Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]
From: Richard Crawford (rscrawford_at_mossroot.com)
Date: 12/21/04
- Previous message: Doncho N. Gunchev: "Re: General request .. Dismal performance of core 3 .."
- In reply to: James Wilkinson: "Re: Not to whine, but..."
- Next in thread: James McKenzie: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: James McKenzie: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: Matthew Miller: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: Bill Gradwohl: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: Bill Gradwohl: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:41:36 -0800
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 17:16, James Wilkinson wrote:
> This message?
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-December/msg05433.html
>
> You got a response in
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-December/msg05515.html
> which implicitly asked a supplementary question: what sort of network
> card?
>
> Incidentally, it looks as though your followup message was sent less
> than twenty-four hours after the first one. In my experience, you need
> to wait four or five days at least for everyone to have a chance to
> catch up on the mailing list and try to answer your questions.
My apologies. Chalk it up to a really bad day at work. :-P I missed
William's response to my e-mail.
Bill: I, too, have never encountered a problem like this in the dozen
or so RH, Debian, or SuSE installations I've done. The same problem did
show up when I installed the SMP version of the 2.6 kernel with a SuSE
9.2 installation, which makes me think that the problem might be with
the 2.6 kernel and not with Fedora Core.
William and Jim: It is indeed a 3com card. More specifically,
3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 74). The bug file that William pointed to
looks familiar, but I have never encountered this problem before under
any other kernel; I even had the SMP version of a 2.4 kernel running
before without difficulties.
The computer can see the network through the card, and I can ping other
computers in my network and on the Internet, but there is significant
packet loss -- between 36% and 94%.
The computer is a dual-processor PIII with 512MB RAM. It's not a laptop
computer. I'm running FC2, with the 2.6.9-1.6_FC2 kernel. The problem
occurs when I try to run the SMP version of the same kernel.
William's response gave me pause for thought. I do have a spare Belkin
NIC card lying around; I'll swap the 3Com out for that and see if that
works.
Again: Thanks to all who responded, and my apologies to the same as
well.
-- Richard S. Crawford / http://www.mossroot.com AIM: Buffalo2K / ICQ: 11646404 / Y!: rscrawford ""We live as though the world were how it should be, to show it what it can be." --"Angel", Season 4 ep. 1 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Doncho N. Gunchev: "Re: General request .. Dismal performance of core 3 .."
- In reply to: James Wilkinson: "Re: Not to whine, but..."
- Next in thread: James McKenzie: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: James McKenzie: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: Matthew Miller: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: Bill Gradwohl: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Reply: Bill Gradwohl: "Re: Not to whine, but [more details on NIC problem]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|