Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)
From: William Hooper (whooperhsd3_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 01/25/05
- Previous message: William Hooper: "Re: Installing via Network without a CD (was Re: Disk Druid - Fedora flame #1)"
- In reply to: Kam Leo: "Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)"
- Next in thread: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)"
- Reply: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:45:36 -0500 (EST) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Kam Leo said:
[snip]
>> No, probably your apt's sources.list is broken/incomplete or one of the
>> apt repositories you are using is broken.
[snip]
> Try the beta version of smart (Smart Package Manager,
> http://smartpm.org). It's claim to fame is that it is
> supposed to handle these difficult dependency issues. It's a little slow
> on my system, but it works.
So what would SmartPM's reaction to pointing a FC3 machine at FC2 repos
be? From everything I'm hearing it would be to downgrade most of the
packages to FC2 to satisfy these broken deps. I haven't tried that
personally to verify, but that doesn't sound like something I want a
package manager doing.
-- William Hooper -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: William Hooper: "Re: Installing via Network without a CD (was Re: Disk Druid - Fedora flame #1)"
- In reply to: Kam Leo: "Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)"
- Next in thread: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)"
- Reply: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: Is YUM superior to Synaptic ?? (was synaptic evolution)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
