Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 9, Issue 408

From: Hans Ottens (hottens_at_rogers.com)
Date: 11/25/04

  • Next message: Scot L. Harris: "Re: Serial terminal emulator"
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:56:47 -0500
    
    

    Yes, learning to work with the udev is the answer. The PC-PalmIIIex link
    works after every PC reboot (just for experimenting). Thanks.

    Hans Ottens

    On Wed, 2004-24-11 at 19:33 -0500, fedora-list-request@redhat.com wrote:
    > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    >
    > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    > fedora-list-request@redhat.com
    >
    > You can reach the person managing the list at
    > fedora-list-owner@redhat.com
    >
    > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
    >
    >
    > Today's Topics:
    >
    > 1. Re: Where are we going in the Fedora development?
    > (John Summerfield)
    > 2. Re: FC2 and RPM (Rahul Sundaram)
    > 3. Re: sshd: it is permit to login with a Empty Password
    > (William Hooper)
    > 4. Re: FC3, minimun install and XForwarding (Fernando Gozalo)
    > 5. Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where
    > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works (John Summerfield)
    > 6. Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes (John Summerfield)
    > 7. Re: How to block a range of IP's with
    > system-config-securitylevel-tui? (John Summerfield)
    > 8. Re: Serial terminal emulator (fredex)
    > 9. Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes (Colin O'Flynn)
    > 10. Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where
    > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works (William Hooper)
    > 11. Anybody got FC3 installed on software raid-1 with Grub
    > (Yusuf Goolamabbas)
    > 12. Re: Can't get shockwave viewer to install in FC3 (Kim Lux)
    > 13. Re: BOOBY TRAPS? (Rodolfo J. Paiz)
    > 14. Re: Palm Pilot and FC3 - Again! (Thomas Zehetbauer)
    > 15. Re: Server Tools Don't Prompt for Root Password (Randy Chrismon)
    > 16. Re: BOOBY TRAPS? (Arthur Stephens)
    > 17. Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where
    > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works (Rahul Sundaram)
    > 18. Re: BOOBY TRAPS? (Rahul Sundaram)
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 1
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:14:54 +0800
    > From: John Summerfield <debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Subject: Re: Where are we going in the Fedora development?
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <200411250714.55050.debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    >
    > On Thursday 25 November 2004 00:07, akonstam@trinity.edu wrote:
    > > Once again I want to share something but don't want to start a rant.
    > >
    > > I finally got FC3 installed and have serious questions as to where
    > > this Fedora Development is going. Are changes being made for good
    > > reason or just to be different? Is there good reason to have two
    > > panels on the screen (at top and bottom) instead of one, two
    >
    > That's Gnome 2.8. Compare with Ubuntu, a Debian-based distro. It's a single-CD
    > install (but essentiall all of Debian downloadable after installation).
    >
    > It also does some things better than FC does.
    >
    > > essentially equivalent menus under different icons, logout hidden in a
    > > different place, etc.
    > > My reaction to having changes made in resolv.conf disappear after a
    > > reboot was not a positive one. Luckily I had a hint of why this was
    > > happening in a previous posting.
    >
    > dhcp has done that for ever. pppd has too, but that's configurable.
    >
    >
    > >
    > > I could go on with changes like udev and /media in place of /mnt but
    > /media is LSB compliance. Debian does it too. Previously RH and Debian
    > differed.
    >
    > > you get the idea. Are these changes caused by a overwhelming goal that
    > > trumps the confusion they cause.
    > >
    > > In the back of my mind I would like Windows users to switch to Linux seeing
    > > it can be presented in as friendly appearance as Windows is to them.
    >
    > Windows changes too. Get new Windows, likely you'll need new apps. Sometimes,
    > get new Windows SP & need new apps.
