Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 11, Issue 467

From: Angelo Machils (angelus_at_sangreal.demon.nl)
Date: 01/31/05

  • Next message: Mark Sargent: "Updating Firefox 0.8 to 1.0"
    Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:40:31 +0100
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    
    

    Jonathan schreef:

    >Angelo Machils wrote:
    >>
    >
    >
    >>> > Hello!
    >>> >
    >>> > I'm running FC3 x86-64 on a AMD 64 3000+ system, but I can't seem to
    >>> > manage to install browser plugins under either Firefox (version 1.0)
    >>> > or Mozilla. I do the manual install after the automatic fails. The
    >>> > install goes okay, but after it I still don't have the plugin.
    >>> > I'm trying the trail version of CrossOffice (for Quicktime) and
    >>> > allthough the program standalong works, the plugin doesn't. I have the
    >>> > plugin in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and copied them also to
    >>> > /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins.
    >>> > I have done the /usr/sbin/prelink -ua tip I found on the internet for
    >>> > FC3, but nothing seems to work.
    >>> >
    >>> > What am I missing here. Installing plugins wasn't so difficult on my
    >>> > FC2 (i386) system.
    >>> >
    >>> > Thanks in advance, Angelo
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Firefox for Linux x86_64 has a quirk. You can't install the 32-bit
    >> versions of some plugins, most notably flash player, maybe others,
    >> because flsh player is still for 32-bit Linux, I don't exaclty know why
    >> it will not work on an x86_64 system, I think it is becuase of some of
    >> the libraries requried by it that may not have all the required
    >> components the plugin needs (maybe it is due to the intrinsic
    >> differences in sizes of integers and the like).
    >
    >
    >
    >This is not a quirk, but the fundamental way things work. You can run
    >32-bit apps on an AMD64 processor with an x86_64 OS, but you cannot
    >mix 32- and 64-bit in the same program. So 64-bit Firefox cannot use
    >32-bit plugins. That is why 32-bit programs need the 32-bit libraries
    >installed. The processor has two distinct modes for 64- or 32-bit and
    >code for plugins is too close to the code for the program for the two
    >to be different architectures.
    >So, in response to Angelo, if you want to use plugins for which there
    >are only 32-bit versions right now (like flash and java), uninstall
    >64-bit Firefox and get the 32-bit version and your plugins will work
    >just fine (go to your local mirror and pick up the RPM). Also, make
    >sure you *soft link* to the plugin. Don't copy it to
    >/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ or it still will not work (by the way,
    >Firefox has its own directory seperate from Mozilla). If you want,
    >you can run 32-bit Mozilla and 64-bit Firefox, or vise-versa if you
    >want both a 32- and 64-bit browser. I don't think you can have both
    >versions of one installed, though. At least yum didn't like that
    >idea. 32-bit Firefox runs great for me though, so I think I'll just
    >stick with it until 64-bit plugins have come around.
    >
    >Jonathan
    >
    Thank you for the reply. There is Firefox 0.9 and Mozilla 1.7.3 (both
    64-bits) installed already. How can I remove for example Mozilla (when I
    do a rpm -qa mozilla I get a whole load full of RPM's) and/or replace it
    with a 32-bits version?

    What directory does Firefox use for its plugins??

    Thanks in advance, Angelo

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Mark Sargent: "Updating Firefox 0.8 to 1.0"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Rip Calvin The Dog 1995-2005. was Re: New Waveland Blog Post
      ... i tried safari instead of firefox 1.0.7 and it worked...maybe i'll try firefox 1.5 beta ... Ah more amo for me to keep with Mozilla nd not FireFox. ... Alot of the functionality is in the plugins which is the way it spozed to be. ... I don't have to save the stylesheet or the webpage, I just edit it live so to speak. ...
      (alt.gathering.rainbow)
    • Re: Trying to make sense of firefox plugins
      ... I have been having a problem with firefox. ... Is there any simple way of seeing what plugins are in use? ... [olivares@localhost .mozilla]$ cd firefox/ ... Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: [SLE] Compare Mozilla and Firefox
      ... Bahram Alinezhad wrote: ... While with Firefox, ... > the installed plugins, ... > 2- I found Mozilla is now very stable, ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Where is mozilla installed?
      ... completed but when I go back to the browser and surf a flash page it ... The stuff is put into the plugins directory under one of the mozilla. ... then there is button as "Install missing plugins". ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Mozilla VS Fire Fox, was ( Rip Calvin The Dog 1995-2005)
      ... Still to me the web user, not web page composer, Mozilla has many features the way I like them that FireFox doesn't have. ... The I just find that it's the little features and items that Mozilla has that Fire Fox does not. ... Alot of the functionality is in the plugins which is the way it spozed to be. ...
      (alt.gathering.rainbow)