driver on Fedora (Frederic Soulier)
    > 10. Re: Disabling LVM check/startup on FC2 (Gabriel Labelle)
    > 11. Re: tv card (Christopher Chan)
    > 12. Still the anoying installer problem. (akonstam@trinity.edu)
    > 13. Re: 6-in-1 card reader: works in fc1 and not in fc2 (Dave Jones)
    > 14. Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound (Wade Hampton)
    > 15. Re: Problems with usb on FC1 (Alexander Dalloz)
    > 16. Changing the JVM that Tomcat uses (Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel)
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 1
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:26:54 +0200
    > From: Michael Schwendt <fedora@wir-sind-cool.org>
    > Subject: Re: Tripwire and Fedora
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20040526152654.574cad64.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    >
    > On Wed, 26 May 2004 10:14:45 -0300, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, 25 May 2004 23:40:33 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
    > >
    > > > On Tue, 25 May 2004 14:00:41 -0300, Bruno Tobias Stella wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > I read some emails posted in this list and I'd like to know if:
    > > > >
    > > > > 1-) Today, is there a Tripwire Package for Fedora ?
    > > >
    > > > Yes, for Fedora Core 1 since the rebuild for FC2 has not happened
    > > > yet. http://fedora.us "testing" repository. Your best bet is to fetch
    the
    > > > src.rpm and rebuild it on FC2, if you want it for FC2.
    > >
    > > I will use this "testing" tripwire in Fedora Core 1.
    > > But, I don't know if somebody can help me, because the link
    > >
    "download.fedora.us/fedora/redhat/1/i386/SRPMS.testing/tripwire-2.3.1-18.fdr
    .3.1.src.rpm"
    > > is not found on that server. Are there somebody that knows another link
    or rebuilds
    > > this link ?
    >
    > Where did you find that link? It's wrong because 'redhat/1' would
    > mean 'Red Hat Linux 1'.
    >
    > Binary for FC1:
    >
    >
    http://download.fedora.us/fedora/fedora/1/i386/RPMS.testing/tripwire-2.3.1-1
    8.fdr.3.1.i386.rpm
    >
    > Source:
    >
    >
    http://download.fedora.us/fedora/fedora/1/i386/SRPMS.testing/tripwire-2.3.1-
    18.fdr.3.1.src.rpm
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 2
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:27:59 +0100
    > From: Frederic Soulier <frederic@wallaby.uklinux.net>
    > Subject: Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1085574479.4240.136.camel@possum.3ghq.local>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:05, dalen wrote:
    > > Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
    > > > On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 19:28 -0500, dalen wrote:
    > > >
    > > >>When Rui suggests something constructive such as a method to play
    > > >>TuxRacer without proprietary drivers, I may consider listening. Until
    > > >>then, rui_zealotry.pl is simply troll noise on this list.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > I did suggest something constructive:
    > > >
    > > > a) To use your power as a costumer to create demand for Free
    Software
    > > > drivers.
    >
    > How do I do that?
    >
    >
    > > > b) change your graphics card
    > > >
    > > > Using the proprietary driver, which even artificially restricts the
    way
    > > > you use your graphics card with MACROVISION, you will never have Free
    > > > Software drivers, and you will be under the control imposed by NVIDIA.
    > > >
    > > > You're calling me a zealot, but in fact the zealot is you. You are the
    > > > one who's blindly idolatring a company that wants to control what you
    do
    > > > with your computer.
    >
    > How is Nvidia controlling what I do with my computer?
    > Don't compare Microsoft position with nVidia position, please. nVidia
    > could be gone in a matter of months if they sleep for too long on their
    > success. Let say they f*** up big time one generation of GPU and most
    > sells will swing into ATI camp (or any other contenders to the top
    > spots).
    > If nVidia were to do something silly I could swap the card in a matter
    > of minutes.
    > I'm using open formats for my documents.
    > I setup my computers in such a way that as long as I have my data backed
    > up on a CD-R or DVD-R I'm safe.
    > Neither nVidia nor Microsoft controls what I do with my computers.
    > The key word is "dependence".
    >
    > > > Rui
    > > >
    > > What would be your choice for suggestion b?
    >
    > I would also be interested by an answer to b)
    >
    > --
    > Frederic Soulier <frederic@wallaby.uklinux.net>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 3
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:30:17 +0200
    > From: "Gawrysiak, Piotr (GILW)" <Piotr.Gawrysiak@fao.org>
    > Subject: FC2 on Thinkpad T21
    > To: "'fedora-list@redhat.com'" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <83A0A35C4606234EA2FE8664956D0D7002E65D97@giexch1.fao.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    >
    > Anyone installed Fedora Core 2 on IBM Thinkpad T21 and got suspend,
    standby
    > and hibernation working? (APM or ACPI - for me APM does not work at all,
    and
    > ACPI only partially...)
