Re Media Kit for fedora

From: Aakash Munjal (aakash_at_almoayedgroup.com)
Date: 02/24/05

  • Next message: Chris: "Re: GFS and Fedora"
    Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:00:28 -0500 (EST)
    To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    
    

    Thanks a lot for such a prompt response.
    Now as far as download is concerned, can i download the software to my
    windows 2000 professional machine and then use the files to install
    fedora.
    If not then which is the minimum version of linux i must have to download
    fedora.

    best regards,
    Aakash Munjal

    > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    >
    > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    > fedora-list-request@redhat.com
    >
    > You can reach the person managing the list at
    > fedora-list-owner@redhat.com
    >
    > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
    >
    >
    > Today's Topics:
    >
    > 1. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (Alexander Spanke)
    > 2. Re: kernel sources (Jeff Vian)
    > 3. RE: A few quick newbie questions... (Erik Hemdal)
    > 4. Re: new to list (Mark Haney)
    > 5. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (A. Lanza)
    > 6. Re: Fedora 3 DNS configuration (David Cary Hart)
    > 7. Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Mark Haney)
    > 8. Re: kernel sources (David Cary Hart)
    > 9. Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Paul Howarth)
    > 10. Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1 (Mark Haney)
    > 11. Fedora 2 core and Zebra As a FC2 Router box Help (Eric)
    > 12. Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed (Jeff Vian)
    > 13. Re: Distributed file system (Matthew Miller)
    > 14. Re: a stupid question about rpmbuild in fc3 (Giulio Sorrentino)
    > 15. GFS and Fedora (Giulio Sorrentino)
    > 16. Re: GFS and Fedora (Daniel Ch?nard)
    > 17. desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login (Eliot Stock)
    > 18. Re: new to list (Giulio Sorrentino)
    > 19. Re: GFS and Fedora (Rahul Sundaram)
    > 20. Re: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login
    > (Rahul Sundaram)
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 1
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:50 +0100
    > From: Alexander Spanke <aspanke@hpce.nec.com>
    > Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed
    > To: Fedora List <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109250951.2676.56.camel@riker>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > on what kind of fs do you create this image ?
    >
    > Cheers
    > Alex
    >
    > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote:
    >> Hi list,
    >>
    >> i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. I'm
    >> using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. file.
    >> The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long.
    >>
    >> The message i get from k3b is the following:
    >> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type
    >> and then
    >> File <file> is too large - ignoring
    >>
    >> It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit in
    >> a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written to
    >> DVD?
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>
    >> Alf
    >>
    >>
    > --
    > =======================================================
    > Alexander Spanke System Analyst
    > NEC High Performance Computing Europe GmbH
    > Prinzenallee 11 D-40549 Duesseldorf, Germany
    > Tel: +49 211 5369 146 aspanke@hpce.nec.com
    > Fax: +49 211 5369 199 http://www.hpce.nec.com
    > =======================================================
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 2
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:20:23 -0600
    > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@charter.net>
    > Subject: Re: kernel sources
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109251224.10707.68.camel@goliath.lab.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:03 -0500, H. Crissman wrote:
    >> I can't find the kernel-sources rpm for kernel 2.6-9 or 2.6-10? Am I
    >> missing
    >> something? I am looking for them on the yum repos.
    >>
    >> H. Crissman
    >>
    > Look in the source SRPMS repo
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 3
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:20:43 -0500
    > From: "Erik Hemdal" <ehemdal@townisp.com>
    > Subject: RE: A few quick newbie questions...
    > To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20050224132046.B451729952@ns1.townisp.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    >
    >
    >> Using a 200GIG WD harddrive and VIA EPIA M10000 mini-ITX
    >> motherboard with 512 megs of RAM....
