Re: FAQ Question? Any FC2 programmers read this?

From: Marc Lucke (marc_at_marcsnet.com)
Date: 06/01/04

  • Next message: Ragone_Andrew: "Random Screen Blank on startup all the Time."
    Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:42:23 +1000
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    
    

    Panu Matilainen wrote:

    >On Mon, 31 May 2004, Marc Lucke wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>Stupid question - probably an RTFA one at that so sorry in advance -
    >>would this list be looked at by any one of the Fedora coders? There are
    >>many basic Q&As which is good but is there another place for me to ask
    >>or relate my problem/s?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Yes there are developers hanging around on this list as well. Whether your
    >question is appropriate for fedora-devel is another matter (which I can't
    >answer since you didn't include any of those questions here :)
    >Usually it doesn't hurt asking first on fedora-list, it's much more
    >catch-all in nature than the other forums.
    >
    > - Panu -
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Thanks Panu. Earlier in the list I asked about kernel >= 2.4.24 (I
    think) recognising my sata disk as hde and booting from it no problems.
    The FC1 kernels never did, though - I had to compile my own. I was
    surprised about the sata section not being in the low-level scsi driver
    section but it the kernel worked anyway. The 2.6 series kernel seem to
    have gone back to the bad old days (from my point of view) of needing
    libata, that piix module and the other low level scsi drivers. In fact
    to boot my system at all I had to modify the initrd to load these modules.

    What I want is the old hde thing back - i.e. ata, not scsi emulation.
    When I got the drive as hde it was much faster and my system could be
    made to do other things whilst the disk was busy. I don't really want
    to compile my own kernels or mess about with the initrd because this
    means work for me everytime there is a kernel update just to get it working!

    It is a 865PE chipset on a Gigabyte 8IPE1000PRO2 m/b, ich5.

    If anyone else has this computer setup and has the same problems I am
    happy to help them get to where I am which, at least, is working. Love
    the way 2.6.5 handles memory! Very snappy kernel.

    Marc

    
    

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Ragone_Andrew: "Random Screen Blank on startup all the Time."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Iomega ZIP-100 drive unsupported with jmicron JMB361 chip?
      ... After compilation and installation of the kernel rpm, ... Note that my Fedora 7 and Fedora 8 distributions share no directories ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # AX.25 network device drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Iomega ZIP-100 drive unsupported with jmicron JMB361 chip?
      ... After compilation and installation of the kernel rpm, ... Note that my Fedora 7 and Fedora 8 distributions share no directories ... # IPVS transport protocol load balancing support ... # AX.25 network device drivers ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: FC6 KDE No Keyboard
      ... Re: emacs!!! ... going back to a previous kernel ... FC6 KDE No Keyboard ... I've since gone back to the default Fedora firewall ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: install woes, SUCCESS!
      ... vmlinuz initrd=initrd.img noapic nolapic ... appended the kernel, probably post-install. ... but on attempting to install, it freezes up at the test media screen. ... Fedora 8 installed ok, but I had problems booting post install, and had to ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: install woes
      ... looking at the Fedora 9 64bit DVD: ... I'd try the acpi=off, but I didn't need any boot options, as far as I remember ... appended the kernel, probably post-install. ... but on attempting to install, it freezes up at the test media screen. ...
      (Fedora)