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Cheers
    > John
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 2
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 04:44:01 +0530
    > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Re: FC2 and RPM
    > To: dave.woolcock@spamcop.net, For users of Fedora Core releases
    > <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <c79487d6041124151476cb893e@mail.gmail.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    >
    > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:50:01 +0000, dave.woolcock@spamcop.net
    > <dave.woolcock@spamcop.net> wrote:
    > > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:51:47 -0600 (CST), you wrote:
    > >
    > > >Oh you mean - install some RPM built for SUSE 8.0 on FC3?
    > >
    > > er, yes - I thought you could do that.
    > >
    > > Otherwise Linux is worse than Windoze DLL hell
    >
    > not really. its just that they are likely to be incompatible which has
    > nothing to do with shared libraries
    >
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Rahul Sundaram
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 3
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:29:23 -0500 (EST)
    > From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@earthlink.net>
    > Subject: Re: sshd: it is permit to login with a Empty Password
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <1444.192.168.0.254.1101338963.squirrel@whooper.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
    >
    >
    > Dario Lesca said:
    > > On a standard installation of FC1 and FC2 (and FC3?) is permit to login
    > > with a user with a empty password ... is this correct?
    >
    > No, it doesn't.
    >
    > > [root@igloo root]# man sshd_config
    > >
    > >> PermitEmptyPasswords
    > >> When password authentication is allowed, it specifies whether the
    > >> server allows login to accounts with empty password strings. The default
    > >> is no.
    >
    > The default is to not allow empty password strings.
    >
    > > [root@igloo root]# grep PermitEmptyPasswords /etc/ssh/sshd_config
    > > #PermitEmptyPasswords no
    >
    > If, for what ever reason I can't conceive, you would want to allow people
    > to log in via ssh without a password, uncomment this line and change it to
    > "yes". First, though, make sure your machine is sufficiently isolated
    > from any insecure network (like the Internet).
    >
    > --
    > William Hooper
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 4
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 00:32:28 +0100 (CET)
    > From: "Fernando Gozalo" <fgozalo0@alumno.uned.es>
    > Subject: Re: FC3, minimun install and XForwarding
    > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <12959.80.58.4.107.1101339148.squirrel@80.58.4.107>
    > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
    >
    > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Fernando Gozalo wrote:
    > >
    > >> Hi,
    > >>
    > >> I have done a FC3 minimun install in a server. I have tried to ssh to
    > >> the
    > >> server with XForwarding but with no success.
    > >>
    > >> I've tried several things:
    > >> . from a FC2 to this FC3 with "ssh -X server"
    > >> . from a FC3 to this FC3 with "ssh -X server" and "ssh -Y server"
    > >>
    > >> No XForwarding :(
    > >>
    > >> So, I think I need to install other package/packages, but don't know.
    > >>
    > >> Any hint?
    > >
    > > You'll need atleast 'xauth' to have ssh-x11-forwarding working. Try:
    > >
    > > yum install xorg-x11-xauth
    > >
    > > Satish
    > >
    >
    > It works.
    >
    > Gracias.
    > Fernando.
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 5
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:51:26 +0800
    > From: John Summerfield <debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where
    > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <200411250651.26683.debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    >
    > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 23:01, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
    > > This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But
    > > IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry
    > > for seeing them not working ;-)
    >
    > Labels are a good idea implemented poorly. The kernel should whinge loutly
    > when it sees duplicates.
    >
    > My background is in IBM mainframes. Even as far back as OS (aka OS/360)
    > storage volumes (disk ^ such and tape) were labelled. OS complained whenever
    > it saw two volumes with the same "volume serial number."
    >
    > Back then, disk volumes held no more than one filesystem.
    >
    > There was never any confustion about duplicates because they were always
    > announced at the time. During IPL the operator had to choose one; once the
    > system was up the newer one was unmounted.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Cheers
    > John
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 6
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:30:33 +0800
    > From: John Summerfield <debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Subject: Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <200411250630.33726.debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    >
    > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 22:07, P Jones wrote:
    > > In FC2 a problem that sounds like the problem you're having was traced
    > > to Klipper,
    >
    > That sounds entirely consistent with my observations.
