Re: Fedora Core 3 Wishlist

From: Jeff Vian (jvian10_at_charter.net)
Date: 06/06/04

  • Next message: shatam bhattacharya: "oracle 9i installations" 
    Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:41:53 -0500
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha wrote:

    >On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 01:58:04PM -0400, Tom Diehl wrote:
    >
    >
    >>On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Paul Duffy wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 17:00, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>Because you insist on using proprietary, encumbered technologies that
    >>>>would make RedHat vulnerable to legal action if they distributed them.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>As they do in the kernel source they provide.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>Think binaries. That is what matters. Do not ask me why I am not a lawyer.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Well, xmms source had mp3 support removed.
    >
    >
    Different issue AFAICT. The mp3 protocol is under different rules and
    there are different patent/copyright issues involved.

    NTFS is a filesystem that can be read by anything that can read raw data
    from the disk (all filesystems contain data on the disk so this is no
    surprise). How it is handled is the subject of their proprietary
    software, and anybody can freely develop the code to read the data, and
    even write it (if you ignore the metadata). However, 'how' the data is
    read is by handling the raw data from the disk. Even the linux NTFS
    modules are still listed as experimental and the last time I checked
    were 'read only'. As I understand it, the metadata for the filesystem
    which contains the filesystem permissions, access lists, etc., is the
    really tough stuff to handle and so NTFS as it is used by linux does not
    utilize the metadata files, but rather ignores that stuff.

    If I understand correctly, reading the data is not illegal. Writing it
    *using techniques that would not hose the filesystem* is the tough (and
    possibley illegal) part, because it would have to utilize the same
    metadata management as used by M$.

    >
    >
    >>I do not know. Ask YOUR lawyer. If your lawyer says this is wrong take it up
    >>wth Red Hat's legal department, not this list. Red Hat's legal dept. opinion
    >>is all that matters wrt inclusion of NTFS in the distro. Nothing else will
    >>get it included.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>Now, if you can adopt a less patronising attitude (as some of us don't really
    >>>have an option when it comes to not installing Windows and it doesn't always
    >>>let you format for FAT32 on install) and tell me how including it in the
    >>>kernel source but not the kernel makes a legal difference that would be much
    >>>appreciated.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>Ummm, lets see NTFS source is closed. In the USA Reverse engineering is
    >>illegal (Think DMCA).
    >>
    >>
    >
    >That's not true. Well, not globally anyway.
    >
    >
    >
    >>Red Hat is a USA based Corporation, therefore subject
    >>to the laws of the USA. Is this clear enough for you or do I need to continue
    >>explaining the obvious?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Well, I'm not in the USA. Couldn't Fedora have an International section?
    >
    >
    >
    >>If you really need this included in an Open Source
    >>distro why not get M$ to open source the NTFS file system.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Not enough. The problem here is in the patent system.
    >
    >
    >
    >>I am sure if they
    >>did that everyone would then include it in their distro. Until then if you
    >>must use this crap then you will have to recompile the modules.
    >>
    >>This is my 1 and only response to this thread. If you need a further
    >>explaination, try reading the archives. If people would at least try reading
    >>the archives b4 posting the traffic on this and most lists would be greatly
    >>reduced.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >True, it gets tiresome. Could an automatic reply system for such usual
    >cases be implemented?
    >
    >Regards,
    >Luciano Rocha
    >
    >
    > 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: shatam bhattacharya: "oracle 9i installations"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Fedora Core 3 Wishlist
      ... Do not ask me why I am not a lawyer. ... lets see NTFS source is closed. ... distro why not get M$ to open source the NTFS file system. ... the archives b4 posting the traffic on this and most lists would be greatly ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Windows and Maildir
      ... Windows NT with NTFS has both file streams and extended ... > NT whose performance with large directories is better than that of FAT. ... And there won't be much of a difference between FAT and NTFS. ... because the problem is in the filesystem format and not in the ...
      (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
    • Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows covert channel
      ... >> I seem to remember in the dim reaches of my memory a covert channel in ... allocated cluster that won't be visible through the filesystem that you can ... For NTFS, I would suggest starting at http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net which ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: Fast filesystem
      ... "Jim" wrote: ... different filesystem, or maybe tweak NTFS. ... Are there other filesystem supported by Windows XP and Vista? ... the only filesystems which XP or Vista support are FAT and NTFS. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain)
    • Re: tar whole windows partition
      ... > like NTFS. ... > particularly if you intend to write to an NTFS filesystem. ... The driver in 2.4 is unsafe for both read and write and write support ... partimage implemented its own NTFS driver. ...
      (comp.os.linux.questions)