Re: Remove me from your email list please!

From: Adam Stokes (adam.stokes_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/30/05

  • Next message: Paul Howarth: "Re: bad posting habits, jeremy bernstein and scientific cranks"
    Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:06:03 -0500
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list :\

    On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:58:02 -0600, sunny McCoy
    <sunnyloveless@hotmail.com> wrote:
    > I have received approx 500 emails from you recently. I didn't I ask for
    > that,all I wanted was help downloading & burning Fedora 2 or 3. Thanks for
    > nothing but a pain in my ___. As much as I would love to try your product
    > 500 emails is too much. Sunny
    >
    > >From: fedora-list-request@redhat.com
    > >Reply-To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > >To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > >Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 13, Issue 397
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:11:16 -0500 (EST)
    > >
    > >Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
    > > fedora-list@redhat.com
    > >
    > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    > >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    > > fedora-list-request@redhat.com
    > >
    > >You can reach the person managing the list at
    > > fedora-list-owner@redhat.com
    > >
    > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    > >than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
    > >
    > >
    > >Today's Topics:
    > >
    > > 1. Re: Top Posting and company disclaimer (Jim Cornette)
    > > 2. Re: Wireless card active, no connection to Internet -RESOLVED
    > > (apparently) (Richard S. Crawford)
    > > 3. /var/spool/up2date (Frank Stratton - VE3YY)
    > > 4. Re: mirroring websites solution? wget problems (Cameron Simpson)
    > > 5. Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (Richard S. Crawford)
    > > 6. Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (Chris Ruprecht)
    > > 7. Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook (Marius Andreiana)
    > > 8. Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (Richard S. Crawford)
    > > 9. Oracle 9i and FC3/RHEL 4 howto (gaurav)
    > > 10. Re: Wireless connectivity - was resolved, then unresolved,
    > > now RESOLVED!!! (Richard S. Crawford)
    > > 11. Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook (D. D. Brierton)
    > > 12. Re: Top Posting.... (Gene Heskett)
    > > 13. Herding cats, Was: Top Posting.... (Sam Williams)
    > > 14. Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved (G S)
    > > 15. Re: wide screen laptop problem (G S)
    > > 16. Snort failing at Boot (Mark Sargent)
    > > 17. Strange message during "yum update" in FC3 (Joachim Backes)
    > > 18. Re: wide screen laptop problem (Chris Stark)
    > >
    > >
    > >----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 1
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:27:50 -0500
    > >From: Jim Cornette <fc-cornette@insight.rr.com>
    > >Subject: Re: Top Posting and company disclaimer
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <424A2AC6.4000807@insight.rr.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
    > >
    > >Kam Leo wrote:
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > The fedora-list subscription page should contain a great big notice
    > > > that the list contents are not shielded from public viewing.
    > > > Regardless of disclaimer(s) restricting access, dissemination, etc.
    > > > when one posts to this list one posts to a public forum.
    > > >
    > >
    > >What would happen with te disclaimers if one was to end there mail
    > >message with a . on a line by itself? Would the disclaimer still be
    > >tagged to the bottom of messages?
    > >
    > >Jim
    > >
    > >.
    > >
    > >You should not see this (test)
    > >
    > >--
    > >In the Spring, I have counted 136 different kinds of weather inside of
    > >24 hours.
    > > -- Mark Twain, on New England weather
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 2
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:28:08 -0800
    > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Subject: Re: Wireless card active, no connection to Internet -RESOLVED
    > > (apparently)
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <200503292028.08583.rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    > >
    > >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 8:18 pm, Richard S. Crawford flailed at a keyboard
    > >and produced this:
    > >
    > > > However, it simply won't connect. I've tried everything I can think of,
    > > > including disabling WEP, and nothing seems to get this card talking to
    > >the
    > > > Internet. I can't even ping my default gateway, 192.168.1.1.
    > >
    > >Well, I stopped the pcmcia service and removed the card, then put it back
    > >in,
    > >thus crashing the system. When I rebooted, I was shocked to find that my
    > >wireless card is working.
    > >
    > >Typical. As soon as I post about it, the thing starts working. I swear,
    > >they're like cats sometimes.
    > >
    > >
    > >--
    > >Slainte,
    > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@mossroot.com)
    > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com
    > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus."
