Re: Anti Virus Software for FC1

From: Kyrre Ness Sjobak (kyrre_at_solution-forge.net)
Date: 08/03/04

  • Next message: Shane Steinhobel: "Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19"
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:29:12 +0200
    
    

    You probably knew already, but you really don't need anti-virus for
    Linux - The developers acctually closes the holes the viruses are
    crawling throug, instead of creating a market by letting 3. parties
    create programs which serach and destroy them AFTER they got into the
    system...

    So if you are planning to install anti-virus on Linux, you are setting
    up a server for windows boxes to put their files on, and want to clean
    them for viruses from an unaffected location.

    Then there is the new market-destroyer from MS - the MS antivirus! It is
    designed to work without updation. Yeah right. I've tried THAT before.
    The virus gets in, makes som noise, and the antivirus program
    understands it an zapps it. Thats how it supposed to be. In reality they
    get in, sneak around, shoot the anti-virus before it understands whats
    going on (with ONE package on the market that just got 10x easyer...),
    and then f**** you entire box.

    Something they got to do to sell Longhorn, which is (as far as i've
    heard) just a sloooooooow and heavily overated new word for "bug".

    Kyrre Ness Sjøbæk

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Shane Steinhobel: "Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: The Myth of the secure Mac
      ... > Look for viruses for Win 64. ... NOW disprove Oxford with something else. ... Linux viruses in the last 5 years - even though Linux had lower market ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Only a matter of time
      ... >>>Linux gets more viruses. ... >>>relative market share situation which is responsible for the disparity ... >>>between the number of viruses on Windows and the number on Mac OS X. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Only a matter of time
      ... >>>Does Linux have viruses? ... > relative market share situation which is responsible for the disparity ... > between the number of viruses on Windows and the number on Mac OS X. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Only a matter of time
      ... >> Linux gets more viruses. ... >> relative market share situation which is responsible for the disparity ... >> between the number of viruses on Windows and the number on Mac OS X. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Only a matter of time
      ... >>>Linux gets more viruses. ... >>>relative market share situation which is responsible for the disparity ... >>>between the number of viruses on Windows and the number on Mac OS X. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)

    Loading