Re: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9
From: Gregory Gulik (greg_at_gulik.org)
Date: 06/30/04
- Previous message: Yang Xiao: "RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- In reply to: Yang Xiao: "RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- Next in thread: Yang Xiao: "RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:26:59 -0500 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Ah, good point, but upon checking:
Client:
eth0: VIA VT6102 Rhine-II at 0xe8800000, 00:0c:6e:ec:87:0f, IRQ 10.
eth0: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x786d advertising 01e1 Link 41e1.
eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 41e1.
Server:
eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
I checked both switches and those links are both being indicated as
full-duplex.
Here's another data point. I used scp to copy the same 11MB file that
that took 1.7 seconds. That's really pointing at an NFS problem rather
than a network problem.
Yang Xiao wrote:
> Hi,
> Are you sure they are all running at 100/FULL? Try set both interfaces to
> 100/FULL instead of AUTO.
> Yang
-- Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/ greg @ gulik.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Yang Xiao: "RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- In reply to: Yang Xiao: "RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- Next in thread: Yang Xiao: "RE: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|