    >>
    >> #1 - I do the install, no problems as far as I can tell, then
    >> it has to do a reboot. It gets to where it is then asking
    >> for a "username" in the middle of the screen. I don't have a
    >> username. At some point during the install it forces me to
    >> put in an admin name or something, but that user/pass doesn't
    >
    > Yes you do. At a minimum, you have a username 'root'. The password is
    > that
    > which you established for the administrator during installation. You
    > should
    > also set up a separate "user's" account and use that account for your
    > everyday work.
    >
    >> work. Is there a way during the install to tell it "hey, no
    >> freaking user/pass on this computer"?
    >
    > No. Linux is a true multiuser and multitasking OS. Having specific
    > usernames and passwords allows you to have better control over your system
    > and makes it more secure. The tiny inconvenience of logging in is worth
    > the
    > benefit.
    >
    > I can think of one way in which you could avoid usernames and passwords
    > (there may be others) but this is extra work to make the system easier to
    > break. Set up users, and save yourself grief.
    >
    > Log in as user root, with the password you set, and run
    >
    > system-config-users
    >
    > at a shell prompt (System Settings > Users and Groups on the menu) to set
    > up
    > an ordinary user's account.
    >>
    >> #2 - Want to do a dual boot between XP and Linux. Do I
    >> partition the harddrive first, then install XP, then install Linux?
    >
    > That is what I would do to create a dual-boot system. If you are working
    > on
    > a system which currently contains XP, reduce the size of your NTFS
    > partition
    > to make space for Fedora. Do not alter the small FAT partition which XP
    > has
    > created (XP needs a FAT partition to work). Leave the freed up space
    > unpartitioned. Anaconda will handle formatting for you when you choose to
    > install in unpartitioned space.
    >
    > Hope this helps. Erik
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 4
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:22:18 -0500
    > From: Mark Haney <markh@uptimecomputer.net>
    > Subject: Re: new to list
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109251338.6468.11.camel@fedora.uptimecomputer.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:13 +0300, Aakash wrote:
    >> hi all,
    >
    > Welcome. Always glad to see new people on the list.
    >>
    >> I am a new member of the group and first thing that i would like to
    >> know is how to get the software.
    >
    > Best way to get it is to download it:
    >
    > http://fedora.redhat.com/download/
    >
    > this is a good place to start.
    >
    >
    >> How can i get the media kit for fedora project?
    >>
    >>
    >> Best Regards,
    >> Aakash Munjal
    >>
    >> --
    >> fedora-list mailing list
    >> fedora-list@redhat.com
    >> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    >
    > --------------------------------------
    > Mark Haney
    > markh@uptimecomputer.net
    > Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux
    > 08:20:34 up 18:48, 2 users, load average: 1.06, 1.15, 0.76
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 5
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:23:47 +0100
    > From: "A. Lanza" <alf@lanza-ti.com>
    > Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109251427.29276.13.camel@aubrey.ayto.local>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    >
    > El jue, 24-02-2005 a las 14:15 +0100, Alexander Spanke escribió:
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> on what kind of fs do you create this image ?
    >
    > All my partitions are ext3.
    >
    >> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote:
    >> > Hi list,
    >> >
    >> > i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning.
    >> I'm
    >> > using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB.
    >> file.
    >> > The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long.
    >> >
    >> > The message i get from k3b is the following:
    >> > /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type
    >> > and then
    >> > File <file> is too large - ignoring
    >> >
    >> > It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit
    >> in
    >> > a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written
    >> to
    >> > DVD?
    >> >
    >> > Thanks,
    >> >
    >> > Alf
    >> >
    >> >
    >> --
    >> =======================================================
    >> Alexander Spanke System Analyst
    >> NEC High Performance Computing Europe GmbH
    >> Prinzenallee 11 D-40549 Duesseldorf, Germany
    >> Tel: +49 211 5369 146 aspanke@hpce.nec.com
    >> Fax: +49 211 5369 199 http://www.hpce.nec.com
    >> =======================================================
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 6
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:26:13 -0500
    > From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@TQMcube.com>
    > Subject: Re: Fedora 3 DNS configuration
    > To: ssalviche@hotmail.com, For users of Fedora Core releases
    > <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109251573.3341.3.camel@dch.TQMcube.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:59 +0100, Santiago (PapaOso) wrote:
    >> Hi there,
    >>
    >> Ill try to make this quick.
