Re: Has anyone dumped udev for devfs?

From: Markus Huber (humarfedoralists_at_yahoo.de)
Date: 02/06/05

  • Next message: Phil Schaffner: "Re: Does FC3 have CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI"
    Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 05:07:32 +0100
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Kevin Fries wrote:

    > The real bitch in all of this is that I am trying hard to eliminate
    > Windows in our workplace, and this incident set us way back. Because
    > Linux will not talk to a basic scanner, I just got "schooled" on why
    > Linux is imappropriate for all business use. Everyone in the forum
    > knows that this is crap, but we are talking about business not technical
    > people making the final decision (account not me writes the checks).
    > This is why beta (and udev is late alpha early beta stage) software
    > should not be in a stable distro tree!!!! This is business 101 people.
    > ~ How can we battle the Microsofting of our networks, with all its
    > security nightmares, if we can not offer an alternative that can talk to
    > a basic scanner, webcam (for video conferencing), etc?

    So you want a different policy of Fedora.

    I personally love the release cycle of Fedora Core, udev works perfectly
    on a desktop and a notebook here.

    In a company with +100 desktops I might not use Fedora Core as
    distribution at all, because I might go for a very conservative approach
    and might prefer longer lifecycles (Red Hat is providing such a solution
    as well, other distributors may provide that as well).

    But: the short release cycles and being able to use newest developments
      are the main reasons why I personally chose FC as my favorite
    distribution, and I work with it (so I do not use rawhide and do not
    install test-releases).

    As a user (I am not a developer, I am not a programmer, I work with FC
    and was able to quit using Windows at all thanks to Fedora) I definitely
    would not appreciate a more conservative approach of the FC-releases. If
    I would prefer that, I would change the distribution or use working
    FC-releases longer.

    And I love new hardware, and Fedora gives me the opportunity to use
    Linux with it. Other distributions failed with this task.

    -- 
    Regards
    Markus Huber
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Phil Schaffner: "Re: Does FC3 have CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_AHCI"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Where the h%^&^%$#! is KDE 4.1 ? Part II
      ... Linux people like yourself and decided they didn't want to be insulted ... I think its time the Fedora community took a long hard look at itself. ... the choice is picking a distribution that meets your needs. ... The goals of Fedora are ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Anything for home user and not the technical one??
      ... Linux and open source software; it has a very short version cycle time, ... Is not a proper distribution for home use, this may be correct, but we ... here (in Fedora I mean), ... Don't mind but it is always not good to suddenly switch to some other ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: yum flavors vs/ fc1, fc2, fc3...infinity
      ... > The distribution failed disastrously on fairly common machines. ... > and Fedora is the nearest to it. ... you can simply wait for others to install a release ... As for Linux generally, you have to ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: That ole Livna Problem/That ole VLC Problem
      ... If we understand that Fedora is an ideal enthusiast Linux then the whole 'user ... distribution, and does not claim to be. ... I think that the expectation of such a huge project as Fedora, ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Linux marketing / ads -- why not a centralized organization?
      ... it is (a loose confederacy of rouges against the business world "this is ... mine" mentality) which prevents there being a centralized anything beyond ... each distribution. ... One has to wonder what effect it would have on linux usage if the general ...
      (alt.os.linux)