Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)
From: John Summerfield (debian_at_herakles.homelinux.org)
Date: 11/24/04
- Previous message: Richard E Miles: "Re: Continuing saga of dupilcate mails using fetchmail-6.2.5-6 in FC3"
- In reply to: Steffen Kluge: "yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Next in thread: William Hooper: "Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Reply: William Hooper: "Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Reply: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:35:26 +0800
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 08:29, Steffen Kluge wrote:
> I always thought of apt as an alternative (to RPM) way of packaging and
> delivering software. I have never used it myself but I understand there
> is some apt-rpm middleware nowadays. I suppose Fedora apt repos use
> RPMs? Anything else would be a mess.
Debian's dpkg is equivalent to rpm; it installs packages, builds packages and
so on.
apt-get is a wrapper for dpkg; it resolves dependancies, ensures you get the
latest versions and generally makes life easier. It's about equivalent to
up2date. Unlike up2date, it's not tied to any proprietary support system.
-- Cheers John -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Richard E Miles: "Re: Continuing saga of dupilcate mails using fetchmail-6.2.5-6 in FC3"
- In reply to: Steffen Kluge: "yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Next in thread: William Hooper: "Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Reply: William Hooper: "Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Reply: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: yum gripes (Was: Re: yum vs. apt)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|