RE: fc on hp with itanium 64 bit

From: Shaffer, Paul D (paul.d.shaffer_at_lmco.com)
Date: 10/07/04

  • Next message: Graham Cossey: "RE: How to remove [exim's] "On Behalf Of" ?"
    Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:05:09 -0600
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Don't know your personal perspective James, but if you were aware of the
    bigger picture, you would see that there is a tremendous demand for
    Linux on IA-64.

    http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_releases/2003/may/madison
    .html

    We are porting some major stuff right now, which I cannot discuss.
    Fedora is obviously not a player at this stage, but to dismiss
    Jeetendra's inquiry as you did does a major disservice to the community.

    v/r

    Paul D. Shaffer, RHCT, CNA
    System Security Officer
    Lockheed Martin Information Systems and Solutions
    work: (720) 662-5240
    cell: (303) 809-1002
    pager: (877) 609-1802
    "The more noise a man or a motor makes the less power there is
    available." -- W.R. McGeary

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com
    [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of James Wilkinson
    Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:43 AM
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    Subject: Re: fc on hp with itanium 64 bit

    Jeetendra Mirchandani wrote:
    > Is FC not supported on hp server with Itanium Processer
    >
    > this is the mail i got from HP support. Is this true?
    >
    >
    > ------------------
    > Chkd with our engineer this version is not compatible with the
    > server(rx2600).The only versions that will work are Red
    > Hat Linux Advanced Server ver 2.1 or ver 3
    >
    > Pls arrange for the either of these compatible versions to carry out
    > the
    > activity.
    > -------------------

    Right. Firstly, "supported" in this case means "supported by HP
    technical support".

    Secondly, it *might*, in theory, be possible to install x86 Fedora using
    the Itanium's 32 bit compatibility mode. Never having used Itaniums, I
    wouldn't know. I suspect that since Itaniums are surrounded by unusual
    hardware, you will run into difficulties.

    You would certainly not be able to run IA64 native binaries, and find
    that you had turned your expensive computer into a slow PC.

    Thirdly, IA64 CDs are not listed on the main Fedora download page. This
    means that, at best, you would be looking at a somewhat non-standard
    system.

    To be honest, unless you're interested in helping out porting Fedora to
    IA64, I'd recommend that you grab a build of White Box Linux or one of
    the other RHEL repackagers.

    The nearest you'l get to Fedora on IA64 is the "Rawhide" development
    builds. This is currently somewhere between FC3T2 and FC3T3 (since FC3T3
    will be taken from it) and does have IA64 builds, but may trash your
    filesystem every so often.

    Sorry I can't be of any more help, but it doesn't look like there's much
    demand for Linux on IA64 now, and it doesn't look as though there'll be
    much in the future, either. You're going to be fairly alone, in any
    case:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/24/hp_ends_workstations/ ("HP
    knifes Itanium, cans IA-64 workstations")
    http://theinquirer.net/?article=18688 ("Itanium unsuitable for
    workstations, Intel says")

    James.

    -- 
    E-mail address: james | ... where the teams bring a completely new
    definition @westexe.demon.co.uk  | to the word 'entertainment', while
    retaining the full,
                          | original meaning of the words 'total' and
    'rubbish'...
                          |     -- "I'm Sorry, I Haven't A Clue", BBC Radio
    4
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Graham Cossey: "RE: How to remove [exim's] "On Behalf Of" ?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: fc on hp with itanium 64 bit
      ... > Is FC not supported on hp server with Itanium Processer ... > this is the mail i got from HP support. ... IA64 CDs are not listed on the main Fedora download page. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: problem installing fedora 2 x86-64 on a intel xeon 64 bits
      ... >> I also would guess the chipsets to support that are very new. ... > Itanium range, and billions more on support for it. ... > Intel has been carefully attempting to preserve sales on its 32 bit Xeon ... > HyperTransport and the NUMA memory architecture), ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Gartner wakes up company executives to X86-64 scalability
      ... Add $50% /CPU for RAC clustering sw. ... And without getting too far into Oracle pricing black-magic - last I checked Oracle licenses were cheaper for multi-core X64 than the cost to achieve a similar Oracle benchmark on currently available Itanium systems. ... The year before last we heavily discussed with HP sales reps, HP technicans and SAP what road to choose. ... We have several multi-core systems as well - and they are performing exceedinly better than the IA64 ones; especially when it comes to java. ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: OT: Intel Demos 48-Core Prototype Chip
      ... of Itanium updates makes me think Intel is treating Itanium like a ... So, by the time the next IA64 comes out, people are likely to yawn at ... a similar case could be made for Intel. ... Intel thought AMD would only make incremental changes to their ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: HP wasting millions of dollars on itanium!
      ... And shareholders do not want HP to jeoperdise its own profits just to support a mistake made many years ago. ... And because of the continued media portrayal as a mistake on the hells of being retured, it is also a very unattractive platfor that new customers are not interested in moving to. ... Considering that VAX development, except perhaps for DCPS has come to a standstill, all those support contracts HP still has for the 100k vax customers are just raw profit. ... It is the support of that IA64 aberration which is not profitable because you have so few customers on that platform, and it is costly because of its totally different compilers etc etc etc. ...
      (comp.os.vms)