Re: Apt repos of fc3 test3 (yum is too slow)

From: Panu Matilainen (pmatilai_at_welho.com)
Date: 10/14/04

  • Next message: Lars E. Pettersson: "Re: snmp broken in FC2"
    Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:37:16 +0300 (EEST)
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Mike Perry wrote:

    > Do any apt repositories exist for core 3 test 3 yet?

    Freshrpms has apt repository for the development (aka rawhide) tree of
    Fedora which allows you to keep up with updates:
    "rpm http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux development/i386 core"
    in apt's sources.list ought to do it.

    >
    > Also, could somebody please tell me why it is that yum was selected
    > for the default package upgrade mechanism? I would have expected there
    > to have been many flame wars on this, but searching google only
    > reveals a few offhand remarks.

    Yes, there have been rather endless "discussions" about the topic. Lets
    not go there again.

    >
    > It seems to me if any kind of speed is desired, yum is broken by
    > design. Keeping each package header in a separate file prevents TCP
    > slow start from ever reaching the bandwidth of your link since a new
    > connection must be established for each file. Hence a yum update can
    > take ages, even on extremely fast internet connections.
    >
    > Is it possible for yum to download all headers in a single archive
    > file to speed things up?

    Yum in FC3test3 is a LOT faster than it was on FC2. Still can't beat apt
    but the new XML metadata is probably a lot slower to process than what apt
    natively uses, it's going to be interesting to see how apt compares once
    the new metadata support gets added into it.

            - -Panu -

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Lars E. Pettersson: "Re: snmp broken in FC2"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: RedHat finally screws up2date customers over...
      ... >> Anyone know what Fedora installs with by default Yum, ... > it looks on their webpage to be apt + the synaptic gui ...
      (linux.redhat)
    • Re: OT: Apt-get vs YUM?
      ... Yum: Has least built-in features of the three package managers ... Apt: A well integrated product with more built-in features than yum. ... apt does not have prioritization of repositories. ... go out of one's way to install smart and configure third-party ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Apt Problem.
      ... > and using apt for fedora. ... You probably downloaded apt from Fedora Extras. ... Get the latest package from ... yum is easy to use. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Apt-get really screwed up on F9
      ... Hit http://download.fedora.redhat.com fedora/linux/updates/9/i386.newkey/ ... I've had to do a yum update to update F9, which went ok, but what the hell has ... I have to say that I'm really annoyed with this, as I've been using apt since ... I think it's about time to say goodbye to new versions of Fedora. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: yum vs. apt
      ... > YUM Advantages: ... YUM repositories are much easier to create on demand.) ... > Isn't compatible with APT. ... > Automated package rebuilding from SRPMS. ...
      (Fedora)