    > >-Mark Twain
    > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc
    > >-------------- next part --------------
    > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > >Name: not available
    > >Type: application/pgp-signature
    > >Size: 189 bytes
    > >Desc: not available
    > >Url :
    > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/2f381a4a/attachment.bin
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 3
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:37:23 -0500
    > >From: "Frank Stratton - VE3YY" <fstratton@rogers.com>
    > >Subject: /var/spool/up2date
    > >To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <ABEGLIFOIHMFMMCMCGMCEEGCDJAA.fstratton@rogers.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    > >
    > >Thanks Alexander,
    > >
    > >I also moved the directory over to an alternate disk and put in a symbolic
    > >link. I found 3587 files in the up2date directory but it only has a few
    > >RPM
    > >files. Seems like a lot of information to keep around. I upgraded this
    > >system from Fedora Core 2 to Core 3 and applied the updates. I can't say
    > >that I'm very happy with the upgrade path. I lost the automount of CDROMs
    > >and some packages have some mysterious problems. I think I will back up my
    > >data the next time and "upgrade" by simply loading a new version and
    > >replacing the OS.
    > >
    > >Cheers,
    > >Frank
    > >
    > >Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:39:57 +0200
    > >From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists@uni-x.org>
    > >Subject: Re: Var/spool/up2date
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <1111891197.11539.196.camel@serendipity.dogma.lan>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    > >
    > >Am So, den 27.03.2005 schrieb Frank Stratton - VE3YY um 3:52:
    > >
    > > > My /var/spool/up2date has grown to the point where it has over 300 MB of
    > > > files in it. Can I delete the files in this directory?
    > >
    > > > Frank
    > >
    > >Keep the .hdr files. I suggest you reconfigure up2date to not keep the
    > >RPMs after installation, if disk space is an issue for you.
    > >
    > >Alexander
    > >
    > >
    > >--
    > >Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
    > >legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
    > >Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC2smp
    > >Serendipity 04:38:57 up 10 days, 1:35, load average: 0.55, 0.68, 0.84
    > >:
    > >: " Beware of the naked man who offers you his shirt. "
    > >:
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 4
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:40:59 +1000
    > >From: Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au>
    > >Subject: Re: mirroring websites solution? wget problems
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <20050330044059.GB6093@cskk.homeip.net>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    > >
    > >On 29Mar2005 14:15, Rick Stevens <rstevens@vitalstream.com> wrote:
    > >| I'm assuming the web site owners want you to mirror their sites. If so,
    > >| why not just set up rsync and be done with it?
    > >
    > >Well for me, some mirror sites (planetmirror, aarnet) offer MUCH more
    > >via HTTP than via rsync - for planetmirror it's a side effect of their
    > >paying-members-get-more-bandwidth system (which only works for HTTP,
    > >not RSYNC). For AARNet it seems to be some kind of maintenance or
    > >policy issue. Let me state that I MUCH prefer rsync for mirroring.
    > >
    > >At any rate, some things are only available via HTTP.
    > >
    > >I have my own problems with wget; not authentication since I'm mirroring
    > >public repositories. My invocation says:
    > >
    > > wget --mirror -D hostname -nH --cut-dirs=ncut -P local-dir
    > >http://blah...
    > >
    > >where ncut is set to get the right portion of the tree. It seems to leak
    > >out of the site (or, possibly, out of the HTTP subtree) into other data
    > >producing a currupt mirror at my end.
    > >
    > >Are people aware of problems with --mirror? Are there options I shouldn't
    > >use with it? Is there a standard recipe for mirroring http://blah/sub/path
    > >into an arbitrary subdir _without_ the leading cruft dirs wget normally
    > >prepends (thus the --cut-dirs)?
    > >
    > >Cheers,
    > >--
    > >Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> DoD#743
    > >http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
    > >
    > >We would've believed it was an accidental shooting if he hadn't changed
    > >magazines ......TWICE - suicide@will.apana.org.au
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 5
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:01:35 -0800
    > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Subject: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved
    > >To: fedora-list@redhat.com
    > >Message-ID: <200503292101.41356.rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    > >
    > >I thought it was resolved, but it turned out the WAP had not restored WEP
    > >encryption like I thought it had. So, the wireless card works fine with
    > >WEP
    > >turned off, but not when it's turned on. I've tried:
    > >
    > ># iwconfig wlan0 key XXXXXXXXXX restricted
    > >
    > >which generates this error:
    > >
    > >Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A):
    > > SET failed on device wlan0 ; Invalid argument.
    > >
    > >My Googling indicates that this might mean that the card does not support
    > >encryption, which I find unlikely since it certainly does under Windows.
    > >
    > >I also tried:
    > >
    > ># iwconfig wlan0 key 0xXXXXXXXXXX restricted
    > >
    > >That generated no errors, but did not give me connectivity.
