Re: FC2 -> FC3 upgrade question

From: Andrew Hutchings (mail_at_a-wing.co.uk)
Date: 12/05/04

  • Next message: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: NLD 9"
    To: Wong Kwok-hon <kwokhon@gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 18:09:19 +0000
    
    

    If you want a continually up to date fedora try using rawhide. Up2date
    will keep it current.

    I feel there have been several significant internal changes to Fedora to
    warranty the Core 3 release.

    I also wouldn't say the core is rushed out, it doesn't always have the
    latest packages, only the ones deemed stable at testing/release cycle.

    Regards
    Andrew

    On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 01:49 +0800, Wong Kwok-hon wrote:
    > On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:38:17 -0500, Michael J. Pawlowsky
    > <mikep@mi-consultants.com> wrote:
    > > Jay Moore wrote:
    > >
    > > > In my opinion, the ideal would be an OS upgrade every 3-4 years, and/or
    > > >
    > > >some better (more complete?) tools for automating the upgrade process.
    > > >I'm sure this is a pretty difficult thing to do, but I'm into wishful
    > > >thinking today :)
    > > >
    > > >
    > > I have to agree with you there. I''m not really sure what consist of a
    > > major upgrade for FC.
    > > Why not simply call it FC (no numeral) and keep upgrading the packages
    > > an that's it.
    > >
    > > It almost seems like a race simply to get out another major version...
    > > when there seems to be so many little bug fixes improvements that can be
    > > made and still call it FC3 or whatever.
    > >
    > > This seems like a "Commercial Software" cycle thing. Where we need to
    > > get out a version before the 1st quarter of 05 to bring in some revenues
    > > from upgrades. ;-)
    >
    > Yes, I feel we are the tester of a software sometimes.
    > But RedHat is become a commerical software like others.
    > So no choice to continue to use it....
    >
    > Ringo
    >

    -- 
    Andrew Hutchings
    Systems Operator / Developer / Linux Guru
    Netserve Consultants Ltd.
    http://www.domaincity.co.uk/
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: NLD 9"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: WTF: Stack Size 4k
      ... > hell are those of us who use and love the SCSI boards based on the ... > kernel with the 8k stack size by choosing to not allow that as an option ... I, for one, see great folly in upgrading ANY datacenter to Fedora Core 2 ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: new to Fedora Core 4
      ... > Utilities 2002 be compatible with Fedora Core 4? ... > Windows XP, can I copy and paste it from my cd to this operating system? ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: email servers
      ... Fedora ships Sendmail and Postfix (Core) and Exim ... virtual hosting (multiple domain handling). ...
      (Fedora)
    • HELP: Fedora 5 causes kernel to always freeze!
      ... I have an AMD-64 system which I have 32-bit fedora installed. ... When core 5 was released, I upgraded again to the 32-bit version. ... Since day one, I experienced random freezes. ... is it a bug that should be reported somewhere? ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: FC2 Issues
      ... Redhat is the stable version. ... Fedora as release candidates and not true released product? ... Core 2 hosed ...
      (Fedora)