    >
    > Piotr Gawrysiak
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    > URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/8dc69e89/attachment.htm
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 4
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:36:12 -0500
    > From: "Paul D. Brown" <pdb@pdb.homelinux.net>
    > Subject: Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <20040526133612.GB24333@pdb.homelinux.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >
    > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:43:28AM -0500, Marc Mouries wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > With FC I can see in the control panel that my sound card
    > > is well recognized. My soundblaster live is seen as "emu10k1"
    > > but there is not sound.
    > > I tried to raise the volume in the alsa mixer but it did not help.
    > >
    > > Any hints ?
    > >
    > > Marc
    >
    > It isn't still muted, is it? The mixer starts with the volume zeroed
    > and muted, I think.
    >
    > Paul
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 5
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:56:57 +0200
    > From: "tomislavp" <perica@zamir.net>
    > Subject: RE: splash screen - system hangs ?
    > To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20040526130052.657554AD27@dns1.vodatel.hr>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    >
    > y,y,y, i get it
    >
    > sorry for such "questions", i am really new linux user, so sometimes i am
    > blocked with really simple problems whatever so this is my fedora
    conspiracy
    > :):
    >
    > booting, start-up everything is ok, except last line, after mdmonitor(or
    > mdpd), kernel do not support ... ?
    >
    > (unfortunately i can not see error, and do not know how to see log file in
    > "Fail safe" mode)
    >
    > then next thing is:
    >
    > after login on, as root or normal user, system hangs at Splash screen.
    >
    > i tried with:
    >
    > Unprobe
    >
    > Generic LCD 800x600
    >
    > Monitor 800x600
    >
    >
    >
    > i can not save any monitor type, seems that is something with monitor,
    gnome
    > and X server
    >
    > when i trying to edit XF86Config file in fail safe terminal mode seems
    that
    > their is not such a file, possible ??
    >
    > i also tested memory and everything seems all right
    >
    > cheers
    >
    > tomislav
    >
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    >
    > From: Sean Estabrooks [ <mailto:seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
    > mailto:seanlkml@sympatico.ca]
    >
    > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:43 PM
    >
    > To: perica@zamir.net
    >
    > Subject: Re: splash screen - system hangs ?
    >
    > On Mon, 24 May 2004 12:34:19 +0200
    >
    > "tomislavp" <perica@zamir.net> wrote:
    >
    > > ++
    >
    > > if i want to boot in single mode (at grub, and type " single") system
    >
    > > hangs on "Enabling swap space: {OK}"
    >
    > > "sh-2.05# " <<<< list line ?
    >
    > >
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > That's actually the successful conclusion of booting into single user
    mode.
    >
    > It's a prompt waiting for you to type commands. Single user mode is
    >
    > non-graphical unless you start the GUI manually.
    >
    > Sean
    >
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    > URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/c64eb059/attachment.htm
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 6
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:35:16 -0500
    > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@charter.net>
    > Subject: Re: rsyncing 79gb of data to 250gb drive
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <40B49D14.4090909@charter.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
    >
    >
    >
    > James Wilkinson wrote:
    >
    > >Michael Mansour wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>I have an issue which I can't seem to figure out.
    > >>
    > >>I bought a 250Gb Maxtor Maxline Plus ATA133 drive,
    > >>plugged it into a server, formatted it using:
    > >>
    > >># e2fsck -m 0 -j -b 1024 /dev/hdc1
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    > formatted using e2fsck??
    > Do you perchance mean mke2fs?
    >
    > >>I made the partition a Linux partition id 82.
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    > Type 82 is linux swap space, not filesystem space.
    >
    > >>After format, 241Gb free space is recognised.
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    > This seems reasonable
    >
    > >>I have 80Gb of data on another drive in the system
    > >>that I wish to backup onto this drive. So after
    > >>rsyncing the drives contents from the 79Gb (which is
    > >>on a stripe) to the maxtor 250Gb drive, the following
    > >>is the result:
    > >>
    > >>/dev/md6 85419328 79573952 1506236
    > >>99% /data01
    > >>/dev/hdc1 241201359 123508888 117692471
    > >>52% /data02
    > >>
    > >>123Gb used??? this is what is confusing me, why?
