Re: Serial ATA and UDMA
From: Jonathan Rawle (jr36_at_leicester.ac.uk)
Date: 06/30/04
- Previous message: akonstam_at_trinity.edu: "Re: FC1 va nVidia Latest Driver"
- In reply to: James Wilkinson: "Re: Serial ATA and UDMA"
- Next in thread: James Wilkinson: "Re: Serial ATA and UDMA"
- Reply: James Wilkinson: "Re: Serial ATA and UDMA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:28:58 +0100
James Wilkinson wrote:
> Perhaps more to the point, you'll be doing extremely well to get more
> than 60-70 MB/s out of the current generation of hard drives. IIRC, a
> number of manufacturers are still on ATA100 simply due to this
> limitation.
> My advice? If you've got decent hard drive performance, be happy. If
> not, something else is wrong.
>
If 54 MB/s decent performance? (Output from hdparm -t)
I realise the best way to increase performance is to have more than one
drive, even without RAID. I briefly had my home partition on a different
drive, and the system was noticeably faster. However, my main aim is to
make my system as quiet as possible, so two drives isn't the best solution!
I was just curious as to why the log showed those messages about ATA/133!
Jonathan
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: akonstam_at_trinity.edu: "Re: FC1 va nVidia Latest Driver"
- In reply to: James Wilkinson: "Re: Serial ATA and UDMA"
- Next in thread: James Wilkinson: "Re: Serial ATA and UDMA"
- Reply: James Wilkinson: "Re: Serial ATA and UDMA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|