Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no
From: Matt Florido (matt_at_floridonet.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Previous message: Frank Tanner III: "Re: Security Breach ?"
- In reply to: Scot L. Harris: "Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no"
- Next in thread: Brian Mury: "Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no"
- Reply: Brian Mury: "Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:55:47 -0800 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
* Scot L. Harris <webid@cfl.rr.com> [03-03-2005 16:23]:
>
> Several things to remember about spamassassin. Bayes will not be used
> until it has learned 200 spam and 200 ham messages. If you are below
> that threshold it does not use bayes to compute the score.
>
Slight correction, it's 100 each of spam and ham for Bayes to activate.
(200 total)
> Also it will not autolearn spam unless the score is over a certain
> threshold for both header and message rules ( I think the default is
> 10).
>
Default threshold for spam is 5.0.
See wiki page below.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
"Finally, SpamAssassin requires at least 3 points from the header and 3
points from the body, to auto-learn as spam. If either section
contributes fewer points, the message will not be auto-learned."
-- Matt -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Frank Tanner III: "Re: Security Breach ?"
- In reply to: Scot L. Harris: "Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no"
- Next in thread: Brian Mury: "Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no"
- Reply: Brian Mury: "Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 autolearn=ham/spam/no"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|