Re: NVIDIA driver *taints* kernel???

• Previous message: David Cary Hart: "Re: what are you using to write webpages?"
• In reply to: Gain Paolo Mureddu: "Re: NVIDIA driver *taints* kernel???"
• Next in thread: Guy Fraser: "Re: NVIDIA driver *taints* kernel???"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:05:47 -0700

On Fri, 2005-21-01 at 03:37 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
> This issue (IMO) is a very delicate one (despite the taint)... simply
> because to some people it will give them the creeps to think of having a
> single piece of proprietary software in their systems... I'm not against
> proprietary (if by that we understand comercial too) software on my
> system, as long as it gets the job done. Sure I'd rather use free
> software (free as in freedom) than proprietary. Still the Open Source
> model is generating a shift in people's perception of how software could
> be developed, delivered, deployed and more importantly used. In this
> regard in particular, besides being one of the areas where Linux needs
> more support, mainly from the manufacturers and possibly vendors to
> broaden hardware support, consumer hardware at that, and whether we like
> it or not, 3D graphics cards fall into this category (from low2mid
> range) because often lower-end graphics solutions from the leading
> companies rely on virtually the same hardware as their top notch
> top-of-the line products counterparts (G6600/X600). The way I see it,
> companies have two options: a) Either they provide the drivers
> themselves (which has been the case for 3D graphics cards from nVidia
> and ATi, heck even Matrox) or b) they provide as much information as
> they can (without violating any treatees they could have with third
> party technology providers... S3TC, anyone?) so the community could
> write pure Open Sourced drivers which will obviously lack both: features
> and performance. These two later "side-effects" may not be a problem for
> those users to whom proprietary, closed-sourced software gives them
> goosebumps, but may lure away from Linux users who are willing to
> consider the system as their primary OS. I could not say for sure, but I
> estimate that a great deal (most?) of the home desktop owners also at
> some point do some gaming (which would justify at least support for the
> low2medium range products), where as on corporate desktops that would
> not be of any relevance, and full 2D power may still be required.
>
> Sadly, in the way our society has been modeled, mass success and
> pedantic purity are mutually exclusive (refering to pure OSS and mass
> addoption)... For some even the price appeal of OSS is not enough to
> make the switch, if they're not assured that they will still be able to
> use their computer as they are used to... It is difficult to keep
> everyone happy... and in that regard Linux and the broad range of
> distributions is a belssing.
>
> My 2¢
Well put.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

• Previous message: David Cary Hart: "Re: what are you using to write webpages?"
• In reply to: Gain Paolo Mureddu: "Re: NVIDIA driver *taints* kernel???"
• Next in thread: Guy Fraser: "Re: NVIDIA driver *taints* kernel???"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]