Re: latex2html
From: Tim Waugh (twaugh_at_redhat.com)
Date: 06/30/04
- Previous message: Gregory Gulik: "Re: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- In reply to: Ed Hill: "Re: latex2html"
- Next in thread: Ed Hill: "Re: latex2html"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:27:51 +0100 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:13:29PM -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
> > This is the first time I've even heard of this problem. An indicator
> > of the size of the userbase for the latex2html we ship?
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Yes, I agree that latex2html users are few in number. But does that
> make us worthless? I hope not! ;-)
My point was more that perhaps latex2html users don't use the
latex2html that we actually ship, but a different version.
> If I can get any better results, I will be sure to forward the patches.
Great, thanks for helping out!
Tim.
*/
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Gregory Gulik: "Re: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9"
- In reply to: Ed Hill: "Re: latex2html"
- Next in thread: Ed Hill: "Re: latex2html"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]