Re: nvidia users: about the xorg-x11 update
From: Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm_at_ATrpms.net)
Date: 07/08/04
- Previous message: Tom Diehl: "Re: RPM vs source install..."
- In reply to: Jack Spaar: "Re: nvidia users: about the xorg-x11 update"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 12:16:16 +0200 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:19:10PM -0700, Jack Spaar wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 13:09:28 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 01:21:35PM -0700, Jack Spaar wrote:
> ...
> >>
> >> I wish there was some rpm-savvy way for nvidia's installer to handle
> >> this situation.]
> >
> > You mean like http://ATrpms.net/name/nvidia-graphics/ ? ;)
> >
> > No messing with library or Mesa rpm replacement, and you can even have
> > multiple nvidia drivers installed in parallel.
>
>
> Thanks Axel! Where would we be without community packagers?
>
> A question -- the description at:
> <http://atrpms.net/dist/fc2/nvidia-graphics/nvidia-graphics6106-1.0_6106-59.rhfc2.at.i386.rpm.html>
>
> says "You must also install a matching kernel-module-nvidia-graphics6106 rpm, if you want to
> utilize these drivers." But I don't see a kernel-module-nvidia*6106*.rpm
> in <http://download.atrpms.net/production/packages/fedora-2-i386/atrpms/>
>
> Am I looking at the wrong place?
Ooops, no, right place, but modules were wiped out in accident (while
pruning kernel modules for phased out kernels). Check again in an
hour.
Thanks for reporting!
-- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Tom Diehl: "Re: RPM vs source install..."
- In reply to: Jack Spaar: "Re: nvidia users: about the xorg-x11 update"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]