    >
    >
    > --
    > Cheers
    > John
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 7
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:28:12 +0800
    > From: John Summerfield <debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Subject: Re: How to block a range of IP's with
    > system-config-securitylevel-tui?
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <200411250628.12971.debian@herakles.homelinux.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    >
    > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 21:51, Vinicius wrote:
    > > I get this URL about shorewall
    > > "http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm". I will read it soon.
    > >
    > > Can it be integrated with FC3's netfilter/iptables?
    >
    > This and many more questions will be ansered as you read that document.
    >
    > >
    > > Could you show us a simple configuration about the "cans" and
    > > "cannots", please?
    >
    > Once you understand the topic it's quite simple but there are several files
    > involved.
    >
    > One normally defines z series of zones, and mostly each zone is on a its own
    > interface.
    >
    > In this particular case, there was only one interface but I wanted different
    > access rules for each of three groups of addresses.
    >
    >
    > It seems in any event I can't send any of the config to the list; the box
    > seems to be down atm.
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Cheers
    > John
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 8
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:41:38 -0500
    > From: fredex <fredex@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
    > Subject: Re: Serial terminal emulator
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20041124234138.GA11651@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    >
    > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:07:56PM +0100, Jakub Roguski wrote:
    > > Hi all,
    > > I very often have to configure devices, which use serial port and null-modem
    > > cable for communication. I'm looking for the most comfortable solution of
    > > VT100 terminal emulator running over serial port on FC3. I tried minicom, but
    > > would like something easier to use. Any idea? Maybe a way to use linux
    > > terminal together with serial port? Or simple VT100 emulator using serial?
    >
    > I seemto recall having found that PUTTY has a linux version. But whether
    > that is true or not, the linux console is more or less a superset of
    > vt100 (as long as you don't want the keys to work like vt100 keys),
    > and the xterm also works reasonably in lieu of vt100.
    >
    > Fred
    >
    > --
    > ---- Fred Smith -- fredex@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -----------------------------
    > The Lord detests the way of the wicked
    > but he loves those who pursue righteousness.
    > ----------------------------- Proverbs 15:9 (niv) -----------------------------
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > Name: not available
    > Type: application/pgp-signature
    > Size: 189 bytes
    > Desc: not available
    > Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041124/39fd595f/attachment.bin
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 9
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:45:12 -0400
    > From: "Colin O'Flynn" <coflynn@newae.com>
    > Subject: Re: FC3 Seems to "Freeze" sometimes
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <200411241945.12449.coflynn@newae.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    >
    > Okay - I want to try disabling the acrobat plugin in Firefox. However I can't
    > seem to do that...
    >
    > I don't know what I've done wrong, I can't find any reference to acrobat or a
    > file with a name pdf in it as I am supposed to in the /usr/lib/firefox-1.0/
    > directory. Nor can I find mention of it in any of the preference files to the
    > best of my knowledge...
    >
    > Anyone got some hints? I don't fully remember how I installed Acrobat - it was
    > with the provided script I think.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > -Colin
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 10
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:45:59 -0500 (EST)
    > From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@earthlink.net>
    > Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where
    > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <1518.192.168.0.254.1101339959.squirrel@whooper.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
    >
    >
    > John Summerfield said:
    > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 23:01, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
    > >
    > >> This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But
    > >> IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry
    > >> for seeing them not working ;-)
    > >
    > > Labels are a good idea implemented poorly. The kernel should whinge
    > > loutly when it sees duplicates.
    >
    > IIUC the kernel knows nothing of labels. They are a purely a userland
    > concept (which is why you must use an initrd if you wish to use them).
