Fwd: missing X11 when configuring mplayer

From: kockkin ko (kockkinko_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/21/04

  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Problems with httpd after upgrating to FC3"
    Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:24:27 +0800
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com, ad+lists@uni-x.org
    
    
    

    The problem was Incompatible libXext in amd64 FC3 with mplayer. It is
    not missing X11. the subject is misleading. After some investigation,
    I confirmed that.
    Let me thank Alexander again for his reply.

    I found out the issue from the following investigation:
    Do a YUM update with my FC3 installation, I got more than 300 packages
    + all xorg-x11 amd64 rpm packages. I also noticed the packages
    including non 64bit version - i386.
    YUM did an installation at the end with a completion station.
    After the installation, I started to re-do .cofigure. I got the same
    error: "Incompatible Xext lib". The Xext was newly compiled at Nov
    20th,
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 20 23:02 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so
    -> libXext.so.6.4
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 20 23:00
    /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 -> libXext.so.6.4

    I went to my P4 stations, where I got a copy of FC3, did the
    installation of mplayer. the configure has not issue and the
    installation went well.

    Well now I could only watch my famous movie "mansfield park" at my P4
    4xAGP station, but not at my amd64 8xAGP station.... :(

    regards,

    kockkin ko
    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@uni-x.org>
    Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:55:53 +0100
    Subject: Re: missing X11 when configuring mplayer
    To: kockkin ko <kockkinko@gmail.com>

    Am Sa, den 20.11.2004 schrieb kockkin ko um 7:46:

    > I found the xorg-x11-devel package in my FC3 installation. (Please see
    > below at the bottom of this email for the detail of rpm -qi
    > xorg-x11-devel. )
    > Looking at the issue more closely, I found the error statement
    > emphasing incompatable libXext.so in configure.log for configureing
    > mplayer. Looking in /usr/X11R6/lib, the libXext.so was there. (Please
    > see below at the bottom of this email for the details of these files)
    >
    > Here comes my questions:
    > My first question is why not compatible?
    > I could not find any package titled xorg-x11-Xext... in the update
    > archive: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/3/x86_64/

    The .so files, only needed at compile time, are (nearly) always in the
    -devel package. Did you install both the i386 and the x88_64 (32bit and
    64bit) RPMs?

    > My next question where to find this package that generate libXext?

    Answered: the devel RPMs hold these files.

    > Looking at both the reply of rpm -qi on the xorg-x11 and
    > xorg-x11-devel, I found the installated rpm packages was not of amd64
    > versions. At least the version number in the reply of rpm -qi did not
    > show amd64. (please see below the rpm -qi reply)

    That may be the problem.

    > My third question is that I am having an amd64 box, does it mean I
    > need to reload all relevant xorg amd64 packages? should they be
    > xorg-x11-devel-6.8.1-12.FC3.1.x86_64.rpm? and
    > xorg-x11-6.8.1-12.FC3.1.x86_64.rpm?

    These x86_64 package should have been installed during installation of
    64bit FC3.

    > My fourth question is that why did FC3 installation disks of amd64 not
    > install the correct version of X11 in my amd64 box?

    Can't say, I don't run a 64bit system. Btw. there is an own mailing list
    for this platform.

    > kockkin ko

    Alexander

    --
    Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
    legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
    Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp 
    Serendipity 17:48:03 up 12:35, 16 users, 0.68, 0.26, 0.14
    
    
    

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    


  • Next message: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Problems with httpd after upgrating to FC3"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Impressions of Gentoo
      ... I'm thinking of giving Gentoo a try. ... for was 1) the kitchen-sink installation and 2) being rpm-based and the ... packages to have it install I ended up with a lot more stuff than I ... No rpm!! ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • [SLE] YaST Online Update Problem
      ... I just migrated from SuSE Linux 8.1 Professional to 8.2 Professional (I'm ... returned a list of patches to 30 or 40 of my packages. ... That part apparently worked fine, but when it went to the installation step, ... I'm not familiar with the inner workings of RPM, ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [opensuse] zypper, how to avoid rpm --force
      ... This means that it does not abort if 2 packages have conflicting ... In gerneral rpm doesn *not* respect the given order, ... I understand that it can't resolve these conflicts before downloading ... but I'd rather would like to see zypper aborting the installation after ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: [opensuse] Too much removed. Any help ?.
      ... using rpm commands (put in one line the rpm command with all the ... cd to the directory in the dvd holding the yast packages, ... yast2-installation>= 2.15.12 is needed by ... combination of the repair system and the installation system after ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: yum vs. rpm to install occasional products
      ... coworker told me that I should use rpmbecause the installation ... Yellowdog Linux for the PowerPC) is an intelligent front end for rpm ... Dependency resolution is yum's. ... rpm can be used to remove packages without bitching about dependencies. ...
      (Fedora)