Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?
From: Peter Kiem (zordah_at_zordah.net)
Date: 02/10/05
- Previous message: Peter Kiem: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- In reply to: Gene Heskett: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- Next in thread: Gene Heskett: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- Reply: Gene Heskett: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:25:46 +1000 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> I too had the fast clock problem, and by tickling the tick counter
> with the 'tickadj' command, was able to stay well within 1 second per
> hour. The bare command will return the current tick value, default
> is 10000, but I'm curently setting it at 9926 for accurate time
> keeping. This seems to be 2.6 problem as the default is pretty close
> on a 2.4.29 system running on an elderly TYAN mobo at 500mhz.
Where and how would you set the tickadj parameter?
Would you set it higher or lower for a system running too fast?
-- Regards, Peter Kiem Zordah IT - IT Consultancy and Internet Services Ph: (0414) 724-766 Fax: (07) 3344-5827 Web: www.zordah.net Email: zordah@zordah.net -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Peter Kiem: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- In reply to: Gene Heskett: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- Next in thread: Gene Heskett: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- Reply: Gene Heskett: "Re: NTP problem - Clock too fast for NTP to keep up?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]