    >>
    >> Im trying to set 8 computers in a lab room all interconnected to a
    >> router. I got assigned to set mine as a DNS server, and I dont know
    >> where to start. Please, any chance of guidance ?.
    >>
    > I assume that you are trying to create a caching name server for the
    > LAN. DHCP or static LAN IPs?
    >
    >
    > --
    >
    > Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
    > Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
    > Daily Updates: http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm
    > rsync -l tqmcube.com::spamlists
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 7
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:28:10 -0500
    > From: Mark Haney <markh@uptimecomputer.net>
    > Subject: Slightly OT - FC4T1
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <1109251690.6468.14.camel@fedora.uptimecomputer.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question.
    > What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid-
    > March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone
    > know?
    >
    > --------------------------------------
    > Mark Haney
    > markh@uptimecomputer.net
    > Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux
    > 08:26:44 up 18:55, 2 users, load average: 0.44, 0.52, 0.58
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 8
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:28:28 -0500
    > From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@TQMcube.com>
    > Subject: Re: kernel sources
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109251708.3341.6.camel@dch.TQMcube.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 23:03 -0500, H. Crissman wrote:
    >> I can't find the kernel-sources rpm for kernel 2.6-9 or 2.6-10? Am I
    >> missing
    >> something?
    >
    > Yes. You missed the release notes.
    >
    > This may then help:
    > http://www.tqmcube.com/fc3_custom_kernel.htm
    > --
    >
    > Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
    > Fight Spam: http://www.tqmcube.com/rbldnsd.htm
    > Daily Updates: http://www.tqmcube.com/spam_trap.htm
    > rsync -l tqmcube.com::spamlists
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 9
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:29:43 +0000
    > From: Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
    > Subject: Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <421DD6C7.4060609@city-fan.org>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    >
    > Mark Haney wrote:
    >> I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question.
    >> What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid-
    >> March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone
    >> know?
    >
    > http://lwn.net/Articles/124798/
    >
    > Paul.
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 10
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:32:10 -0500
    > From: Mark Haney <markh@uptimecomputer.net>
    > Subject: Re: Slightly OT - FC4T1
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109251930.6468.16.camel@fedora.uptimecomputer.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 13:29 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
    >> Mark Haney wrote:
    >> > I know this isn't the test list, but this is more a general question.
    >> > What's the story with the pushing back the release of FC4T1 to mid-
    >> > March? This is more just curiousity than anything else. Does anyone
    >> > know?
    >>
    >> http://lwn.net/Articles/124798/
    >>
    >> Paul.
    >
    > Perfect. Thanks for the heads up.
    >>
    >
    > --------------------------------------
    > Mark Haney
    > markh@uptimecomputer.net
    > Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) Kernel: 2.6.10-1.766_FC3 GNU/Linux
    > 08:31:57 up 19:00, 2 users, load average: 0.37, 0.65, 0.62
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 11
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:52:19 -0500
    > From: Eric <emac@cybergps.net>
    > Subject: Fedora 2 core and Zebra As a FC2 Router box Help
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <opsmpfhhk0u4h0jv@thinkpadbr.go.salve.edu>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes;
    > charset=iso-8859-15
    >
    > Hi im setting up a router box with Fedora core 2 and zebra i use a
    > buisness cable modem line with 6 static ip's coming out of it i would like
    > to setup 1 ip address to dhcpd a server for my LAN but also have my other
    > 5 ip's routed to private ips so i can just set adapter to a private
    > ip which is really a static.... So looking for info on if first do i need
    > a ethernet adapter for every IP or can i call all statics from one
    > wan/internet adapter... also lets say i have the static 24.249.24.2-6 with
    > a gateway of 24.249.24.1 now i want to take one of those ips first
    > lets say 24.249.24.2 and assign that to boxes main dhcpd server for
    > private network of a range like 192.168.100.2-100 1 being gateway
    > ofcourse... now i want to route the other ips's like 24.249.24.3 to
    > private address like 192.168.100.101 and so on for each address can anyone
    > help me with this i also know i need to use atleast 2 nics in box and i
    > probally can get the dhcpd server up pretty easy im betting but just need
    > to setup this up right ASAP
    >
    > --
    > Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 12
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:06:53 -0600
    > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@charter.net>
    > Subject: Re: DVD burning - mkisofs max size allowed
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109254013.10707.85.camel@goliath.lab.net>
    > Content-Type: text/plain
    >
    > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 14:12 +0100, A. Lanza wrote:
    >> Hi list,
    >>
    >> i'm trying to burn a DVD using k3b, as i usually do for CD burning. I'm
    >> using 4,7GB size DVD-R. The problem is that i cannot burn a 4,4GB. file.
