Re: lame servers resolving
From: Alexander Dalloz (alexander.dalloz_at_uni-bielefeld.de)
Date: 06/29/04
- Previous message: Mike Klinke: "Re: OT What would be the best script type"
- In reply to: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell: "Re: lame servers resolving"
- Next in thread: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell: "Re: lame servers resolving"
- Reply: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell: "Re: lame servers resolving"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:43:41 +0200 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Am Mo, den 28.06.2004 schrieb T. Nifty Hat Mitchell um 22:23:
Hi Tom!
> How do you filter lame-server messages so you can discover
> problems with your own domain and toss those that are out
> of your control?
>
> My practice when I had responsibility of a large name space was to not
> filter any errors going into the logs. When scanning the logs I would
> often build filters on the fly and verify that none of the errors
> had their root cause in anything I had responsibility for.
>
> On boxes that were a consumer of DNS data then filtering this error
> might be ok. i.e. a local caching name server (SOA for
> localhost.localdomain and look up all the rest). No filters on mail
> relays and MX hosts that might hide a problem.
> T o m M i t c h e l l
> /dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.
Your warning is correct and rereading my reply to Olga's question was in
the sense of your arguments a bit unresponsible. Of course lame server
notifications have their sense. So instead of directing a lame server
messages to /dev/null it is a good decision to log them to a separate
logfile. A possible setup to do so would be in the named.conf:
logging {
channel lamers {
file "/var/log/lamer.log" versions 4 size 1m;
severity info;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
category lame-servers {
lamers;
};
};
Such a log can be quickly grepped for notifications caused by own
errors.
Alexander
-- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435 Serendipity 15:35:26 up 2 days, 17:22, load average: 0.59, 0.26, 0.18
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- Previous message: Mike Klinke: "Re: OT What would be the best script type"
- In reply to: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell: "Re: lame servers resolving"
- Next in thread: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell: "Re: lame servers resolving"
- Reply: T. Nifty Hat Mitchell: "Re: lame servers resolving"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|