Re: Regarding MP3 support

From: Aleksandar Milivojevic (amilivojevic_at_pbl.ca)
Date: 01/28/05

  • Next message: James Wilkinson: "Re: Why I think FC3 sucks!" 
    Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:12:08 -0600
To: Temlakos <temlakos@gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    Temlakos wrote:
    >
    > If I might be so bold: the problem might be that he is /acquiring/ MP3
    > files from servers that won't release them as Ogg/Vorbis. It's all
    > very well for us to decide to rip our audio CD's to Ogg/Vorbis instead
    > of MP3. But that doesn't help the user who acquires MP3's that are
    > distributed by certain multimedia Webmasters who, AFAIK, are the
    > original owners or have themselves acquired full distribution rights.
    > An example would be the excellent recording of the Soviet Army Chorus
    > singing the Hymn to the Soviet Union, available on the Web site
    > dedicated to that song's history.

    Or he bought them from one of the online stores. $1 per song.

    > That said, I solved the problem by downloading the RealOne Player for
    > Linux. It will play MP3's without a problem, and Real Media charges
    > nothing. Evidently they have a long-standing MP3 license, and their
    > business model allows them to distribute, free-of-charge, a player
    > that supports MP3, even on an open-source platform like Linux.

    More likely they simply paid flat fee of $50,000 - $60,000 for unlimited
    decoder license for the base (free) version of Real player, and are
    paying $2.50 - $5.00 for each copy of pro (or gold, or whatever they
    call it now) version they sell. While commercial company can probably
    afford spending $50-60k for license for something they are giving for
    free, most open source developers can't. Wich puts them in inferior
    position. Something legislators hasn't envisioned would happen. If
    they was, they probably wouldn't allow for software patents, or there
    would be some limitations on their applicability (believe it or not,
    patent law is about giving inscentive for research and development of
    any kind, so that society as hole can benefit from it, not about
    companies making big money). That's where the big fuss in Europe is
    about right know. While Americans had allowed software patents before
    it was clear that it was mistake, Europeans are now in position to see
    that not having software patents actually returns greater value to the
    society at the end (well, except for pattent office, that probably only
    thinks about all the money they can make on patent applications which
    are rather expensive over there). 

    -- 
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>    Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator                           1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276                     Winnipeg, MB  R3T 1L7
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: James Wilkinson: "Re: Why I think FC3 sucks!"

    Relevant Pages

    • [FSFE PR][EN] Software patents putting International Financial Report Standards (IFRS) in danger (fw
      ... introduction of software patents in Europe to such an extent and in such ... ways that they raise justified doubts in the democratic roots of Europe. ... software patents help protect innovation, ... About the Free Software Foundation Europe: ...
      (comp.os.linux.announce)
    • Symbolic Math / Software Patents in Europe
      ... Algorithms are just math, ultimately, but in Europe ... they're about to legalize software patents. ... Call European Governments to Withdraw Support for the EU Council's ... document and postcards to European legislators. ...
      (sci.math.symbolic)
    • [FSFE PR][EN] A compulsory insurance against software patents is like firefighting with petrol! (fwd
      ... introduction of software patents in Europe. ... The reality that software patents are becoming an innovation restriction ... European Commission is compulsory insurance to limit the damage. ...
      (comp.os.linux.announce)
    • Re: Virus on Windows IE updating web site
      ... because if any one company controlled the Windows APIs ... > gotten off too lightly here, IMO; by allowing MS to license the APIs ... > licensing those out to open-source developers. ... software patents are bad with the browser plugin patents of Eolas, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: gnome.org hacked/cracked ?
      ... > software patents in the EU. ... freedom, innovation, and progress. ... THEN I started learning about what's going on in Europe -- the EU Copyright ... instead of technology to artificially push encryption and digital rights ...
      (comp.os.linux)