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > ><snip>
    > >
    > >
    > >>I thought maybe the rsync was following symlinks
    > >>(which I'm sure there are none), but by default the
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >What about hard links? Try
    > >find /data01 -type f -links +1 -ls | sort
    > >to see if there are any.
    > >
    > >HTH,
    > >
    > >James.
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 7
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:12:12 +0200 (CEST)
    > From: "eric tanguy" <eric.tanguy@physique.univ-nantes.fr>
    > Subject: Problems with usb on FC1
    > To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID:
    > <33363.193.52.103.32.1085577132.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr>
    >
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
    >
    > I have an Asus motherboard A7N8X-VM/400 and i need to boot on winxp use
    > the usb drives and then reboot to linux to get them working properly. If
    i
    > directly boot to linux the drives are not recognised. Someone could help
    > me to solve that ?
    > Regards
    > Eric
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 8
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:41:28 -0500
    > From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
    > Subject: Re: Anybody have any experience with RAID controllers under
    > Fedora?
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20040526134128.GC812137@hiwaay.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >
    > Once upon a time, Jeremy Brown <jeremy@cadre5.com> said:
    > > Benjamin Arai wrote:
    > > >Has anybody had any good experiences with RAID controllers under
    > > >Fedora? If so, which card and what happened.
    > > >
    > > A little OT, but I wholeheartedly recommend looking into Linux software
    > > RAID, which delivers performance almost equal to that of most hardware
    > > RAID controllers...and often a higher level of stability.
    >
    > I have several servers with AMI/LSI MegaRAID cards, and they are very
    > good. You can download a "megamgr" program from LSI's website that will
    > let you manage the RAID arrays while the system is up (I have replaced a
    > failed drive and rebuilt an array without the system ever going down).
    >
    > I have servers with software RAID and servers with hardware RAID. If
    > you are looking for data reliability, software RAID is fine. If you are
    > looking for server reliability, go with hardware RAID.
    >
    > What I mean is this: data reliability is when you don't lose data
    > because of a disk failure. The system may go down, or you may have to
    > take it down to replace the failed disk, but you don't lose any data.
    > Server reliability is when the system needs to be up and running 24x7;
    > when a disk fails, you just want to know about it so you can install a
    > replacement without the server ever going off-line.
    >
    > If you combine hardware RAID with LVM (and online filesystem resize
    > patches), you can upgrade disk systems and increase storage space
    > without ever shutting down or unmounting a filesystem. I've done this
    > several times under HP Tru64 Unix (with external storage array systems
    > and Tru64's AdvFS filesystem).
    >
    > --
    > Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
    > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
    > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 9
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:20:42 +0100
    > From: Frederic Soulier <frederic@wallaby.uklinux.net>
    > Subject: Re: How to use NVIDIA Official driver on Fedora
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <1085577642.4236.159.camel@possum.3ghq.local>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:53, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
    > > On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:38:00 +0100
    > > Frederic Soulier <frederic@wallaby.uklinux.net> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Well I guess it makes a lot of business sense to cross-license, buy a
    > > > license for something you don't have, etc... instead of developing
    > > > everything from scratch.
    > >
    > > We're talking about priorities. When you reward companies that
    > > do things that aren't in the best interests of the future of Linux
    > > you're not helping Linux.
    > >
    > > > Ok so it's recommended because:
    > > > a) It's cheap
    > > > b) It's supported by Open Source drivers
    > > >
    > > > I agree b) is important.
    > > >
    > > > But what about a card recommended because:
    > > > a) it's top of the range
    > > > b) loads of features fully supported
    > > > c) 3D drivers on par or better than windows counterparts
    > >
    > > If you sell out the hope of long term gains for some immediate benefit
    > > you haven't really won anything and the above benefits will evaporate
    > > very quickly.
    > >
    > > Would you buy products from a company who used slave-labor-class
    > > workers in remote parts of the world just because they had a cooler
    > > logo or a more padded sole? Sometimes the best decision isn't the
    > > easiest one.
    >
    > Well, on a philosophical level I totally agree with you but just to
    > throw some oil on the fire ;)
    >
    > - how do you know for sure you're not using/buying something made
    > by a company using slave-labour?
    > - would you still leave in a country where a group of people robbed
    > this very same country from the true president?
    > - do you think it's ok to have the olympic games in China?
    > - do you think you eat good stuff, non-polluted, non-modified and so
    > on?
    > - haven't you bought any pepsi or coke at all? do you think they're
    > the most responsible corporations in the world?
    > Dou you drink only tap water? Are you sure the tap water you're
    > drinking is not polluted?
