Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!
From: Michael P. Soulier (msoulier_at_digitaltorque.ca)
Date: 06/05/04
- Previous message: Jason L Tibbitts III: "Re: 32 bit apps under AMD64 Fedora"
- In reply to: Antti Aspinen: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Next in thread: Craig White: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Reply: Craig White: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Reply: Paul: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 21:55:55 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On 04/06/04 Antti Aspinen said:
> However I don't usually upgrade Linuxes and this is just one example why
> not. I make allways a clean installation. I suggest to you when you
I would just point out that Debian upgrades just fine. I think that
Fedora should strive to meet that standard.
Mike
-- Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> The major advances in civilization are processes that all but wreck the societies in which they occur. -- Albert North Whitehead
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Jason L Tibbitts III: "Re: 32 bit apps under AMD64 Fedora"
- In reply to: Antti Aspinen: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Next in thread: Craig White: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Reply: Craig White: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Reply: Paul: "Re: FC1 -> FC2 Update: DISASTER!!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]