Re: Fedora Core 3 test 2 performance

From: Nifty Hat Mitch (mitch48_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 10/08/04

  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: fedora hosting question"
    Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:50:03 -0700
    To: Glenn Stauffer <alaxsxaq@gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:19:49AM -0400, Glenn Stauffer wrote:
    ....
    > The drive is an IBM Travelstar 60gb 5400 rpm hard drive.
    >
    > I booted into single user mode and did some testing
    .....
    > So, I guess at 16.97 MB/sec in runlevel 5, I'm seeing about the best I
    > can expect from this drive. At least with more or less standard
    > hdparm settings.
    ....
    > So, I'm getting sufficient performance from the drives now, but
    > startup still takes about 4 minutes from entering my password.
    ....
    > Puzzling!

    Yep puzzling...

    Just curious what about readahead_early and readahead
    on your system...

        # chkconfig --list | egrep "read|nscd"
        readahead_early 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:on 6:off
        readahead 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:on 6:off
        nscd 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off

    IMO, nscd is always a good idea.

    /etc/readahead.files and /etc/readahead.early.files contain
    a gazillion files and may be helping or hurting depending on
    your DRAM. There is about 120MB of bits so boxes with less
    than 256MB of DRAM may find the list a bit long.

    It is not silly for some folks to look at system 'lsof' listings and
    build lists of files that can be used with /usr/sbin/readahead to keep
    'important' files cached memory. Perhaps a cron job.

    For me it is things like 'emacs' load time variability that
    made me look at this or keep a copy of emacs up in another
    window.

    Classic Unixes once used a sticky bit and some other tricks
    to this end. Pick a select set of files that is 1/3 of DRAM memory
    or less and tinker.

    Try your .login.bashrc might have a small readahead task that
    can help the scheduler and IO system do what you need.

    I you login, then logout then login quickly a second time
    does the time change.

    Like I say tinker.

    Also the BIGGEST slow down for most people is DNS.
    Make sure that DNS host name resolution is quick.
    See nscd and inspect /etc/hosts, /etc/resolv.conf,
    /etc/host.conf.

    Search the archives on how to turn off IPV6, IPV6 DNS lookups
    can be slow as they often time out.

    -- 
    	T o m  M i t c h e l l 
    	Me, I would "Rather" Not.
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: fedora hosting question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Domain Controllers
      ... The configuration shows an alternate DNS address of 4.2.2.2. ... The computers that have the problem are the ones that do ... > Although...you should point to another DNS server for redundancy. ... >> Computers on the network are having issues keeping drives mapped. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Fwd: Wiping Out Data
      ... and portable drives. ... which lists just some of the scenarios where shred ... If you truly care about setting the record straight you'd retract your ... I rather suspect you're not grownup enough to do either though. ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: 2.4.23+atalib2 sil3112A write errors
      ... I'm now suspecting hardware errors. ... > I'm seeing silent write errors with two Seagate 160GB drives on a ... > source and destination and sorted and compaired the lists. ... On fscking the disks some inodes were found corrupted. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Fedora May Be Killing Your Laptops Hard Drive?
      ... been discussed in fedora-devel list in detail and Fedora weekly news ... command over the last few minutes: ... above URI), the other day, seemed to suggest that the drives were being ... I read messages from the public lists. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Expectations in UPgrade from NT4 to Win2K/2003 Srv
      ... NT coming over (as I recall) can be expanded to 8GBs and so ... on several workstations clones I did once - nice to have the 'old' drives still onboard) I'll enlarge the copied over to '4GB' partition ... Understand what you say about the 'naming' of DNS - I guess that I should've said, "we have an external domain named www.whydoyouask.org ... you don't care what the internal domain ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)