Re: maximum mount count
From: Ed Sawicki (ed_at_alcpress.com)
Date: 08/08/04
- Previous message: J.L. Coenders: "Re: KDE shutdown"
- In reply to: David L Norris: "Re: maximum mount count"
- Next in thread: Thomas Cameron: "Re: maximum mount count"
- Reply: Thomas Cameron: "Re: maximum mount count"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 23:44:08 -0700 To: dave@webaugur.com, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
David L Norris wrote:
>On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 14:51 -0700, alan wrote:
>
>
>>On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Ed Sawicki wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm running Fedora Core 2. dumpe2fs tells me that the
>>>maximum mount count of the root partition is "-1". The
>>>dumpe2fs man page doesn't document what -1 means.
>>>Does someone here know?
>>>
>>>
>
>-1 is your maximum mount count. -1 effectively means "never force a
>check based on the mount count."
>
>
So, -1 is the same as zero it seems.
>
>
>>>If I adjust the maximum mount count to force the root
>>>file system to be checked on the next boot, the check fails.
>>>
>>>
>
>Fails how? Fails as in doesn't run? Or fails as in says the filesystem
>is corrupt?
>
>
The latter. It says the filesystem is corrupt.
>>>Yet, when I check that partition with Slackware, it checks
>>>OK. Does someone know why this happens?
>>>
>>>
>>Maybe it is set to "never check"?
>>
>>
>
>The check must be forced if the filesystem was cleanly unmounted.
>
>
>
No, I run fsck manually with Slackware and it works - the filesystem
is OK. Yet, Fedora sees the filesystem as corrupt.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: J.L. Coenders: "Re: KDE shutdown"
- In reply to: David L Norris: "Re: maximum mount count"
- Next in thread: Thomas Cameron: "Re: maximum mount count"
- Reply: Thomas Cameron: "Re: maximum mount count"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|