Re: yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity
From: Daniel Stonier (snorri_dj_at_operamail.com)
Date: 07/14/04
- Previous message: vlad i.: "Re: installing fedora iso"
- In reply to: John McBride: "yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity"
- Next in thread: John McBride: "Re: yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity"
- Reply: John McBride: "Re: yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:23:58 +1000
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:38:45 -0700, John McBride <jmcbride@ccis.com> wrote:
> Just curious...what is the rationale of forcing new installs every 6
> mos. as opposed to having some type of "yum flavoring" like
> debian...unstable, testing, stable type of thing? Then just have
> "fedora" and a "fresh" set of cd's (requiring less download for update
> than an older set).
>
> The reason I ask is more and more people seem to be saying "fedora is
> the equivalent of debian unstable"...but it seems to me that fedora was
> portrayed as a usable desktop/server system when the project was started.
>
> If this is not considered "reasonably stable software" and the only
> choice is RHEL, well, I don't like it. I think that's an awfully large
> gap to fill.
>
> My personal experience is (having used at least three distros for months
> or years apiece) fedora seems to be pretty usable and likable. Just not
> sure I like the "wipe and reinstall" every six months.
>
> I'm sure your opinion may differ...not that it takes that long to wipe
> and reinstall, but redoing all the NIS, samba, cvs, dhcpd, etc. every
> six months is probably a drag on admins.
Im certainly not sure of all the details, but I imagine a seamlessly
working
updatable is a big step to run flawlessly. Maybe there's issues with
getting
this working. Upgrading from one version of rh distro to the next has never
been always free of problems. Still, I agree - this sort of setup would be
nice
but would take man hours away from developing a testing distro which is I
think Fedora's main goal.
There's also the philosophy of keeping up with the Jones'. I'm not really
fussed on upgrading every six months, but is there a need? For some people
probably, but I started with rh7.3 and rh8.0 which came out a couple of
weeks
later. Once I'd customised that and learned how to samba, nat, apache,
iptables etc
I didn't have any real need to upgrade to rh9.0 - I was happy with it the
way it was. The
couple of applications I did need to upgrade usually weren't very
difficult to do
manually. I skipped to FC1 at the start of this year when my motherboard
bombed
and must admit I do like it, but now that I have it happily chugging along
I dont think
I'll install again till FC3 - except perhaps for a poke around in FC2 for
interest sake.
Cheers,
Daniel.
-- email:snorri_dj@operamail.com http://members.optusnet.com.au/stonierd/ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: vlad i.: "Re: installing fedora iso"
- In reply to: John McBride: "yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity"
- Next in thread: John McBride: "Re: yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity"
- Reply: John McBride: "Re: yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|