    >
    > --
    > William Hooper
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 11
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 07:49:16 +0800
    > From: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@outblaze.com>
    > Subject: Anybody got FC3 installed on software raid-1 with Grub
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <20041124234916.GA11958@outblaze.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >
    > Hi, There seems to be a number of bugs relating to Grub not installing
    > well on software raid-1 config. The symptoms seem to be that after a
    > install, the system just hangs on boot
    >
    > http://tinyurl.com/6t2vz
    >
    > expands to a bugzilla query of 'grub raid'.
    > If someone has successfully installed FC3 on a software raid-1 system
    > (without LVM) then I would appreciate info regarding their hardware
    > config and steps they took (if they were different from standard
    > install)
    >
    > There is a workaround of updating the MBR in rescue mode but that
    > doesn't work in all cases
    >
    > http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=26912
    >
    > Regards, Yusuf
    > --
    > Yusuf Goolamabbas
    > yusufg@outblaze.com
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 12
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:03:00 -0700
    > From: Kim Lux <lux@diesel-research.com>
    > Subject: Re: Can't get shockwave viewer to install in FC3
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <1101340980.3719.12.camel@zd7280.localdomain>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    >
    > Thanks for the link to the flashviewer rpm.
    >
    > It installed fine, ie without errors on my FC3, but doesn't install
    > flash for konqueror. Firefox used flash fine.
    >
    > rpm returns this (plus messages about NOID !)
    >
    > Registering flashplayer as a XPCOM component in
    > /usr/lib/mozilla-1.7.3
    >
    > Registering flashplayer as a XPCOM component in
    > /usr/lib/firefox-1.0
    > Setup is complete.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 15:56 -0700, Kim Lux wrote:
    > > Not only did it not take the install path properly, but it started some
    > > sort of rogue process on my machine ! My laptop fan went nuts and I did
    > > a top and found a macromedia process running ! What is up with that ?
    > >
    > > I very much dislike installing third party closed source software that
    > > comes from the Internet. I killed the macromedia process. A few
    > > minutes later my fan went nuts again. This time top showed the process
    > > "top" running at 98% cpu usage. I rebooted and now the process list
    > > looks OK.
    > >
    > > I need shockwave to view a website. Anyone else had this
    > > experience ?
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 15:43 -0700, Kim Lux wrote:
    > > >
    > > > #./flashplayer-installer
    > > >
    > > > Copyright(C) 2002-2003 Macromedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
    > > >
    > > > Macromedia Flash Player 7 for Linux
    > > >
    > > > Macromedia Flash Player 7 will be installed on this machine.
    > > >
    > > > You are running the Macromedia Flash Player installer as the "root"
    > > > user.
    > > > Macromedia Flash Player 7 will be installed system-wide.
    > > >
    > > > Support is available at http://www.macromedia.com/support/flashplayer/
    > > >
    > > > To install Macromedia Flash Player 7 now, press ENTER.
    > > >
    > > > To cancel the installation at any time, press Control-C.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > NOTE: Macromedia Flash Player requires two font packages
    > > > to be installed, ttfonts and urw-fonts.
    > > >
    > > > Press ENTER to continue...
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > NOTE: Please exit any browsers you may have running.
    > > >
    > > > Press ENTER to continue...
    > > >
    > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape,
    > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): /usr/lib
    > > >
    > > > WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path.
    > > >
    > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape,
    > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): /usr/lib/mozilla
    > > >
    > > > WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path.
    > > >
    > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape,
    > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): /usr/bin
    > > >
    > > > WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path.
    > > >
    > > > Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, Netscape,
    > > > or Opera browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla):
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > # find / -name konqueror
    > > > /usr/bin/konqueror
    > > > /usr/share/apps/konqueror
    > > > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/konqueror
    > > > /home/krlux/.kde/share/apps/konqueror
    > > > /home/sheri/.kde/share/apps/konqueror
    > > > /root/.kde/share/apps/konqueror
    > > >
    > > > # find / -name mozilla
    > > > /usr/lib/mozilla
    > > > /usr/bin/mozilla
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > --
    > Kim Lux (Mr.) Diesel Research Inc
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 13
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:13:56 -0600
    > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@simpaticus.com>
    > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS?
