Re: Multihomed proxy serving 2 wireless networks

From: Paul Howarth (paul_at_city-fan.org)
Date: 03/08/05

  • Next message: Kevin Plew: "Re: Multihomed proxy serving 2 wireless networks"
    Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 10:37:19 +0000
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Kevin Plew wrote:
    > I'm trying to setup 2 wireless networks being served by one server with 2
    > NICs. I need 2 wireless networks due to the number of subscibers. The
    > server will provide dhcp, dns and a proxy. The proxy is required by my
    > satellite provider. DHCP and DNS both work correctly, but the proxy is
    > only able to connect to the server @ 10.10.11.50 via eth0. eth1 will not
    > connect. I am able to route to eth0 but not to eth1. I have tried adding
    > the following to /etc/sysconfig:
    >
    > network-scripts/route-eth0 containing 10.10.11.50 via 192.168.1.1
    > network-scripts/route-eth1 containing 10.10.11.50 via 192.168.100.1
    >
    > The only route that shows up is the route via 192.168.1.1.
    >
    > I have tried adding static routes, but then niether interface connected.
    >
    > Is there any way to accomplish what I am trying to do?

    Is your FC2 server also serving as a router to connect your 2 wireless
    LANs together?

    I don't think you really need to be able to connect to 10.10.11.50 via
    both interfaces. If the clients on network 192.168.1.0/24 are assigned a
    gateway of 192.168.1.20 (your eth0) and the clients on network
    192.168.100.0/24 are assigned a gateway of 192.168.100.20 (your eth1),
    then they should all send packets for any off-net addresses such as
    10.10.11.50 to you. You only then need a single route to that IP in
    order to be able to forward those packets to the right destination.

    So you should be able to get rid of network-scripts/route-eth1 and the
    clients on that network should still be able to send packets to
    10.10.11.50, by forwarding the packets to you (who has IP forwarding
    turned on), and you forward the packet via eth0 to 10.10.11.50.

    Paul.

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Kevin Plew: "Re: Multihomed proxy serving 2 wireless networks"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Update: UDP 770 Potential Worm
      ... > the network immediately after the 'attack', ... were no packets indicating some form of replication. ... I noticed that the UDP ... > of the UDP datagrams is the IP address of the proxy? ...
      (Incidents)
    • Re: Update: UDP 770 Potential Worm
      ... > were no packets indicating some form of replication. ... > my capture was limited due to the switched ... to see if the problem occurs on the test network, ... The proxy had already been isolated from the ...
      (Incidents)
    • Re: [SLE] Internet Problem Over LAN
      ... It says that packets are getting out from the SuSE box up ... traceroute packets or the route has ... routing problem from your network, ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Multi-homing with win2k srv
      ... interface that connects to the Internet. ... I would install Network Monitor and capture packets on each external ... The destination does not match any specific route so it will be sent to your ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.ras_routing)
    • Re: [SLE] Internet Problem Over LAN
      ... >>can route out of your network up to a certain point. ... You should capture packets from the Windows box that works and compare ... to packets from the SuSE box that doesn't. ... You can route out of your network, ...
      (SuSE)