    > >
    > >--
    > >Slainte,
    > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@mossroot.com)
    > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com
    > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus."
    > >-Mark Twain
    > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc
    > >-------------- next part --------------
    > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > >Name: not available
    > >Type: application/pgp-signature
    > >Size: 189 bytes
    > >Desc: not available
    > >Url :
    > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/eeb13412/attachment.bin
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 6
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:14:29 -0500
    > >From: Chris Ruprecht <chris@ruprecht.org>
    > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved
    > >To: rscrawford@mossroot.com, For users of Fedora Core releases
    > > <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Cc: Fedora List <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <200503300014.37349.chris@ruprecht.org>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    > >
    > >Richard,
    > >
    > >what card are you using? I'm running the internat IPW2100 card (Intel
    > >stuff)
    > >on my ThinkPad. It started to work fine after I got the firmware downloaded
    > >and installed correctly.
    > >
    > >To get it going I used the GUI netconfig tool (Under System Tools ->
    > >Network
    > >Device Control in KDE). I set up the key and all that stuff there. Be
    > >careful
    > >to use the right number of characters for WEP. the 64-bit WEP used 5 bytes
    > >(actually only 40 bit encryption). The 160 bit (I think that what it is)
    > >uses
    > >13 bytes for encryption.
    > >
    > >Since the card works without WEP, my initial thought of checking your MAC
    > >filtering on the WAP would be a moot point, but I mention it anyway.
    > >
    > >Also, make sure that you're actually talking to your WAP and not some other
    > >thing that one of your neighbors uses.
    > >
    > >Best regards,
    > >Chris
    > >
    > >
    > >On Wednesday 30 March 2005 00:01, Richard S. Crawford wrote:
    > > > I thought it was resolved, but it turned out the WAP had not restored
    > >WEP
    > > > encryption like I thought it had. So, the wireless card works fine with
    > > > WEP turned off, but not when it's turned on. I've tried:
    > > >
    > > > # iwconfig wlan0 key XXXXXXXXXX restricted
    > > >
    > > > which generates this error:
    > > >
    > > > Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A):
    > > > SET failed on device wlan0 ; Invalid argument.
    > > >
    > > > My Googling indicates that this might mean that the card does not
    > >support
    > > > encryption, which I find unlikely since it certainly does under Windows.
    > > >
    > > > I also tried:
    > > >
    > > > # iwconfig wlan0 key 0xXXXXXXXXXX restricted
    > > >
    > > > That generated no errors, but did not give me connectivity.
    > >-------------- next part --------------
    > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > >Name: not available
    > >Type: application/pgp-signature
    > >Size: 189 bytes
    > >Desc: not available
    > >Url :
    > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050330/c51b1b9e/attachment.bin
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 7
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:19:42 +0300
    > >From: Marius Andreiana <malists@epon.ro>
    > >Subject: Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook
    > >To: fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <1112159982.3553.5.camel@marte.biciclete.ro>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain
    > >
    > >On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 13:39 -0800, Aaron O'Hara wrote:
    > > > Is anybody aware of software that enables Outlook users and non-Outlook
    > > > users (like Evolution) to share calendar information using a Linux-based
    > > > server?
    > >www.opengroupware.org
    > >Works, good code base, rpms available or use yum.
    > >Evolution plugin is in beta.
    > >
    > >--
    > >Marius Andreiana
    > >Epon Business Applications
    > >http://www.epon.ro
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 8
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:25:02 -0800
    > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved
    > >To: Chris Ruprecht <chris@ruprecht.org>
    > >Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <200503292125.08789.rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    > >
    > >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 9:14 pm, Chris Ruprecht flailed at a keyboard and
    > >produced this:
    > > > Richard,
    > > >
    > > > what card are you using? I'm running the internat IPW2100 card (Intel
    > >stuff)
    > > > on my ThinkPad. It started to work fine after I got the firmware
    > >downloaded
    > > > and installed correctly.
    > >
    > >I'm using a Linksys WPC54GS (with something called "speedbooster", whatever
    > >the heck that is).
    > >
    > >
    > > > To get it going I used the GUI netconfig tool (Under System Tools ->
    > >Network
    > > > Device Control in KDE). I set up the key and all that stuff there. Be
    > >careful
    > > > to use the right number of characters for WEP. the 64-bit WEP used 5
    > >bytes
    > > > (actually only 40 bit encryption). The 160 bit (I think that what it is)
    > >uses
    > > > 13 bytes for encryption.