    >> The file is exactly 4,613,704,668 bytes long.
    >>
    >> The message i get from k3b is the following:
    >> /usr/bin/mkisofs: Value too large for defined data type
    >> and then
    >> File <file> is too large - ignoring
    >>
    >> It seems like the problem is the file size, but that file should fit in
    >> a DVD, shouldn't it? Is there any limit in the size of files written to
    >> DVD?
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>
    >> Alf
    >>
    >
    > What are you telling k3b to do?
    > Are you telling it to burn a data dvd, a CD, an iso image, or burn the
    > iso image to dvd?
    >
    > a DVD is made by k3b using growisofs to do the labor, and burning that
    > image to the DVD. But if you chose a CD project it will not allow it
    > because of the amount of data.
    >
    > I create a data DVD by using { file -> new project -> new data DVD
    > project } then creating the file list to be included with drag-n-drop.
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 13
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:08:00 -0500
    > From: Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org>
    > Subject: Re: Distributed file system
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <20050224140800.GA1913@jadzia.bu.edu>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    >
    > On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:57:51PM +0000, Jonathan Allen wrote:
    >> I can understand how the user directories work, but how do you manage
    >> the sharing of /etc/passwd, /etc/group, /etc/shadow etc ?
    >
    > rpm -qi nss_ldap
    >
    >
    > --
    > Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
    > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 14
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:09:32 +0100
    > From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora@wooow.it>
    > Subject: Re: a stupid question about rpmbuild in fc3
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <421DE01C.1050009@wooow.it>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
    >
    > BJACE MK Raymond Xu wrote:
    >
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> I installed FC3 on my PC with a distribution of 4 CDs. But
    >> after hosting that PC I found that I can't use rpmbuild or rpm -b. I
    >> didn't choose to install everything. So could you tell me what else
    >> package to install to use rpmbuild?