    > - What about Nike?
    > - How do you know that a company producing nice graphics cards with
    > nice open source drivers is not using some components made by a
    > a supplier that doesn't care about not polluting water when making
    > these very components :(
    >
    > This could go on and on. My point is if you wake up and start digging
    > deep into these major issues and their ramifications then you may as
    > well stop living :)
    > Life's too short mate.
    >
    > Sorry for being really really off-topic for this list.
    >
    > --
    > Frederic Soulier <frederic@wallaby.uklinux.net>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 10
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:13:17 +0200 (CEST)
    > From: "Gabriel Labelle" <glabelle@optimized.org>
    > Subject: Re: Disabling LVM check/startup on FC2
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID:
    > <28364.::ffff:194.119.123.25.1085577197.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
    >
    > > Optimized wrote:
    > >
    > >>My FC2 system is installed on linux raid volume but I have no use for
    > >>LVM.
    > >>
    > >>I would like to disable the lvm check on system startup since it always
    > >>fails, how should I proceed in order to make it clean?
    > >>
    > > FWIW this issue has been discussed on the linux-lvm mailing list (see
    > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2004-May/msg00059.html). The
    > > /sbin/vgscan program incorrectly returns an error when there are no
    > > volume groups. The problem will be fixed in the next release not that
    > > this helps us now. It is currently fixed in CVS if you wished to build
    > > lvm2 from that.*
    > > *
    > >
    > > --
    > > Paul (ganci@nurdog.com)
    >
    > Thank you Paul! This is the answer I was waiting for :)
    >
    > Gabriel (Optimized)
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 11
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 21:23:34 +0800
    > From: Christopher Chan <cchan@outblaze.com>
    > Subject: Re: tv card
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <40B49A56.90004@outblaze.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
    >
    > Chadley Wilson wrote:
    > > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 06:44, Gordy Campbell wrote:
    > >
    > >>Hi All,
    > >>
    > >>I am quite new to Linux and was wondering whether or not I could get my
    > >>TV card working in FC2?
    > >>
    > >>The TV card is a Wintv pci nova. I ran the hardware wizard and that
    > >>tells me that the manufacturer is Philips Semiconductors and it has
    > >>installed a driver called nuget-ci.
    > >>
    > >>I have tried running TVtimes i get a message saying 'no video source'
    > >>and a message saying, 'cannot open video device /dev/video0
    >
    > dmesg. Maybe the driver had some problems. eg: I cannot use the DC10 I
    > have because my mobo is a blinking VIA (KT266A) chipset.
    >
    > I am just happy the PCTV works at all.
    > >>
    > >>Anyone got any ideas,
    > >>
    > >>Gordy
    > >
    > > Hi Gordy
    > > Although there are ways and means of getting the the card working it is
    > > a bit of a tricky situation.
    > > If you are running FC1 you are in a spot because you will probably have
    > > to add v4l (video 4 linux), I found it very difficult and expensive when
    > > you use a modem connection.
    >
    > add? v4l is available already on RH9.
    >
    > I have a Miro PCTV and it works out of the box.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 12
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:52:16 -0500
    > From: akonstam@trinity.edu
    > Subject: Still the anoying installer problem.
    > To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20040526135216.GA6687@Moof.cs.trinity.edu>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >
    > As I suspected the installer in FC2 still has the following anoying
    > problem. You create the root user before you decide that you don't
    > want to use md5 passwds. So root has a md5 passwd that screws up
    > passwd autherization ant least if you are using NIS.
    > Why was this done? It would have been easy to make the default
    > non-md5 passwds.
    > --
    > -------------------------------------------
    > Aaron Konstam
    > Computer Science
    > Trinity University
    > One Trinity Place.
    > San Antonio, TX 78212-7200
    >
    > telephone: (210)-999-7484
    > email:akonstam@trinity.edu
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 13
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 14:50:37 +0100
    > From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
    > Subject: Re: 6-in-1 card reader: works in fc1 and not in fc2
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1085579437.19066.3.camel@delerium.codemonkey.org.uk>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 13:33, Atul Chitnis wrote:
    >
    > > I have reported the problem in bugzilla:
    > >
    > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124139
    >
    > Looks like another that needs adding to the whitelist.
    > Can you do the test as described in the post I just made to the bug ?
    >
    > > after this, the kernel should scan for partitions /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2,
    > > etc. but it doesnt. This is the same whether I use a single LUN device
    > > like the Cruzer (as shown above) or a multi-LUN device like a 7-in-1
    card
    > > reader.
