Re: libpnm.so.9 and xplanet

From: Globe Trotter (itsme_410_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/18/04

  • Next message: q=AF=B2=A8?=: "How to solve the problem "Error while mapping shared library sections" when using gdb???" 
    Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 06:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    --- "Christopher K. Johnson" <ckjohnson@gwi.net> wrote:
    > Globe Trotter wrote:
    >
    > >I get the following: I am not sure what it means -- I am really confused
    > >because netpbm is installed.
    > >
    > >
    > ># rpm -V $(rpm -qf $(which xplanet))
    > >package /usr/local/bin/xplanet is not installed
    > >package is is not installed
    > >package not is not installed
    > >package owned is not installed
    > >package by is not installed
    > >package any is not installed
    > >package package is not installed
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > $(which xplanet) yielded "/usr/local/bin/xplanet"
    > $(rpm -qf /usr/local/bin/xplanet) yielded "/usr/local/bin/xplanet is not
    > owned by any package"
    > So the final command was: rpm -V /usr/local/bin/xplanet is not owned by
    > any package
    > Which of course tried to verify each whitespace delimited package name,
    > yeilding all the claims that those packages are not installed.
    >
    > Looks like perhaps xplanet was not installed using rpm. You will have
    > to provide more details about how you installed xplanet...
    >

    No, I did. I must say that I had mistakenly used the rpm commands on the
    .src.rpm as follows:

    rpm -Uvh xplanet-maps-1.0-2.fr.src.rpm
    rpm -Uvh xplanet-1.0.8-1.1.fc2.fr.src.rpm

    the realizing what I had done, removed it, using:

    rpm -e xplanet-maps
    rpm -e xplanet

    and then gone and installed the i386 rpms from freshrpms:

    rpm -Uvh xplanet-1.0.8-1.1.fc2.fr.i386.rpm xplanet-maps-1.0-2.fr.noarch.rpm
    warning: xplanet-1.0.8-1.1.fc2.fr.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
    e42d547b
    Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
       1:xplanet-maps ########################################### [ 50%]
       2:xplanet ########################################### [100%]

    What should I do?

    Many thanks, and best wishes!

                    
    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
    http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: q=AF=B2=A8?=: "How to solve the problem "Error while mapping shared library sections" when using gdb???"

    Relevant Pages

    • [PATCH 1/2] kbuil: add deb-pkg target
      ... # To prepare kbuild for more kernel packaging formats move all packaging ... # In top-level Makefile introduce generic support for all package ... Included the old rpm target for backward ... # and builddeb scripts. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Conventions for NFS sharing of binaries
      ... Do you have distro & local packages with same name? ... mount it r/w on your "master installation machine" (with RPM management). ... If you replace a package with a different one with the same name, hmm, you ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Re: ./configure command
      ... The package is not available. ... machines which don't even have an OS at all, let alone RPM, ... There is not a "the tool to package and install on Fedora". ... If he wants to avoid trouble, ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Backing up whole system
      ... Amanda is packaged by Fedora and if Gene feels that the packages are ... fedora's rpm is/was incapable of handling the nuances of using only enough ... When an rpm package can build a complete user from scratch, ... Do you really believe that rpm can install every package under the sun, ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Redhat to Freebsd
      ... >>researching security updates or in performing kernel or package updates. ... >>I assume it is only the Redhat distro that has the ease of RPM installation? ... So you can build from sources with ports, or install binaries ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)