Parportscanner and Sane.
From: Philip Moller (phmo_at_punkt.se)
Date: 03/06/05
- Previous message: javier perez: "Re: ndiswrapper problems"
- Next in thread: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Parportscanner and Sane."
- Reply: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Parportscanner and Sane."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:20:54 +0100 To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Hi Alexander !
Thanks for responding.
Yes, I still have problems to get my parportscanner to work in Linux.
The scanner is stonedead, no matter what I do ... But it works great in
Win98.
You said I should use strace ...
Ok, I haven't tested that, so way not ?
But IŽam getting error when I do the code you recommended ?
I get this:
[root] # strace -o /tmp/scan.txt SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=1 scanimage -L
strace: SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=1: command not found
What am I doing wrong ?
>> I do not see why you installed the sane-backend from sources. Didn't
>> SANE shipping with Fedora Core work either? Do you have the RPM
>> installed too? Could be a conflict then now.
I installed from sources, because I wanted the latest version
(sane-backends-1.0.15).
No, the sane-version that shipped with Fedora Core didn't work either.
No, I havent the RPM installed also, that package is deinstalled.
So, there is no conflicts with other sane-packages.
IŽve also posted my problem to Fedoraforum:
http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=44825
>> I must say that your posting is a fine example how a good problem
>> description looks like. Excellent.
Thank you !
I realy want a solution on my problem, so I hope there is no
misunderstandings.
My native language is swedish, so I hope my english is intelligible.
Any help on my problem, is appreciated.
-- Greetings! Philip Moller Malmo, Sweden > Am Mi, den 02.03.2005 schrieb Philip Moller um 18:08: > > >>> When I print "sane-find-scanner -p" in the console, I get this: >>> >>> [root] # sane-find-scanner -p >>> found possible Mustek parallel port scanner at "parport0" >>> >>> So, "sane-find-scanner" detects my scanner... >>> >>> But when I print "SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=1 scanimage -L", I get this: >>> >>> [root] # SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=1 scanimage -L >>> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of mustek_pp to 1. >>> >>> I am waiting !!! >>> Here it freezes, nothing happends .... > > > Maybe the usage of "strace" helps to find out whats going on. > > strace -o /tmp/scan.txt SANE_DEBUG_MUSTEK_PP=1 scanimage -L > less /tmp/scan.txt > > I do not see why you installed the sane-backend from sources. Didn't > SANE shipping with Fedora Core work either? Do you have the RPM > installed too? Could be a conflict then now. > > >>> Philip Moller > > > I must say that your posting is a fine example how a good problem > description looks like. Excellent. > > Alexander > > > -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.14_FC2smp Serendipity 18:19:56 up 9 days, 5:28, load average: 0.54, 0.47, 0.35 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: javier perez: "Re: ndiswrapper problems"
- Next in thread: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Parportscanner and Sane."
- Reply: Alexander Dalloz: "Re: Parportscanner and Sane."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
