New Firefox vs. Up2date
From: Jonathan Ryshpan (jonrysh_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 02/28/05
- Previous message: Max L. Eidswick: "RE: grub question ..."
- Next in thread: Pasha R: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Reply: Pasha R: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Reply: Scott G. Elliott: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Reply: Satish Balay: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Maybe reply: Tim Holmes: "RE: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Fedora List <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:27:31 -0800
The Red Hat Network Notification Tool (KDE Applet) tells me correctly
that there is a new version of Firefox available. The version on the
nachine is firefox-1.0-2.fc3.x86_64.rpm, while the latest version on the
server is firefox-1.0.1-1.3.1.x86_64.rpm. Nevertheless, up2date doesn't
report the new version as available for installation.
Does anyone know why this is? Is the new firefox worth hand
installation?
-- Jonathan Ryshpan <jonrysh@pacbell.net> Berkeley Linux Team -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Max L. Eidswick: "RE: grub question ..."
- Next in thread: Pasha R: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Reply: Pasha R: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Reply: Scott G. Elliott: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Reply: Satish Balay: "Re: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Maybe reply: Tim Holmes: "RE: New Firefox vs. Up2date"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|