    >>
    >>
    >> Thanks in advance,
    >> raynix
    >
    > [numerone@numeronesoft ~]$ su -c "yum whatprovides rpmbuild"
    > Password:
    > Searching Packages:
    > Setting up Repo: base
    > repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
    > Setting up Repo: updates-released
    > repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
    > Setting up Repo: freshrpms
    > repomd.xml 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
    > Reading repository metadata in from local files
    > base : ################################################## 2622/2622
    > primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 290 kB 00:07
    > MD Read : ################################################## 678/678
    > updates-re: ################################################## 678/678
    > primary.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 146 kB 00:00
    > MD Read : ################################################## 477/477
    > freshrpms : ################################################## 477/477
    > Importing Additional filelist information for packages
    > base : ################################################## 2622/2622
    > filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 2.7 MB 00:43
    > MD Read : ################################################## 678/678
    > updates-re: ################################################## 678/678
    > filelists.xml.gz 100% |=========================| 225 kB 00:01
    > MD Read : ################################################## 477/477
    > freshrpms : ################################################## 477/477
    >
    >
    > rpm-build.i386 4.3.2-21 base
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/bin/rpmbuild
    > /usr/share/man/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
    > /usr/bin/rpmbuild
    > name 4.1-1
    >
    >
    > rpm-libs.i386 4.3.2-21 base
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.3.so
    > librpmbuild-4.3.so
    >
    >
    > rpm-devel.i386 4.3.2-21 base
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/include/rpm/rpmbuild.h
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.so
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.a
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h-source.html
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/group__rpmbuild.html
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h.html
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.la
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/structrpmBuildArguments__s.html
    >
    >
    > rpm.i386 4.3.2-21 base
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/share/man/pl/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
    > /usr/share/man/ja/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
    >
    >
    > rpm-libs.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild-4.3.so
    > librpmbuild-4.3.so
    >
    >
    > rpm-devel.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/include/rpm/rpmbuild.h
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.a
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.la
    > /usr/lib/librpmbuild.so
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/group__rpmbuild.html
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h-source.html
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/rpmbuild_8h.html
    > /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.3.2/apidocs/html/structrpmBuildArguments__s.html
    >
    >
    > rpm-build.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/bin/rpmbuild
    > /usr/share/man/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
    > rpmbuild(VendorConfig)
    >
    >
    > rpm.i386 4.3.2-21 installed
    > Matched from:
    > /usr/share/man/ja/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
    > /usr/share/man/pl/man8/rpmbuild.8.gz
    > [numerone@numeronesoft ~]$
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 15
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:03 +0100
    > From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora@wooow.it>
    > Subject: GFS and Fedora
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <421DE077.8070209@wooow.it>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
    >
    > Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem?
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 16
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:15:36 -0500
    > From: Daniel Ch?nard <dchenard@infoteck.qc.ca>
    > Subject: Re: GFS and Fedora
    > To: Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <1109254537.5876.51.camel@pclinux.infoteck.ca>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
    >
    > I dont think it's for end/home user...
    >
    > It's more for Enterprise with more Filesystem server. This is for a
    > failover / High availability server / clustering filesystem
    >
    > Le jeudi 24 février 2005 à 15:11 +0100, Giulio Sorrentino a écrit :
    >> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem?
    >>
    > --
    > Daniel Chénard
    > SysAdmin Unix
    > Infoteck Internet
    > 5480, Boul. Jean XXIII
    > Trois-Rivières-Ouest, Québec
    > Canada
    > G8Z 4A9
    > Tel: 819-370-3232
    > Sans Frais: 1-866-853-3232
    > Fax: 819-370-3624
    >
    > PS: The Light at the End of The Tunnel
    > will be turned off until further
    > notice due to budget cutbacks.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 17
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:11 +0000
    > From: Eliot Stock <fedora_list@eliotstock.com>
    > Subject: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login
    > To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > Message-ID: <20050224141711.9trlvzs8gogs8okw@eliotstock.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    >
    > Afternoon everyone.
    >
    > Something funny is up with nautilus on my FC3 box.
    >
    > When I log in the desktop icons aren't rendered. ps -aux shows:
    >
    >
    > eliot 6044 0.9 1.0 34720 8040 ? Ssl 12:49 0:00 nautilus
    > --no-default-window --sm-client-id default3
    >
    >
    > If I wait 5 or 10 minutes, they eventually show up and that process
    > disappears
    > to be replaced with:
    >
    >
    > eliot 6190 0.6 2.5 44084 19664 ? Ssl 12:53 0:01 nautilus
    > --sm-client-id 117f000001000110924937300000059310001 --screen 0
    >
    >
    > It's been like this for a few weeks now and I also noticed my iPod doesn't
    > automount anymore when I plug it in like it used to (over firewire). Don't
    > know
    > if that's related. My machine is up to date.
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > Eliot Stock.
