Re: OT: fighting rbl's

From: Thomas Zehetbauer (thomasz_at_hostmaster.org)
Date: 11/30/04

  • Next message: Aleksandar Milivojevic: "Re: OT: fighting rbl's"
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:45:15 +0100
    
    
    
    

    On Die, 2004-11-30 at 14:48 +0000, Chris Hewitt wrote:
    > The IP addresses are in DBL. That way, the ISP does not mind me running
    > smtp (rather than pop/imap), as if I mis-configured with open-relay or
    > sent spam, other email servers would not respond to me and if I use my
    > ISP's email server to send spam they would notice it in their logs
    > quickly.

    My ISP here has 228,000 customers. If every one of them sends only 10
    messages per day this makes 2,280,000 messages. This gives me good
    reason to doubt they would notice a few spammers abusing their mail
    servers.

    > I do not see any problem in everyone using their ISP's mail server for
    > outgoing email. It is easy to configure and provides some anti-spam
    > measures for the ISP and for any unfortunate end-user mis-configuring a
    > smtp server for open-relay.

    My ISP's mail server _cluster_ has a history of loosing messages and
    being blacklisted for sending spam. Especially caused by clueless end
    users configuring their open relay to use the ISP's mail server as
    smarthost.

    > Thomas, why would you not want to use your ISP's outgoing mail server?

    Using my own mail server I can verify that and when a message has been
    delivered to the recipients server. Have you ever tried to get this
    information from your ISP?

    Last but not least we live in a time of more surveillance than ever
    before. Using the ISP's mail server gives the authorities a central
    point for scanning the messages in transit. Yes, I use PGP but this
    requires a certain skill and privacy awareness from the recipient. TLS
    on the other hand is more widely deployed and provides an easy solution
    to ensure that mail can only be read at the sender's and recipient's
    sites.

    Tom

    -- 
      T h o m a s   Z e h e t b a u e r   ( TZ251 )
      PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
          finger thomasz@hostmaster.org for key
    
    

    
    

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    


  • Next message: Aleksandar Milivojevic: "Re: OT: fighting rbl's"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Exchange Server name & MX records
      ... record pointing to a new ISP, however the Exchange mail server did not ... Since you have changed MX record to point to another ISP, ... CEICW (Configuration E-mail and Internet Connection wizard -> Connect to ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Outlook wont send large attachments
      ... the one operating your own personal mail server. ... header to the e-mail client while they interrogate the message but that only ... the timeout due to excessive delay. ...
      (microsoft.public.outlook)
    • Re: more on the outgoing smtps (port 465) ...
      ... it got to do with the server having AUTH_OPTIONS=p? ... SMTPS but not STARTTLS, are there? ... already having dialup access _and_ existing mailboxes at another ISP ... another ISP's mail server just to send mail, ...
      (comp.mail.sendmail)
    • Re: Opto-couplers in smps - part 3 (final chapter)
      ... | My current ISP doesn't. ... Dumb donkey, you just said they didn't support user web pages. ... Since when is a mail server anything to do with use webspace? ...
      (sci.electronics.design)
    • RE: No delivery report 4.4.7
      ... mail.rabarberlandet.dk is a mail server host on our ISP. ... Please let me know where the mail.rabarberlandet.dk host on. ... Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)