    >
    > Multi-lun devices like these need to get added as they get found to
    > the whitelist right now. In the future we'll have to do something
    > better about these, like having kudzu detect them, and put the
    > relevant lines in your /etc/modprobe.conf saving us having to do a
    > kernel update just to update the whitelist.
    >
    > We can't just turn on multi-lun probing on all devices, as this
    > breaks some devices, by locking up the scsi bus when non-existant
    > lun's are probed.
    >
    > > If this bug is confirmed, I'd treat it with a sense of urgency - these
    > > days, just about everyone uses USB-storage devices, and this is a
    definite
    > > show-stopper.
    >
    > I've just been through bugzilla and added a load of these devices
    > to the whitelist (and sent them upstream too). If you or anyone
    > else comes across any further devices that don't work without
    > max_luns tweaking after tomorrows kernel, then please let me know about
    > them, and I'll make sure they get added.
    >
    > Dave
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 14
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 09:53:08 -0400
    > From: Wade Hampton <wade.hampton@nsc1.net>
    > Subject: Re: Soundcard recognized but no sound
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <40B4A144.2090600@nsc1.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    >
    > Paul D. Brown wrote:
    >
    > >On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:43:28AM -0500, Marc Mouries wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>Hi,
    > >>
    > >>With FC I can see in the control panel that my sound card
    > >>is well recognized. My soundblaster live is seen as "emu10k1"
    > >>but there is not sound.
    > >>I tried to raise the volume in the alsa mixer but it did not help.
    > >>
    > >>Any hints ?
    > >>
    > >>Marc
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >It isn't still muted, is it? The mixer starts with the volume zeroed
    > >and muted, I think.
    > >
    > >
    > Are you playing a CD or a sound clip (for example, via XMMS)? If playing
    > a CD and this is a newer machine, often they are shipped without the cable
    > from the CD drive to the sound card so a standard CD play program on Linux
    > will not produce audio (but it works fine under Windows as WMP reads
    > the sound from the CD, loads it into the CPU, does pretty graphics,
    > and writes it out to the audio device).
    >
    > Any Linux-based CD players that do the same thing as WMP (nice eye
    > candy)?
    >
    > Good luck,
    > --
    > Wade Hampton
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 15
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:56:46 +0200
    > From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@uni-bielefeld.de>
    > Subject: Re: Problems with usb on FC1
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1085579805.4717.317.camel@sirendipity.dogma.lan>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    >
    > Am Mi, den 26.05.2004 schrieb eric tanguy um 15:12:
    >
    > > I have an Asus motherboard A7N8X-VM/400 and i need to boot on winxp use
    > > the usb drives and then reboot to linux to get them working properly.
    If i
    > > directly boot to linux the drives are not recognised. Someone could
    help
    > > me to solve that ?
    > > Regards
    > > Eric
    >
    > Is USB Legacy support on in the motherboard BIOS? If yes, then set it
    > off.
    >
    > Alexander
    >
    >
    > --
    > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
    > Fedora GNU/Linux Core 1 (Yarrow) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl
    > Sirendipity 15:56:02 up 3 days, 21:52, load average: 0.37, 0.39, 0.39
    > [ Î"νÏ?θι Ïf'αÏ.Ï"ον - gnothi seauton ]
    > my life is a planetarium - and you are the stars
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > Name: not available
    > Type: application/pgp-signature
    > Size: 189 bytes
    > Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
    > Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/322624e2/attachment.bin
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 16
    > Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:00:26 +0200
    > From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" <jan-pieter@piozum.com>
    > Subject: Changing the JVM that Tomcat uses
    > To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <015401c44329$cc7caf20$0264a8c0@janpieter>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm having a problem changing the JVM that Tomcat uses from the one from
    the Free Software Foundation to the one from Sun. I've installed the
    J2SDK1.4.2_04 from Sun and have added the JAVA_HOME environment variable ( =
    /usr/java/j2sdk1.4.2_04) to /etc/profile. But after restarting Tomcat, it
    still uses the JVM from the Free Software Foundation. How can I change this?
    > When i use the command 'env' i can see that the JAVA_HOME environment
    variable is present and pointing to the correct location.
    >
    > Thanks in advance,
    >
    > Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel
    >
    > My system: Fedora Core 1, Tomcat 4.1.27.
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    > URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040526/ca7f73f6/attachment.htm
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > --
    > fedora-list mailing list
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    >
    >
    > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 3, Issue 434
    > *******************************************
    >
    > 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Corné Beerse: "Re: Doubt! New Fedora"