    > >
    > >Yeah, I've quadruple-checked that. Heh. Thanks, though.
    > >
    > >
    > > > Since the card works without WEP, my initial thought of checking your
    > >MAC
    > > > filtering on the WAP would be a moot point, but I mention it anyway.
    > >
    > >I do filter on MAC addresses, but I've made sure the MAC address for my
    > >wireless card is on the list of allowed cards.
    > >
    > >
    > > > Also, make sure that you're actually talking to your WAP and not some
    > >other
    > > > thing that one of your neighbors uses.
    > >
    > >Yup.
    > >
    > >Dang it.
    > >
    > >Thanks, though.
    > >
    > >
    > >--
    > >Slainte,
    > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@mossroot.com)
    > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com
    > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus."
    > >-Mark Twain
    > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc
    > >-------------- next part --------------
    > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > >Name: not available
    > >Type: application/pgp-signature
    > >Size: 189 bytes
    > >Desc: not available
    > >Url :
    > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/26743f8e/attachment.bin
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 9
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:57:52 +0530
    > >From: gaurav <gauravp@hclcomnet.co.in>
    > >Subject: Oracle 9i and FC3/RHEL 4 howto
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <424A38D8.4080608@hclcomnet.co.in>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    > >
    > >
    > >http://www.pagux.com/oracle9ionfedora3.html
    > >
    > >might be helpful if you ever need to install Oracle 9i on fedora 3 or
    > >RHEL 4
    > >
    > >I also want to thank Jean Francois for helping me out on most tricky part
    > >:-)
    > >
    > >Regards,
    > >Gaurav
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 10
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:30:40 -0800
    > >From: "Richard S. Crawford" <rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity - was resolved, then unresolved,
    > > now RESOLVED!!!
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <200503292130.41030.rscrawford@mossroot.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    > >
    > >Hah! Got it.
    > >
    > >Deep in the heart of /etc/sysconfig/networking/devices, I found two files:
    > >ifcfg-wlan0, and keys-wlan0. I made sure that ifcfg-wlan0 had the right
    > >entry for my WAP under ESSID; then in keys-wlan0, I found that the line for
    > >KEY= was blank. I put in my encryption key, reactivated wlan0 and
    > >deactivated eth0 (and even unplugged the cable), restarted networking, and
    > >even rebooted for the hell of it. SUCCESS!
    > >
    > >That was the longest eight hours I've ever spent trying to get a wireless
    > >card
    > >working under Linux. But now I'm finally MS free on my new laptop (well,
    > >mostly; still using a Windows driver for my wireless under ndiswrapper, of
    > >course, but what the hell).
    > >
    > >--
    > >Slainte,
    > >Richard S. Crawford (mailto: rscrawford@mossroot.com)
    > >AIM: Buffalo2K / http://www.mossroot.com
    > >"You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus."
    > >-Mark Twain
    > >GPG Public Key located at: http://www.mossroot.com/rscrawford.asc
    > >-------------- next part --------------
    > >A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
    > >Name: not available
    > >Type: application/pgp-signature
    > >Size: 189 bytes
    > >Desc: not available
    > >Url :
    > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050329/57f32550/attachment.bin
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 11
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:34:47 +0100
    > >From: "D. D. Brierton" <darren@dzr-web.com>
    > >Subject: Re: FOSS, Shared Calendars, & Outlook
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <1112160887.6112.79.camel@excession.dzr>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain
    > >
    > >On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:19 +0300, Marius Andreiana wrote:
    > > > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 13:39 -0800, Aaron O'Hara wrote:
    > > > > Is anybody aware of software that enables Outlook users and
    > >non-Outlook
    > > > > users (like Evolution) to share calendar information using a
    > >Linux-based
    > > > > server?
    > >
    > >Also, you should check out Hula (http://hula-project.org/), which is in
    > >early stages of development in one sense, but is based upon a *very*
    > >mature codebase. See my blog entry about it:
    > >
    > >http://www.dzr-web.com/people/darren/blog/2005/02/15/novell-announce-hula/
    > >
    > >and in particular this link to Nat Friedman's blog:
    > >
    > >http://nat.org/2005/february/#15-February-2005
    > >
    > >Also, this link to something by Jamie Zawinski:
    > >
    > >http://www.jwz.org/doc/groupware.html
    > >
    > >is both one of the best things I've read in a long while and provides
    > >some of background to the aims of Hula with respect to calendar sharing.
