Re: 100% Linux - Is it possible?

From: Robin Laing (Robin.Laing_at_drdc-rddc.gc.ca)
Date: 02/03/05

  • Next message: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: mount fstab"
    Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:43:10 -0700
    To: Johnathan Bailes <johnathan.bailes@gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Johnathan Bailes wrote:
    > On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:38:09 +0000, Pete Choppin <pchoppin@comcast.net> wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>I was just looking for a consensus on this...
    >>
    >>I have been working with Fedora Core 3 for the past month. My new years
    >>resolution was to learn Linux. So far, so good.
    >>
    >>I created a dual-boot Fedora / Windows XP. I am now seriously considering
    >>going completely 100% Linux and dumping my Windows partition entirely.
    >>
    >>The question is - can you live completely without Windows, or do you sooner
    >>or later have to resort to Windows again?
    >>
    >
    >
    > Questions for you should be something like this:
    >
    > Are you a heavy PC gamer? If so, keeping windows around is a
    > necessary evil even with the progress in wine. No, btw, console games
    > are NOT the same and not always better.
    >
    > Then again, I am not a heavy gamer.
    >
    > Do you do a lot of Visio or work with MS Project? If so, there are no
    > completely compatible solutions. Then again, I don't have a use for
    > either of those programs.
    >
    > I do not I admit do a lot of amateur video editing and have no idea
    > how linux is for that.
    >
    > No, if you are not put off by any of the above, then congrats you may
    > be ready for the jump.
    >
    > I use Abiword and gnumeric to open Word and Excel docs and gaim to IM
    > and I followed the FAQs and have even Quicktime videos working in
    > linux.
    >
    > I still have a dual boot system because my wife insists we keep it but
    > neither one of us has booted into the Windows side in forever.
    >
    > My only other bit of advice is to make sure you have plenty of ram.
    > Processor speed has never been a factor for me but Fedora seems to
    > like a box with 256MB or above and my laptop with 128MB feels a bit
    > slow but honestly a lot snappier than it did in RH9.
    >
    > The downside is that you better do your homework for buying hardware
    > from here on out. I have a Netgear wireless card I have to compile
    > the driver for every time I get a kernel update but my Brother HL 1440
    > printer and Nikon digital camera work with linux really well.
    >
    > The dag repositories have the gtkpod software if you have an iPod btw.
    >
    > The upside is that its free like speech man. There is a certain
    > freedom to be out from under the commercial software shackles of
    > always having to shell out cash for good programs and running in an
    > open source world. Plus, it is nice to be away from l33tster warez
    > culture that too many hardcore Windows folks roam around in and away
    > from the routine of virus scanning and spyware scanning my box every
    > night. Yuck. It is liberating at least for me. YMMV.
    >

    I have done video editing in Linux for the last year and half. There
    are some nice free/commercial products that give Linux professional
    tools for doing videos. Even been used on commercial movies such as
    Scooby Doo.

    Newer versions of Windows requires a larger amount of memory as well.
      I doubt that the requirements for RAM is actually much different
    between FC3 and Windows XP for decent operation.

    -- 
    Robin Laing
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: mount fstab"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Re: Deploring *nix Philosophy
      ... > you could set it so users could open and close the ppp interface at will. ... > initially invest in a fedora bible of sorts. ... > bring the complexity or power of the OS down to the level of a windows ... > sure that bringing Linux down to the level of windows home setup just to ...
      (Fedora)
    • Subject: RE: Fedora and the "normal" user
      ... I know all these are supported in Fedora, ... > has windows installed). ... those with less computer experience settle quicker than 'power ... I like to think windows has most things worked out from the users point of view so use Linux in the back end as much as I can, although saying that staff demanded to use Outlook 2003 last year and the only back end system that would fully support Outlook 2003 was of course exchange 2003. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Given Up on Linux
      ... >>My apologies, but unfortunately, I gave up on the L440GX with Fedora. ... >>Loaded Windows 2000 Server on it and it went fine. ... >>remarks to those who believe Linux is something to get so offended over ... > your hardware and there's always a fix somewhere. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: Evolutionary Humour
      ... gparted resize my ubuntu partition so I can make room for Fedora ... Linux distro, which is getting as far away from Microsoft as possible. ... mess around with and have Windows on separate machines? ...
      (talk.origins)
    • Re: {POLL} Windows Vista vs. Linux ? Worth the upgrade ? Worth the switchover
      ... are going to dump Windows for Linux rather than upgrade to Windows Vista ... I have no suggestions for your video editing however. ...
      (alt.os.linux)