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1101341636.3668.59.camel@rodolfo.gt.factorrent.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:57 -0800, Arthur Stephens wrote:
    > > Doing a server new install yesterday.
    > > Came in this morning and there was this message on the console of my
    > > fedora3 box
    > >
    > > BOOBY TRAPS
    > > INIT: version 2.85 reloading
    > >
    >
    > You may safely disregard the "INIT" line. It comes up now and again but
    > is entirely harmless. The "booby traps" line I have never seen, but it
    > sure as hell does not sound good.
    >
    > Is this box connected to a network or the Internet? Is it firewalled?
    > Did you check the logs? Is it even remotely possible that it has been
    > cracked?
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > --
    > Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@simpaticus.com>
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 14
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 01:15:14 +0100
    > From: Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz@hostmaster.org>
    > Subject: Re: Palm Pilot and FC3 - Again!
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <1101341714.4260.5.camel@hostmaster.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    >
    > Manual symlinks in /dev do not work with udev, add the following line
    > to /etc/udev/rules.d/10-local.rules:
    > KERNEL="ttyUSB1",SYMLINK="pilot"
    >
    > Permissions on /dev/pilot are given to every user logging on locally,
    > this is specified in /etc/security/console.perms and processed upon
    > login and when udev creates entries device entries.
    >
    > Tom
    >
    > --
    > T h o m a s Z e h e t b a u e r ( TZ251 )
    > PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
    > finger thomasz@hostmaster.org for key
    >
    > Attempting to apply the OSI layers model to a real network is just like
    > attempting to represent seven dimensions in four dimensional reality.
    >
    >
    >
    > -------------- next part --------------
    > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > Name: not available
    > Type: application/pgp-signature
    > Size: 481 bytes
    > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
    > Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041125/4f1233ac/attachment.bin
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 15
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:20:06 -0500
    > From: Randy Chrismon <rchrismon@patmedia.net>
    > Subject: Re: Server Tools Don't Prompt for Root Password
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <41A52536.4090000@patmedia.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    >
    > Matthew Miller wrote:
    >
    > >On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 08:54:45PM -0500, Randy Chrismon wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >> <snip>
    > >
    > >
    > >>From the 'rpm' man page -- the "M" means the 'mode' (a.k.a. file
    > >permissions) have changed. And, as the first error message above indicates,
    > >this binary needs to be setuid root -- that is, owned by root and have the
    > >setuid file permission.
    > >
    > >
    > >Have you run any scripts to "secure" your system? An overzealous [1]
    > >security sweep could very easily choose to remove that bit....
    > >
    > >
    > >(The "G" is also a little bit disturbing -- it means the group ownership has
    > >changed, and on my system, it's in group "root". Odd for that to change.)
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > Mea culpa! Mea maxima culpa!
    > Two lessons: 1. I don't know what I'm doing, generally, and particularly
    > with file permissions and user rights. 2. Don't do things when you don't
    > know what you're doing.
    > A few days before I noticed the problem, I did a chown on one of the
    > /usr subdirectories (I don't even remember which one, now) so I could
    > execute an executable of some sort. That's probably where things got
    > messed up. Don't ask me what I was thinking because I probably wasn't.
    >
    > Anyway, I've changed the user:group back to root:root. Now, I don't even
    > get the insufficient privileges message box. Whatever system setting app
    > now just refuses to start. OTOH, now I know what I did wrong, where I
    > did it, and what man pages to look at. Thanks for all the help; I
    > wouldn't have made it this far, otherwise.
    > Randy
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 16
    > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:30:30 -0800
    > From: "Arthur Stephens" <astephens@ptera.net>
    > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS?
    > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <0e2c01c4d285$f7eacca0$c600a8c0@tyliteworker>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    >
    > Brand new install on 11/22/04. Connected on our local 192.168.0.x network
    > on 11/23/04
    > It was firewalled before being connected.
