Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\\\'t show all rpms in a repository
From: William Hooper (whooperhsd3_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 01/21/05
- Previous message: Bill Nottingham: "Re: Why do I need isdn4k-utils"
- In reply to: Dennis Shaw: "Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\\\'t show all rpms in a repository"
- Next in thread: William Hooper: "Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:43:01 -0500 (EST) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Dennis Shaw said:
> No, it's not recognizing them as updates because the filenames aren't
> following the same naming convention.
Incorrect.
> In the simpler example, if the newer
> file was named gpdf.i386-2.8.2-2.2.rpm, it would recognize it. Notice the
> placement of the i386.
yum list doesn't display the filename. It displays:
rpm_name.arch version
The filename is in the format
rpm_name-version.arch.rpm
They aren't ever directly compaired.
-- William Hooper -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Bill Nottingham: "Re: Why do I need isdn4k-utils"
- In reply to: Dennis Shaw: "Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\\\'t show all rpms in a repository"
- Next in thread: William Hooper: "Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|