[OT] Layer 3 switching and vlans

From: Richard Humphrey (rlhumphrey_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/31/05

  • Next message: Chadley Wilson: "qt question" 
    Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:38:40 -0600
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    Forgive the OT of this post but I am stumped and not sure where to
    turn. I have a 3Com NBX 100 phone system (VOIP) and a 3Com Superstack
    3226 connected to our LAN in building A. We have Building B that is
    joined to the LAN via a Tsunami Quickbridge Wireless link.

    I am trying to seperate the NBX traffic into it's own vlan to control
    the broadcasting on our LAN. I successfully did this on Saturday
    during some testing but I ultimately blocked the phone traffic from
    reaching building B.

    My question is, do I need another 3226 in building B to route packets
    between the 2 networks for this to work. This is new technology to me
    (Layer 3 switching) and so I am not sure how to proceed to seperate
    phone traffic in both buildings.

    Thanks in advance for any input. 

    -- 
Richard Humphrey
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Chadley Wilson: "qt question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: multiple NATds and VLANs
      ... > each VLAN goes through a seperate NAT'd instance in order to ... Each buisiness has it's own LAN ... Each NATd uses seperate public IP's ... newbie, newbie, with such a problem on hand you are too modest! ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • remote control support
      ... We have 20 people in our company and spread in two seperate locations(same ... LAN). ... What is easiest way to do remote control support and also can be ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
    • Re: sucking rumpled notes into Pick
      ... control to take in REAL rumpled notes! ... any TWAIN-compliant scanner. ... You need to look at a better brand of OCR s/w! ... What is this "diminishing LAN quality" of which you speak? ...
      (comp.databases.pick)
    • Re: Hacked and remote controlled computer
      ... look for strange connections with netstat... ... > remote control aplication, which I couldn't found. ... on your LAN that blocks all potentially dangerous ports? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
    • Re: Intruders....?
      ... > If you can't control the building in this way, then quite frankly, you ... > get on the network physically, they still can't access the Internet. ... > this won't protect your LAN itself. ... Apparently the idea was to incorporate this technology in 2003 R2 but the ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)