Re: Enterprise mail server
From: Alexander Dalloz (ad+lists_at_uni-x.org)
Date: 12/05/04
- Previous message: Joel Jaeggli: "Re: Recommend wireless card"
- In reply to: Chris Mason: "Enterprise mail server"
- Next in thread: Chris Mason: "RE: Enterprise mail server"
- Reply: Chris Mason: "RE: Enterprise mail server"
- Reply: Ow Mun Heng: "Re: Enterprise mail server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:56:59 +0100
Am So, den 05.12.2004 schrieb Chris Mason um 15:13:
> I'm looking for feedback on experiences of implementing an enterprise mail
> server with IMAP and webmail, preferably groupware, on our Dual Xeon Fedora
> server. We currently have sendmail, uw-imap, squirrelmail, in standard
> Redhat configuration, and we are having huge load problems as the present
> setup is not capable of supporting the needs of our users. Large mail
> folders bring the server to it's knees. We only have 25 users but they
> travel and use the mail system as a filing system, routinely saving 10MB
> emails and never cleaning up old mail.
uw-imapd is known to be dog slow when it comes to large mboxes. There
are too many reports about it causing much CPU occupation when
processing (high loads then). I encourage you to migrate to a
Cyrus-IMAPd (coming with FC2 and FC3) - runs impressively fast even on
my very old and weak AMD K6-3 450 MHz, handling 1,5 GB mail -, keeping
Sendmail. I can not say how well SquirrelMail as a webmailer is
performing. What I highly recommend is to use an IMAP proxy between the
Cyrus-IMAPd and SquirrelMail. That can improve webmail speed a lot. As
SquirrelMail is PHP written I recommend using the Turck MMCache which
improves the speed of PHP applications a lot. Maybe try as an alternate
to SquirrelMail the Horde framework (www.horde.org). It runs very well
for me and there are very large mail environments were it proofed it's
power.
> We also need more groupware type features such as file sharing, messaging
> and calendaring. I am looking at Binari, Groupwise, Surgemail, and
> opengroupware which would involve more work to implement for me.
OpenGroupware is IMHO the only free application in your list. If costs
play a role and you are able to implement and customize it to your need,
then it is certainly the tool of choice.
> Chris Mason
Alexander
-- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp Serendipity 17:56:54 up 1 day, 7:15, load average: 0.17, 0.20, 0.19
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- Previous message: Joel Jaeggli: "Re: Recommend wireless card"
- In reply to: Chris Mason: "Enterprise mail server"
- Next in thread: Chris Mason: "RE: Enterprise mail server"
- Reply: Chris Mason: "RE: Enterprise mail server"
- Reply: Ow Mun Heng: "Re: Enterprise mail server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|