Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower
From: Ow Mun Heng (Ow.Mun.Heng_at_wdc.com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Previous message: Ow Mun Heng: "Re: Kernel with Suspend to Disk support"
- In reply to: Trevor Smith: "Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower"
- Next in thread: Trevor Smith: "Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower"
- Reply: Trevor Smith: "Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:34:00 +0800 on neuromancer.home.net
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 11:17, Trevor Smith wrote:
> On September 16, 2004 10:02 pm, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > I'm running on an Hitachi/IBM 5400rpm 80GB 8MB Cache and I get
> >
> > /dev/hda:
> > Timing buffer-cache reads: 1284 MB in 2.00 seconds = 641.46 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 106 MB in 3.05 seconds = 34.78 MB/sec
>
> I've got some sort of 40 GB 4200RPM (don't know how much cache) disk in my
> laptop and I'm getting:
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing buffer-cache reads: 420 MB in 2.01 seconds = 209.20 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 34 MB in 3.10 seconds = 10.97 MB/sec
This must be an old laptop which does not have ATA100 or something like
that. I get that kind of speed my my old but trusty Dell 166MMX w 72MB
ram on RH8
>
> changes to hdparm make no difference in the above stats.
>
> --
> Trevor Smith // trevor@haligonian.com
-- Ow Mun Heng Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 on D600 1.4Ghz CPU kernel 2.6.7-2.jul1-interactive Neuromancer 18:43:21 up 21:56, 2 users, load average: 0.72, 2.24, 2.28 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Ow Mun Heng: "Re: Kernel with Suspend to Disk support"
- In reply to: Trevor Smith: "Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower"
- Next in thread: Trevor Smith: "Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower"
- Reply: Trevor Smith: "Re: FC2 + newest openoffice = slower"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
