Re: WTF: Stack Size 4k

From: Dexter Ang (thepoch_at_mydestiny.net)
Date: 06/10/04

  • Next message: M. Fioretti: "Re: Slo ...... w PC" 
    Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:40:26 +0800
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    Jeffrey D. Means wrote:
    > Then I was wondering why things are progressing downhill in Core 2
    > since I have nothing but problems in my server center since starting a
    > move to Core 2 (since stopped). First you do not have support for the
    > advansys module in the install script and have not since RH 9. How the
    > hell are those of us who use and love the SCSI boards based on the
    > advansys chipset supposed to install on systems using SCSI drives
    > attached to those cards? I have several boxes with advansys cards in
    > them with drives attached. Next you did not allow me to recompile my
    > kernel with the 8k stack size by choosing to not allow that as an option
    > in the build menu I had to go DL a new kernel source to rebuild my
    > kernel with this option(Bugs: 120446 124018 111232). I want a distro
    > that simplifies my life as an administrator not makes things orders of
    > magnitude more difficult!
    >

    Well, first of all you could have chosen not to be so rude about it.
    Second, why not try other distros? You could try slackware, where I'm
    sure you can recompile your kernel as you wish. You could try debian,
    which I hear has a very good apt-get setup for easy updates. Third, you
    are moving your server center to FC2 without researching or testing
    first? From my view, the distro isn't at fault here. Always research
    before moving forward. If it's critical servers you're trying to
    upgrade, what feature of FC2 do you need exactly? Figure all these out
    first, then try and complain.

    dex 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: M. Fioretti: "Re: Slo ...... w PC"

    Relevant Pages

    • NFS problems with through 2.5.x to 2.6.0-test9
      ... When the server is running the ... kernel, as a client the 2.6 series seem to work perfectly, excluding ... Interesting problem arose when I attempted switch the server's kernel to ... with and without nfsv4 support compiled in (was considering testing it at ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • [Summary] SunRay server failure
      ... SunRay Server Software 1.3 ... Kernel: panic: AutoRenewDHCP: IPA lease expired -- must restart ...
      (SunManagers)
    • Re: FC14 to FC15 Preinstall stuck, replond.xml and repos NOT updated!
      ... server, web server, ftp server, router, desktops, and had a lot of fun, ... I never want to hear that "Dump Fedora" stuff ... system to at least run an FC15 kernel so I can get back into X again. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: NFS EINVAL on open(... | O_TRUNC) on 2.6.23.9
      ... The bug (userspace server side i would say at this point) is well described from the author of an nfs-user-server patch which has not been managed yet. ... The nfs patch is of course waiting for commit since august, ... What isn't quite clear to me is whether this commit causes your user- space server to start failing suddenly, or it causes the client to start sending the special non-standard time stamps in the SETATTR request. ... it would be helpful if you could run this test with a constant kernel version on one side while varying it on the other. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • RE: Linux 2.6.8-rc4 "Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!" - af ter replacing /fadsroot
      ... In my previous e-mail I forgot to mention that on the remote NFS Linux ... I am booting with ramdisk as root filesystem server and then trying to ... PowerPC Linux Kernel Image ...
      (Linux-Kernel)