Re: AMD64 - Yum/Apt sources

From: Linux (linux_at_herbasource.com)
Date: 05/31/04

  • Next message: Peter Boy: "Re: AMD64 - Yum/Apt sources"
    To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 13:08:22 +0100
    
    

    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm picking up my new AMD 64 3000/K8V-Deluxe computer tonight! Woo! Hoo!
    I
    > nice jump from my Celeron 366mhz.
    >
    > Are the source files for Yum and Apt any different for the 64 version of
    > FC2 than the standard 32 bit version? Any sample sources I could be
    > directed to so I can get things up and running quickly?
    >
    > As well, any tips on the AMD 64 FC2 version would be welcomed before I
    > install tonight. This is my first time venturing in to the land of 64bit.
    >
    > I searched the archives for some benchmarks between the 32 and 64 FC2
    > versions. Has anyone seen anything that would indicate a difference in
    > speed if you load both on to an AMD 64-based computer?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > ~Rory

    I have also just upgraded from a very old machine to a K8V std amd64 3200
    and the AMD64 bit FC2 version, the speed is just awesome, I cant comment or
    give specifics as I am too new at linux, sorry, only to say you will not be
    dissapointed.
    The only problem I am having is that FC2 will not install to my Maxtor 200gb
    sata drive although it see's it, it detects all other hardware ok and
    install to a 30gb Maxtor IDE drive ok. I believe that it might be something
    to do with the fact that FC2 does not see hd over 130gb as it might not
    support LBA48, as suggested by Paul in my other post.

    Jeff
    >
    > --
    > fedora-list mailing list
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    >
    >

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Peter Boy: "Re: AMD64 - Yum/Apt sources"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
      ... Yum: Has least built-in features of the three package managers ... Apt: A well integrated product with more built-in features than yum. ... apt does not have prioritization of repositories. ... go out of one's way to install smart and configure third-party ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: apt on FC4
      ... I'm tired of yum not working. ... I see from your past e-mails that you're using x86-64. ... I'm not aware of any 64 bit Fedora apt repos for precisely this reason. ... *only* install. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: smart package mgr question?
      ... apt and smart diagnose them and try to resolve them, ... I.e. the fact yum doesn't complain, ... I have run into problems where apt tries to fix the repository issues ... via yum install gtk* ..about 40 megs worth and I still ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: smart package mgr question?
      ... I.e. the fact yum doesn't complain, ... I have run into problems where apt tries to fix the repository ... updating a package which is completely unrelated to repo breakages. ... You need to install the first ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: now KDE packages cant be updated via "yum"
      ... >Now that fc2 is in legacy, what links do we use to allow a yum ... Ah, missed the fc2 bit, so no Fedora Extras/rpm.livna.org is strictly ... kde-redhat no longer officially supports legacy releases (like ... >repo's to my yum.conf, but even so, no kde was offered for install. ...
      (Fedora)