    > >
    > >Best, Darren
    > >
    > >--
    > >=====================================================================
    > >D. D. Brierton darren@dzr-web.com www.dzr-web.com
    > > Trying is the first step towards failure (Homer Simpson)
    > >=====================================================================
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 12
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:04:28 -0500
    > >From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
    > >Subject: Re: Top Posting....
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <200503300104.29167.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    > >
    > >On Tuesday 29 March 2005 15:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
    > > >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Phil Labonte wrote:
    > > >> To quote the Wikipedia definition:
    > > >> "Top-posting is considered improper by some OLDER DEFINITIONS of
    > > >> Internet etiquette since it breaks down the flow of the thread:"
    > > >>
    > > >> It's time to embrace change, change is good. Top posting gis here
    > > >> to stay especially because of GMAIL and outlook...
    > > >
    > > >jeezus, can we just start two lists for every fedora-related topic?
    > > >one list will be for clueful people who don't top post, who don't
    > > > post in HTML, who properly trim their posts and who don't have
    > > > 30-line idiotic, company-mandated sigs whose only purpose is to
    > > > justify their corporate lawyers' existence.
    > > >
    > > >the other list will be for the annoying, clueless twits who think
    > > >linux mailing list behaviour should be mandated by what freakin'
    > > >outlook does.
    > > >
    > > >rday
    > >
    > >Finally, a solution to the problem that might actually work. ;-)
    > >
    > >Unforch, the mail server would have to translate the To: address
    > >according to whether or not the message contained top-posting I'd
    > >think, because we'ed otherwise fail at convincing said twits to use
    > >the right list.
    > >
    > >That shouldn't be too hard to code up in a bash script I'd think.
    > >
    > >--
    > >Cheers, Gene
    > >"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
    > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
    > >-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
    > >99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
    > >Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
    > >message by Gene Heskett are:
    > >Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 13
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:17:56 -0600
    > >From: Sam Williams <sam@mbz.org>
    > >Subject: Herding cats, Was: Top Posting....
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <1112163476.4668.138.camel@localhost.localdomain>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain
    > >
    > >Until someone creates a tutorial on email formatting with an exam one
    > >must pass before subscribing to this list, we are unlikely to see much
    > >consistency. To enforce it among those who managed to subscribe, modify
    > >the list server to mark up and return any posts that don't adhere to
    > >standards:
    > > "Your message to the list has been rejected for:
    > > Top posting
    > > HTML
    > > Spelling error
    > > Please correct and resubmit."
    > >Or maybe, with the excess profits from running this list we could hire a
    > >style conscious moderator.
    > >
    > >Thanks for help with Fedora issues I didn't understand before. As long
    > >as this list caters to those who don't know everything about ..IX,
    > >newbies' lacking knowledge of experts' style preferences will probably
    > >be with us. Try not to stress.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 14
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:22:23 -0800
    > >From: G S <nsbutgs@gmail.com>
    > >Subject: Re: Wireless connectivity NOT resolved
    > >To: rscrawford@mossroot.com, For users of Fedora Core releases
    > > <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <65ab587905032922225d9819cd@mail.gmail.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    > >
    > >do you know what authentification you are using Open System or Shared
    > >Keys? Some drivers used not to support Shared Keys (and this mode is
    > >belived to be less secure, nevertheless the name - vole MS even
    > >doesn't recommend to use it). Check what you have in your AP settings
    > >and try to use open system mode if it's not set up yet.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 15
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:39:30 -0800
    > >From: G S <nsbutgs@gmail.com>
    > >Subject: Re: wide screen laptop problem
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <65ab58790503292239d7bc1cb@mail.gmail.com>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    > >
    > > > hmm, neither method worked for me unfortunatley. I still don't get the
    > >option
    > > > for 1280x800 when I run system-config-display.
    > >
    > >can u post you xorg.conf? at least monitor, screen, and device (with
    > >your video adapter) sections.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 16
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:50:26 +0900
    > >From: Mark Sargent <powderkeg@snow.email.ne.jp>
    > >Subject: Snort failing at Boot
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <424A4C32.2020404@snow.email.ne.jp>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    > >
    > >Hi All,
    > >
    > >I have snort set to start up at boot, but, get an error and it fails. I
    > >have checked messages and boot.log, but nothing showing what the actual
    > >problem is. It was due to a file not being found, but I wasn't quick
    > >enuff to write it down. Where else would I find this info other than the
    > >2 logs I mentioned.? Cheers.