    > Could not find anything unusual in the logs.
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@simpaticus.com>
    > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:13 PM
    > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS?
    >
    >
    > > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:57 -0800, Arthur Stephens wrote:
    > > > Doing a server new install yesterday.
    > > > Came in this morning and there was this message on the console of my
    > > > fedora3 box
    > > >
    > > > BOOBY TRAPS
    > > > INIT: version 2.85 reloading
    > > >
    > >
    > > You may safely disregard the "INIT" line. It comes up now and again but
    > > is entirely harmless. The "booby traps" line I have never seen, but it
    > > sure as hell does not sound good.
    > >
    > > Is this box connected to a network or the Internet? Is it firewalled?
    > > Did you check the logs? Is it even remotely possible that it has been
    > > cracked?
    > >
    > > Cheers,
    > >
    > > --
    > > Rodolfo J. Paiz <rpaiz@simpaticus.com>
    > >
    > > --
    > > fedora-list mailing list
    > > fedora-list@redhat.com
    > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 17
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:01:05 +0530
    > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Re: kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2 boot failure where
    > kernel-2.6.9-1.3_FC2 works
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <c79487d604112416312724e441@mail.gmail.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    >
    > On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:51:26 +0800, John Summerfield
    > <debian@herakles.homelinux.org> wrote:
    > > On Wednesday 24 November 2004 23:01, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
    > > > This doesn't solve the original problems of labels not working. But
    > > > IMHO, labels were bad idea to begin with, so I can't say I feel sorry
    > > > for seeing them not working ;-)
    > >
    > > Labels are a good idea implemented poorly. The kernel should whinge loutly
    > > when it sees duplicates.
    >
    > officially devlabel is depreciated in favor of udev. so i guess your
    > problem should go away soon
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Rahul Sundaram
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 18
    > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 06:02:37 +0530
    > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Re: BOOBY TRAPS?
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <c79487d60411241632714f97bb@mail.gmail.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    >
    > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:57:30 -0800, Arthur Stephens <astephens@ptera.net> wrote:
    > >
    > > Doing a server new install yesterday.
    > > Came in this morning and there was this message on the console of my
    > > fedora3 box
    > >
    > > BOOBY TRAPS
    > > INIT: version 2.85 reloading
    > >
    >
    >
    > suggestion: download the kernel source code and grep it. If this line
    > is not in the kernel your machine is probably cracked
    >
    > download chkroot and rkhunter and make sure its not trojaned
    >
    >

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Scot L. Harris: "Re: Serial terminal emulator"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: install woes
      ... looking at the Fedora 9 64bit DVD: ... I'd try the acpi=off, but I didn't need any boot options, as far as I remember ... appended the kernel, probably post-install. ... but on attempting to install, it freezes up at the test media screen. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: install woes, SUCCESS!
      ... vmlinuz initrd=initrd.img noapic nolapic ... appended the kernel, probably post-install. ... but on attempting to install, it freezes up at the test media screen. ... Fedora 8 installed ok, but I had problems booting post install, and had to ...
      (Fedora)
    • problems with fglrx xorg700 on fedora5
      ... running a linux box on fedora5 with a 2.6 kernel. ... fedora version, i had to do everything again. ... got easy, i had a couple of patches, and managed to install it quite ... X Error of failed request: ...
      (alt.linux)
    • 2.6.15 doesnt see ide disks -- very bad [WAS: system hosed by udev in dist-upgrade]
      ... > g3), and when udev wouldn't install, I apt-getted a newer kernel to ... > udev can't be installed... ... I tried booting with my old kernel & found that the system ... that I can finish my system-destroying dist-upgrade. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Not enough info, so no point
      ... newer kernel, for Live CD, install DVD, and actual installation, and all ... Perhaps after Fedora 15 has ... the next kernel update another install will work. ... I remember from one of your previous posts that you have a SCSI ...
      (Fedora)