OT: Grammar (was Re: Re: [Fedora] Re: Help me find 5 mistakes and than solution to thoes mistakes!)

From: Aaron Gaudio (prothonotar_at_tarnation.dyndns.org)
Date: 08/21/04

  • Next message: david walcroft: "Re: no audio with Quicktime video streams"
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:49:51 -0400
    
    

    On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 16:07 -0700, Scott Talbot wrote:

    > Just curious as to why we must use proper Latin grammar just because we
    > borrowed the word from them? It's not like anyone speaks the language
    > anymore. Do we also learn the grammar of every other language we borrow
    > words from. Judging by this list, few of us even know English grammar.

    True. "Viruses" (the supposed correct pluralization of "virus") is
    obviously also not from latin. I think the rationale behind not
    accepting "viri" is that using "-i" to pluralize is uncommon and
    reserved only for words which inherited it from Latin. Since the
    "standard" (if anything in English is standard) way of pluralizing is to
    add -s or -es to the end of the word, that is to be preferred.

    >
    > > But I guess the really important thing is that someone understands you.
    > > If they can correct you when you say "virii" then you probably got your
    > > message across. :)
    >
    > Possibly the smartest off topic sentence seen here today!
    >

    Heh heh thanks. Don't try using that argument on the French though!

    -- 
    Aaron Gaudio <prothonotar@tarnation.dyndns.org>
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: david walcroft: "Re: no audio with Quicktime video streams"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Is C99 the final C? (some suggestions)
      ... > that someone will try compile their stuff on an old compiler. ... > because the ANSI standard obsoleted them, and everyone picked up the ANSI ... fixed by using another language. ... >>are multiplying two expressions of the widest type supported by your ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
      ... They could have standardized that the language would be ... getting the facts wrong anyway. ... And the answer, for the Schildt books, is that they consistently produced ... to C start with the standard. ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • Re: Two Questions about "strlen", "strcat" and "strcpy"
      ... >> No. zero terminated strings is the whole problem in the first place. ... > OR length prefixed strings the language would retain compatibility ... is not easily duplicated with the old standard then it will foster interest. ... The C standards committee is dead. ...
      (comp.lang.c)
    • Re: Forth Frustrations
      ... How would they even know what they are without being language lawyers? ... standard systems and a large number of nonstandard ones. ... interpreter, ... They set up four states -- HOST INTERPRETER COMPILER ...
      (comp.lang.forth)
    • Re: Is C99 the final C? (some suggestions)
      ... >> because the ANSI standard obsoleted them, and everyone picked up the ANSI ... > fixed by using another language. ... programmers managing the meaning of the symbols for more generic operators. ... According to a paper by Intel, widening multiply accounts for something like ...
      (comp.lang.c)

    Loading