    > >
    > >Mark Sargent.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 17
    > >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:58:24 +0200
    > >From: Joachim Backes <backes@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
    > >Subject: Strange message during "yum update" in FC3
    > >To: FEDORA <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <1112165904.4794.10.camel@sunny.rhrk.uni-kl.de>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain
    > >
    > >Hi,
    > >
    > >I'm running FC3. Now, getting a strange message during "yum update":
    > >
    > > '/usr/share/applications/vmware-workstation.desktop' contains invalid
    > >MIME type ' application/x-vmware-team' that contains invalid characters
    > >
    > >I have installed vmware-4.5.2.
    > >
    > >Somebody made similar experiences?
    > >
    > >Regards
    > >
    > >
    > >Joachim Backes
    > >
    > >Joachim Backes <backes@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
    > >University of Kaiserslautern,Computer Center [RHRK],
    > >Systems and Operations, High Performance Computing,
    > >D-67653 Kaiserslautern, PO Box 3049, Germany
    > >--------------------------------------------------
    > >Phone: +49-631-205-2438, FAX: +49-631-205-3056
    > >http://hlrwm.rhrk.uni-kl.de/home/staff/backes.html
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >Message: 18
    > >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:10:35 -1000
    > >From: Chris Stark <cstark@hawaii.edu>
    > >Subject: Re: wide screen laptop problem
    > >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    > >Message-ID: <424A50EB.7030806@hawaii.edu>
    > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    > >
    > >G S wrote:
    > > >>hmm, neither method worked for me unfortunatley. I still don't get the
    > >option
    > > >>for 1280x800 when I run system-config-display.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > can u post you xorg.conf? at least monitor, screen, and device (with
    > > > your video adapter) sections.
    > >
    > >My laptop never works with the system-config-display tool (1440x900),
    > >and I have a feeling it's because the laptop monitor is sending
    > >incorrect info to the X server. You may have to set a custom modeline
    > >(and possibly instruct X not to listen to the monitor's info).
    > >
    > >For the modeline, in a terminal type:
    > >
    > >gtf 1280 800 60
    > >
    > >This should result in something like:
    > >
    > >Modeline "1280x800_60.00" 83.46 1280 1344 1480 1680 800 801 804 828
    > >-HSync +Vsync
    > >
    > >Paste the output of this command (as a single line) into your
    > >/etc/X11/xorg.conf file under the "Monitor" section. You should also
    > >rename the modeline from "1280x800_60.00" to "1280x800".
    > >
    > >Next, you'll need to add "1280x800" to each of the subsections under the
    > > "Screen" section.
    > >
    > >If this alone doesn't work, you may also want to try adding this line to
    > >the Monitor section:
    > >
    > >Option "IgnoreEDID" "1"
    > >
    > >I hope this helps.
    > >
    > >Aloha
    > >--
    > >Chris Stark
    > >Musician, Linux User, & Grad Student
    > >http://chrisstark.com/
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >------------------------------
    > >
    > >--
    > >fedora-list mailing list
    > >fedora-list@redhat.com
    > >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    > >
    > >End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 13, Issue 397
    > >********************************************
    >
    > --
    > fedora-list mailing list
    > fedora-list@redhat.com
    > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    >

    -- 
    Adam.Stokes
    <adam.stokes@gmail.com>
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Paul Howarth: "Re: bad posting habits, jeremy bernstein and scientific cranks"

    Relevant Pages

    • Remove me from your email list please!
      ... I have received approx 500 emails from you recently. ... >> when one posts to this list one posts to a public forum. ... >Well, I stopped the pcmcia service and removed the card, then put it back ... >wireless card is working. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Wireless Connection Help Needed
      ... I installed a Linksys WMP54G wireless card in a Dell Dimension ... Router, and it also shows the appropriate IP address for the Gateway, DNS, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
    • Re: A netcard driver failed the query for OID_GEN_LINK_SPEED How do you fix? UPDATE
      ... Well, I pulled apart the various panels, used compressed gas, fan spins ... The card does not see the wireless B broadcast at all. ... > going to lend me a spare Wireless Card tomorrow. ...
      (alt.internet.wireless)
    • Re: May 2001
      ... |>difficulty responding to emails because it was too physically demanding ... |>If you'd care to sign the card I'm bringing to Bouchercon for her, ... Be happy to, Mique.. ... Annie ...
      (rec.arts.mystery)
    • Re: Yeah!!! Wireless is Up and Working !!!
      ... read the manual that came with my wireless LAN pci card. ... > MS-Windows driver that came with the wireless card, ... use a Zyxel wireless card I can not get the latter ...
      (alt.linux)