    >
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 18
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:24:16 +0100
    > From: Giulio Sorrentino <numerone.fedora@wooow.it>
    > Subject: Re: new to list
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <421DE390.4080006@wooow.it>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    >
    > Aakash wrote:
    >
    >> hi all,
    >>
    >> I am a new member of the group and first thing that i would like to
    >> know is how to get the software.How can i get the media kit for fedora
    >> project?
    >>
    >>
    >> Best Regards,
    >> Aakash Munjal
    >
    > Fedora does not have a media kit: you have to download and install
    > programs manually.
    > I think you are searching an audio and a vide player: i suggest you xmms
    > for audio (which is included in fedora) and kaffeine for video (try a
    > search using www.fedoratracker.org).
    > For using yum (fedora installer) I suggest you a GUI, such as yumex
    > (http://linux.rasmil.dk/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=52&Itemid=41).
    >
    > Wellcome.
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 19
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:58:48 +0530
    > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Re: GFS and Fedora
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <c79487d60502240628903c087@mail.gmail.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    >
    > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:11:03 +0100, Giulio Sorrentino
    > <numerone.fedora@wooow.it> wrote:
    >> Which could be advantages for home users using that filesystem?
    >
    > Though its a common perception Fedora isnt solely meant to be used by
    > home users.
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Rahul Sundaram
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > Message: 20
    > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:59:53 +0530
    > From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Re: desktop icons take 10 mins to appear after login
    > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > Message-ID: <c79487d605022406293872224a@mail.gmail.com>
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    >
    > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:17:11 +0000, Eliot Stock
    > <fedora_list@eliotstock.com> wrote:
    >> Afternoon everyone.
    >>
    >> Something funny is up with nautilus on my FC3 box.
    >>
    >> When I log in the desktop icons aren't rendered. ps -aux shows:
    >>
    >> eliot 6044 0.9 1.0 34720 8040 ? Ssl 12:49 0:00 nautilus
    >> --no-default-window --sm-client-id default3
    >>
    >> If I wait 5 or 10 minutes, they eventually show up and that process
    >> disappears
    >> to be replaced with:
    >>
    >> eliot 6190 0.6 2.5 44084 19664 ? Ssl 12:53 0:01 nautilus
    >> --sm-client-id 117f000001000110924937300000059310001 --screen 0
    >>
    >> It's been like this for a few weeks now and I also noticed my iPod
    >> doesn't
    >> automount anymore when I plug it in like it used to (over firewire).
    >> Don't know
    >> if that's related. My machine is up to date.
    >
    > please file bug reports against nautilus and the kernel in
    > bugzilla.redhat.com.
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > Rahul Sundaram
    >
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------
    >
    > --
    > fedora-list mailing list
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    >
    > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 12, Issue 384
    > ********************************************
    >

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Chris: "Re: GFS and Fedora"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Fedora 10 Live -- No Development Tools?
      ... The Live version is a minimal subset of Fedora, it doesn't include any development tools, the DVD version has everything. ... However the Live version is actually a better way to do the install because Fedora has so many updates that virtually everything on the DVD will have to be updated after the install anyway. ... Where would I download the iso file from? ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Re: To update or not to update? Fedora 9
      ... > install Fedora. ... Upon doing a sudo yum update I get ... Total download size: 802 M ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: Install DVD
      ... direct download for Fedora 10 and burned a DVD with K3B but the DVD would ... was related to ConsoleKit. ... Well I found out that I could see the DVD on a windows machine and that my daughters Fedora 8 machine could mount it just fine. ... I haven't done an install on 8 or 9 because so much stuff has to be backed up and restored and I fear that doing an upgrade to 10 may have problems. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Newbie Help With Fedora 9 installation
      ... I have Fedora 7 installed....is that a problem?? ... I have already downloaded the DVD ISO again and verified the file with the ... First download the Rescue CD, which smaller size that a full DVD ISO. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Newby Problem
      ... > I have installed Fedora core 4 on one of my machines and all seems well ... On every package that I select I receive ... Even though they all install and work fine it is a real ... >> Yes, when I copy it on my PC, it opens properly ...
      (Fedora)