Re: FC2 Issues

From: Edward Croft (ecroft_at_OPENRATINGS.com)
Date: 06/15/04

  • Next message: Wayne Steenburg: "Re: How to disable beep altogether"
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:28:44 -0400
    
    

    On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 13:10, srb wrote:
    > > Redhat has been my linux of choice for 6 years
    > ......
    > > Get your act together re-release new ISOs that
    > > fix these 2 problems within 2 weeks or you are costing redhat an estimated
    > > 50k/yr in licenses that I control. We will be moving to Novell/Suse.
    > > Thank you,
    > > Tom Christensen
    >
    > Why don't you just use Redhat then? From what I understand, Fedora is a
    > public testing platform... Redhat is the stable version.
    >
    > - - s r b - -
    > /mnt/this!

    Because he has a point. Granted this is provided free and is supposed to
    be cutting edge, but these were two known deficiencies. I have been
    bitten by the dual boot bug. With help from many here and elsewhere,
    thanks Sean, I will get it back working, but we shouldn't have had to
    deal with that with a "release" version. Are we to treat all versions of
    Fedora as release candidates and not true released product? I have been
    working with RH since 99. I run RHAS on my production, but have been
    testing Fedora on the workstation side. I use Fedora at home. I liked
    Core 1. It was fairly solid, a few minor bugs, but stable. Core 2 hosed
    my XP partition and I have had a few other niggling things. I work
    through them, but as he stated, this is the release, not test version.
    The dual boot issue and a motherboard issue are major issues that should
    have been show stoppers. As stated, this can cause a black eye to the
    distribution and to Red Hat by inference. While I greatly anticipated
    the Core 2 release for the 2.6 kernel, I would have bided my time if it
    had been announced that there were a couple of issues and the release
    was pushed off. I am hoping that real testing takes place with Core 3
    and that it is not released with major issues still hanging, just to
    release it.
    I will stand by Core 2 and will work through the issues. I just hope
    that this haphazard style of release does not become the norm.

    -- 
    Edward M. Croft
    Sr. Systems Engineer
    Open Ratings, Inc.
    200 West Street
    Waltham, MA 02451-1121
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Wayne Steenburg: "Re: How to disable beep altogether"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: what packages r added to b labeled as fedora core
      ... ashwin kesavan iyengar wrote: ... | I once remember reading the official fedora web-site that fedora ... |core is community based edition and Redhat will use fedora as proving ... |core and some details about these packages. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: what packages r added to b labeled as fedora core
      ... > ashwin kesavan iyengar wrote: ... > | I once remember reading the official fedora web-site that fedora ... > |core is community based edition and Redhat will use fedora as proving ... > |core and some details about these packages. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Python NPTL Sockets
      ... I had a problem not to long ago when I switched from RedHat 9 to Fedora ... Core 1. ... of the python socket module. ...
      (comp.lang.python)
    • Re: Installing or updating?
      ... >> I have a RedHat 6.0 installed and I want to know if install the Fedora ... Fedora Core 4 just came out yesterday, it might be a good idea to ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: Understanding iptables FC4
      ... > If any of you have set this up on Fedora 4 that would be great. ... went from redhat 9 to fedora core 3. ... vsftpd FTP server, had apache setup for my web server, then added user ... Instead of using telnet, I used ...
      (alt.os.linux)